Results
69-25-01: 69-25-01\tBOEING: Amdt. 39-882. Applies to Model 727, 727C and 727-200 series airplanes. \n\tCompliance required within the next 2500 hours time in service after the effective date of this AD, unless already accomplished. \n\tTo prevent malfunction of the generator control circuit caused by induced electrical interference, accomplish the following or an equivalent modification procedure and parts installation approved by the Chief, Aircraft Engineering Division, FAA Western Region. \n\tWithin 2500 hours time in service after the effective date of this AD, unless already accomplished, modify the generator control panels in accordance with Section II, Boeing Service Bulletin No. 24-47, dated March 3, 1969, or later FAA approved revisions. \n\tThis amendment becomes effective January 3, 1970.
2009-14-06: The FAA is superseding an existing airworthiness directive (AD), which applies to all Boeing Model 777 airplanes. That AD currently requires, for the drive mechanism of the horizontal stabilizer, repetitive detailed inspections for discrepancies, repetitive lubrication of the ballnut and ballscrew, repetitive measurements of the freeplay between the ballnut and the ballscrew, and corrective action if necessary. This new AD revises the compliance times of the existing AD. This AD results from a report of extensive corrosion of a ballscrew in the drive mechanism of the horizontal stabilizer on a Boeing Model 757 airplane, which is similar in design to the ballscrew on Model 777 airplanes. We are issuing this AD to prevent an undetected failure of the primary load path for the ballscrew in the drive mechanism of the horizontal stabilizer and subsequent wear and failure of the secondary load path, which could lead to loss of control of the horizontal stabilizer and consequent lossof control of the airplane.
98-26-21: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Boeing Model 727 series airplanes that have been converted from a passenger to a cargo-carrying ("freighter") configuration, that requires limiting the payload on the main cargo deck by revising the Limitations Sections of all Airplane Flight Manuals (AFM), AFM Supplements, and Airplane Weight and Balance Supplements for these airplanes. This amendment also provides for the submission of data and analyses that substantiate the strength of the main cargo deck, or modification of the main cargo deck, as optional terminating action for these payload restrictions. This amendment is prompted by the FAA's determination that under certain conditions unreinforced floor structure of the main cargo deck is not strong enough to enable the airplane to safely carry the maximum payload that is currently allowed in this area. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent failure of the floor structure, which could lead to loss of the airplane.
2002-14-05: This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas Model MD-11 airplanes, that currently requires repetitive general visual inspections of the power feeder cables, terminal strip, fuseholder, and fuses of the galley load control unit (GLCU) within the No. 3 bay electrical power center to detect damage; and corrective actions, if necessary. This amendment requires replacement of the electrical wiring of the galley in the electrical power center in bays 1, 2, and 3 with larger gage cable assemblies, which terminates the repetitive inspections. This amendment also expands the applicability of the existing AD to include two additional airplanes. This action is necessary to prevent damage to the wire assembly terminal lugs and overheating of the power feeder cables on the No. 3 and 4 GLCU, which could result in smoke and fire in the center accessory compartment. This action is intended to address the identified unsafe condition. \n\n\tThe incorporation by reference of certain other publications, as listed in the regulations, was approved previously by the Director of the Federal Register as of January 4, 2000 (64 FR 71001, December 20, 1999).
2008-06-20 R1: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above that would revise an existing AD. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as: Subsequent to accidents involving Fuel Tank System explosions in flight * * * and on ground, * * * Special Federal Aviation Regulation 88 (SFAR88) * * * required a safety review of the aircraft Fuel Tank System * * *. * * * * * Fuel Airworthiness Limitations are items arising from a systems safety analysis that have been shown to have failure mode(s) associated with an `unsafe condition' * * *. These are identified in Failure Conditions for which an unacceptable probability of ignition risk could exist if specific tasks and/or practices are not performed in accordance with the manufacturers' requirements. This ADrequires actions that are intended to address the unsafe condition described in the MCAI. DATES: This AD becomes effective December 8, 2009. On April 23, 2008 (73 FR 14661, March 19, 2008), the Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in the AD. We must receive comments on this AD by January 7, 2010.
2009-12-51: This document publishes in the Federal Register an amendment adopting emergency airworthiness directive (AD) 2009-12-51 that was sent previously to all known U.S. owners and operators of Turbomeca S.A. Arriel 1A1, 1A2, 1B, 1C, 1C1, 1C2, 1D, 1D1, 1E2, 1K1, 1S, and 1S1 turboshaft engines. This AD requires initial and repetitive visual inspections of certain reduction gearboxes (module M05) for oil leakage, repair if leaking, and repair of all affected modules as terminating action to the repetitive inspections. This AD results from reports of oil leaks from certain reduction gearbox (module M05) front casings. The engine manufacturer reported that the lubrication duct plug was not properly bonded/glued in place. We are issuing this AD to prevent uncommanded in-flight engine shutdown, possible engine fire, and an emergency autorotation landing.
94-22-06: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Bombardier Model CL-600-2B19 series airplanes, that requires modification of the stall protection system (SPS) input wiring; a revision to the FAA-approved Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) to specify that a pre-flight check of the slip/skid indications must be conducted prior to engine start; and modification of the stall protection computer (SPC) to accept restored dual attitude and heading reference system (AHRS) input. This amendment is prompted by a report that the AHRS could send conflicting input to the SPC on the airplane. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent the loss of stall warning protection on the airplanes.
90-15-12: 90-15-12 BOEING: Amendment 39-6663. Docket No. 90-NM-130. \n\n\tApplicability: All model 727 series airplanes, modified by installation of Pratt and Whitney JT8D-217C or -219 engines in accordance with Valsan Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) SA4363NM, certificated in any category. \n\n\tCompliance: Required as indicated, unless previously accomplished. \n\n\tTo prevent the migration off the through-bolt of engine front mount upper and lower cone bolt through-bolt nut, accomplish the following: \n\n\tA.\tWithin 48 clock hours (not flight hours) after receipt of Telegraphic AD T90-11- 53, dated May 24, 1990, inspect the through-bolt nut, part number SPS83978-1216, for proper torque and for certain conditions in accordance with Valsan Operator Service Letter OSL-727RE- 007, Revision 1, dated May 23, 1990. If any discrepancies are found, prior to further flight, take corrective action in accordance with the previously mentioned service letter. \n\n\tB.\tRepeat the inspections in accordance with Valsan Operator Service Letter OSL- 727RE-007, Revision 1, dated May 23, 1990, at intervals not to exceed 35 flight hours. \n\n\tC.\tWithin 10 days after performing the inspection required by paragraph A., above, submit a report of any discrepancies discovered, to the Manager, Los Angeles Manufacturing Inspection District Office, 3229 East Spring Street, Long Beach, California 90806-2425. The report must include the airplane's serial number. \n\n\tD.\tWithin 60 days after the effective date of this amendment, install anti-rotation plates in accordance with Valsan Service Bulletin 71-002, dated June 1, 1990. This modification constitutes terminating action for the repetitive inspections required by paragraphs A. and B., above. \n\n\tE.\tAn alternate means of compliance or adjustment of the compliance time, which provides an acceptable level of safety, may be used when approved by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. \n\n\tNOTE: The request should be submitted directly to the Manager, Seattle ACO, and a copy sent to the cognizant FAA Principal Inspector (PI). The PI will then forward comments or concurrence to the Seattle ACO. \n\n\tF.\tSpecial flight permits may be issued in accordance with FAR 21.197 and 21.199 to operate airplanes to a base in order to comply with the requirements of this AD. \n\n\tAll persons affected by this directive who have not already received the appropriate service information from the manufacturer may obtain copies upon request to Valsan Product Support, 3605 Long Beach Boulevard, Suite 205, Long Beach, California 90807. This information may be examined at the FAA, Northwest Mountain Region, Transport Airplane Directorate, 17900 Pacific Highway South, Seattle, Washington, or at the Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 9010 East Marginal Way South, Seattle, Washington. \n\n\tThis amendment (39-6663, AD 90-15-12) supersedes telegraphic AD T90-11-53, dated May 24, 1990. \n\tThis amendment becomes effective on July 31, 1990.
2009-24-06: The FAA is superseding an existing airworthiness directive (AD) for GE CF34-8E series turbofan engines with certain part number (P/N) full authority digital electronic controls (FADECs) installed. That AD currently requires removing certain P/N FADECs. This superseding AD requires removal of 12 more P/Ns of FADECs. This AD results from 20 additional reports received of loss of thrust control events since AD 2008-16-01 was issued. We are issuing this AD to prevent loss of thrust control of the airplane.
2009-13-09: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above, on which the exhaust thermal insulation has been replaced since January 1, 1995. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as: Due to a lapse in manufacturing quality control, the exhaust thermal insulation of certain Microturbo SA Saphir 2 model 016 auxiliary power units (APUs) may not meet the approved design standard, and may fail in service. The affected part numbers are 016-33-01 (Inner Thermal Insulation), 016-33-02 (Outer Thermal Insulation), and 016-33-03 (EGT Sensor Thermal Insulation). This condition, if not corrected, could result in rapid deterioration and physical breakdown of the exhaust thermal insulation, leading to loss of insulation efficiency and ultimately exposure of the hot APU exhaust section and risk of fire. We are issuing this AD to prevent rapid deterioration and physical breakdown of the exhaust thermal insulation, leading to loss of insulation efficiency and ultimately exposure of the hot APU exhaust section and risk of fire.