Results
2003-07-08: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Boeing Model 757-200, 757-200CB, and 757-200PF series airplanes. This action requires repetitive detailed inspections to detect horizontal or vertical movement of the shims at the joint of the mid-bulkhead and the upper link fittings, and corrective action if necessary; or certain alternative actions that will terminate the requirement for the repetitive inspections. This action is necessary to detect and correct migration of shims at the joint of the mid-bulkhead and the upper link fittings, which could result in cracking of the strut and consequent loss of the strut and engine.
2012-03-02: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain The Boeing Company Model 767-200, -300, and -300F series airplanes. This AD was prompted by reports of loss of avionics cooling due to an unserviceable relay installed on a panel as part of the cabin air conditioning and temperature control system (CACTCS). This AD requires doing certain wiring changes, installing a new relay and necessary wiring in the CACTCS, and performing an operational test of the cooling pack system. We are issuing this AD to prevent loss of electrical equipment bay cooling and the overheating of flight deck instruments, which would result in the eventual loss of primary flight displays, an unusually high pilot workload, and depressurization of the cabin.
2003-07-03: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that applies to certain Twin Commander Aircraft Corporation (TCAC) Models 690D, 695A, and 695B airplanes. This AD requires you to initially inspect and modify and repetitively inspect areas of the wing and fuselage structure for fatigue damage and modify or replace any damaged parts. This AD is the result of tests that show that the service life of certain airplane parts cannot be reached unless an inspection and modification program (with any necessary replacements or modifications if fatigue damage is found) is incorporated. The actions specified by this AD are intended to detect and correct fatigue damage in the wing and fuselage areas without reducing the service life of the airplane. Such undetected and uncorrected damage could result in structural failure with consequent loss of control of the airplane.
96-18-10: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Airbus Model A300-600 and A310 series airplanes, that requires an inspection to detect defects of the directional pilot valves (DPV); and replacement of any defective DPV with a new DPV, or deactivation of the thrust reverser system, if necessary. This amendment is prompted by a report indicating that, during a maintenance check, an uncommanded deployment and stowage of the thrust reverser occurred due to improperly modified DPV's. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent uncommanded deployment and stowage of the thrust reverser during maintenance activities, as a result of improperly modified DPV's, which could result in injury to maintenance personnel or other people on the ground.
98-15-26: This amendment supersedes an existing priority letter Airworthiness Directive (AD) 98-03-15, applicable to McDonnell Douglas Helicopter Systems (MDHS) Model 369, 369A, 369D, 369E, 369F, 369FF, 369H, 369HE, 369HM, 369HS, 500N, 600N, and OH-6 helicopters that currently requires an inspection for main rotor blade (blade) cracks and for missing or cracked adhesive or paint. This amendment requires the same inspections required by the existing priority letter AD but deletes the Model 369 (Army YOH-6A), specifies recording torque events (TE), and establishes a shorter retirement life for certain blades. This amendment is prompted by an accident in which a blade failed on a Model 369D helicopter due to fatigue cracks. The actions specified by this AD are intended to detect cracks that could lead to failure of the blade and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.
93-13-05: 93-13-05 DASSAULT AVIATION: Amendment 39-8618. Docket 92-NM-167-AD. Applicability: All Model Mystere-Falcon 900 series airplanes, certificated in any category. Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished previously. To prevent interference with the operation of the engine controls and the flight controls, accomplish the following: (a) Within 50 hours time-in-service or 30 days after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first, accomplish paragraph (a)(1) or (a)(2) of this AD, as applicable. (1) For airplanes equipped with a Falcon Jet Corporation type interior (a water system pressure accumulator is installed on the left-hand side of frame 25): Perform a complete inspection of the water system in accordance with paragraph 13 of the Supplemental Maintenance Manual, Temporary Revision, dated February 1992; and install a placard, part number FGFB 825 003 760, in a visible location in the aft toilet compartment. (2) For airplanes equipped with a Dassault Aviation type interior (no water system pressure accumulator is installed at frame 25): Accomplish paragraphs (a)(2)(i), (a)(2)(ii), and (a)(2)(iii) of this AD. (i) Perform a complete inspection of the water system, in accordance with procedure 38-102 of the Maintenance Manual. (ii) Reinforce the sealing of the collector under the washbasin, in accordance with Dassault Aviation Service Bulletin F900-113 (F900-38-4), dated March 25, 1992. (iii) Perform an inspection of heating element 43 HR of pipe item 320, Illustrated Parts Catalog (IPC) 38-30-20, figure 10, in accordance with procedure 30-701 of the Maintenance Manual; and, if a discrepancy is found, replace the heating element within 50 hours time-in- service after performing the inspection required by this paragraph. (b) Prior to each flight of more than 4 hours time-in-service that occurs after accomplishing the requirements of paragraph (a) of this AD, accomplish the following, as applicable: Inspect the water system, in accordance with the paragraph entitled "Maintenance of Pressurized Central Water System" (page 19), of Revision 4 of the Supplemental Maintenance Manual (for Model Mystere-Falcon 900 series airplanes equipped with a Falcon Jet Corporation type interior); or in accordance with procedure 05-100 (temporary revision No. 59) of the Maintenance Manual (for Model Mystere-Falcon 900 series airplanes equipped with a Dassault Aviation type interior). (c) Within the next 300 hours time-in-service or 6 months after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first, repeat the inspection required by paragraph (a)(1) or (a)(2)(i) of this AD, as applicable. Thereafter, repeat the applicable inspection at intervals not to exceed 300 hours time-in-service or 6 months after the immediately preceding inspection, whichever occurs first. (d) Within 2 years after the effective date of this AD, modify the underfloor heating at frame 25, in accordancewith Dassault Aviation Service Bulletin F900-115 (F900-30-9), dated May 6, 1992, or Revision 1, dated February 25, 1993. (e) Accomplishment of modification of the underfloor heating in accordance with Dassault Aviation Service Bulletin F900-115 (F900-30-9), dated May 6, 1992, or Revision 1, dated February 25, 1993, constitutes terminating action for the inspections required by paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of this AD. (f) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used if approved by the Manager, Standardization Branch, ANM-113, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, Standardization Branch, ANM-113. NOTE: Information concerning the existence of approved alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be obtained from the Standardization Branch, ANM-113. (g) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with FAR 21.197 and 21.199 to operate the airplane to a location where the requirements of this AD can be accomplished. (h) The reinforcement shall be done in accordance with Dassault Aviation Service Bulletin F900-113 (F900-38-4), dated March 25, 1992. The modification shall be done in accordance with Dassault Aviation Service Bulletin F900-115 (F900-30-9), dated May 6, 1992; or Dassault Aviation Service Bulletin F900-115 (F900-30-9), Revision 1, dated February 25, 1993. This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR Part 51. Copies may be obtained from Falcon Jet Corporation, Customer Support Department, Teterboro Airport, Teterboro, New Jersey 07608. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 NorthCapitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC. (i) This amendment becomes effective on August 18, 1993.
2012-03-11: We are superseding an existing airworthiness directive (AD) for all Turbomeca S.A. Arriel 2B and 2B1 turboshaft engines. That AD currently requires checking the transmissible torque between the low- pressure (LP) pump impeller and the high-pressure (HP) pump shaft on high-pressure/low-pressure (HP/LP) pump hydro-mechanical metering units (HMUs) that do not incorporate Modification TU 147. This new AD requires inspection and possible replacement of the HMU. This AD was prompted by three additional cases of uncoupling of the HP/LP pump HMU LP fuel pump impeller and the HP fuel pump shaft, since the existing AD was issued. We are issuing this AD to prevent an uncommanded in-flight shutdown, which can result in a forced autorotation landing or accident.
2003-07-05: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that applies to all Stemme GmbH & Co. KG (Stemme) Models S10 and S10-V sailplanes. This AD requires you to modify the engine compartment fuel and oil system and firewall. This AD is the result of FAA's determination that the actions required in AD 2002-22-04 should also be accomplished on other sailplanes of similar type design. The actions specified by this AD are intended to reduce the potential for a fire to ignite in the engine compartment and to increase the containment of an engine fire in the engine compartment. A fire in the engine compartment could lead to loss of control of the sailplane.
77-09-02: 77-09-02 CESSNA: Amendment 39-2883. Applies to Models 421B (Serial Numbers 421B0301 thru 421B0970 except 421B0463, 421B0663 and 421B0962) and 421C (Serial Numbers 421C0001 thru 421C0272 except 421C0224, 421C0232, 421C0246, 421C0260, 421C0261 and 421C0264 thru 421C0271) airplanes. Compliance: Required as indicated, unless already accomplished. To prevent separation of the pilot's or co-pilot's windshields from the aircraft, within 50 hours' time in service after the effective date of this AD for those aircraft having 50 hours' or more time in service or upon accumulation of 100 hours' time in service for those aircraft having 49 hours' or less time in service, accomplish either Paragraph A or B below: A. Windshield Inspection and Repair: (1) Visually inspect the pilot's and co-pilot's windshield installation and if necessary, repair in accordance with Cessna Service Letter ME77-5, dated March 14, 1977, or later approved revisions and Windshield Inspection and/or Modification Attachment thereto dated March 11, 1977, or later approved revisions. (2) Paragraph A(1) must be accomplished only by maintenance personnel that have been specially trained by Cessna Aircraft Company or its designated representative for this purpose. NOTE: Owners/operators should contact their local Cessna dealer to schedule their airplane into the nearest Cessna dealership having the specially trained personnel required to accomplish Paragraph A(1). B. Unpressurized Aircraft Operation: (1) Move the cabin pressurization switch to the "unpressurized" position and place adhesive tape over the switch to prevent its movement to the "pressurized" position. (2) Fabricate a placard having white 3/16 inch or larger letters on a red background reading: "DO NOT PRESSURIZE CABIN". (3) Install the placard fabricated in Paragraph B(2) just above or adjacent to the cabin pressurization switch and operate the aircraft in accordance with this limitation until Paragraph A is accomplished. C. Any equivalent method of compliance with this AD must be approved by the Chief, Engineering and Manufacturing Branch, FAA, Central Region. This amendment becomes effective May 9, 1977.
97-25-10 R1: This amendment revises an existing airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Pratt & Whitney (PW) JT9D series turbofan engines, that currently requires initial and repetitive fluorescent penetrant inspections (FPI) for cracks in cooling air holes of first stage high pressure turbine (HPT) disks, and replacement of cracked disks with serviceable parts. In addition, the current AD requires initial and repetitive FPI for cracks in tie bolt holes of certain other affected second stage HPT disks installed in PW JT9D series turbofan engines. This amendment calls out the second stage HPT hub assembly by part number (P/N) in addition to the hub P/N for clarification of affected parts, and references a service bulletin that does not change any of the requirements in the AD, but better explains the inspection procedures that are referenced in the current AD. This amendment also increases the repetitive inspection interval of first stage HPT disks. This amendment is prompted by the need to clarify the inspection procedures and the parts affected by this AD and by a re-evaluation of the risk analysis, based on new data from service, to establish a new repetitive inspection interval for the first stage HPT disk. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent turbine disk failure due to cooling air hole or tie bolt hole cracking, which could result in an uncontained engine failure and damage to the aircraft.
98-15-02: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that is applicable to Rolls-Royce Limited, Aero Division-Bristol, S.N.E.C.M.A. Olympus 593 series turbojet engines. This action requires identifying reduced post-rebroaching cyclic life limits for certain rebroached stage 6 high pressure compressor (HPC) disks, inspecting the rebroached disks for cracks, and, if necessary, removing from service cracked disks. This amendment is prompted by reports of the low cyclic lives at which some rebroached stage 6 HPC disks have been found cracked. The actions specified in this AD are intended to prevent rebroached stage 6 HPC disk failure, which could result in an uncontained engine failure and damage to the aircraft. The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of July 29, 1998. Comments for inclusion in the Rules Docket must be received on or before September 14, 1998.
98-13-06: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that applies to certain Glaser-Dirks Flugzeugbau GmbH (Glaser-Dirks) Model DG-400 gliders. This AD requires replacing the bungees that secure the left engine restraining cable and the bowden cable of the rear engine door. This AD is the result of mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by the airworthiness authority for Germany. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent the engine from locking in flight and not extending because of the left restraining cable or bowden cable of the rear door making contact with the engine, which could result in loss of glider power and potential loss of control.
96-22-02: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Jetstream Model BAe ATP airplanes, that requires repetitive inspections of the ram air inlet ducts for structural integrity and security of fasteners, and repairs, if necessary. This amendment also provides an optional terminating modification for the repetitive inspections. This amendment is prompted by a report of the separation of a ram air inlet duct from the airplane during flight. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent such separation, which could pose a hazard to persons or property on the ground.
2012-02-14: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, -900, and -900ER series airplanes. This AD was prompted by a report that the top 3 inches of the aero/fire seals of the blocker doors on the thrust reverser torque boxes are not fireproof. This AD requires a one-time inspection to determine the part numbers of the aero/fire seals of the blocker doors on the thrust reverser torque boxes on the engines, and replacing affected aero/fire seals with new, improved aero/fire seals. We are issuing this AD to prevent a fire in the fan compartment (a fire zone) from migrating through the seal to a flammable fluid in the thrust reverser actuator compartment (a flammable fluid leakage zone), which could result in an uncontrolled fire.
98-15-04: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Airbus Model A320 series airplanes, that requires repetitive inspections for fatigue cracking of the bottom flanges of the longitudinal floor beams at frame 43; and repair, if necessary. This amendment also requires a one-time inspection for fatigue cracking of the fastener holes in the longitudinal floor beams, and modification of the floor beams, which constitutes terminating action for the repetitive inspections. This amendment is prompted by issuance of mandatory continuing airworthiness information by a foreign civil airworthiness authority. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent fatigue cracking on the bottom flanges of the longitudinal floor beams, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the airplane.
2003-07-09: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that applies to certain Raytheon Aircraft Company (Raytheon) Model 390 airplanes. This AD requires you to incorporate information into the FAA-approved Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) that would add requirements for "Landing Performance for Operation of the Airplane with Lift Dump Inoperative." This AD is the result of two accidents on the affected airplanes where a contributing factor was the lift dump spoilers failing to deploy when commanded after the initial landing. The actions specified by this AD are intended to require the use of necessary flight information to prevent runway overruns based on insufficient aerodynamic and wheel braking if the lift dump spoilers do not operate after landing touchdown. This could result in reduced or loss of control of the airplane.
2003-07-04: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that applies to certain Air Tractor, Inc. (Air Tractor) Models AT-300, AT-400, AT-400A, AT-401, AT-401B, AT-402, AT-402A, AT-402B, AT-501, AT-502, and AT-502B airplanes. This AD requires you to repetitively inspect the vertical fin front spar fitting for cracks and replace any cracked fitting found. This AD also requires you to install a steel doubler as a terminating action for the repetitive inspections. This AD is the result of a report of failure of a 1/4-inch thick vertical fin front spar fitting. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent failure of the vertical fin front spar fitting, which could result in failure of the rear spar fitting. Such failures could lead to loss of directional control of the airplane.
68-17-04: 68-17-04 CESSNA: Part 39, Amendment 39-650. Applies to Models 150 (Serial Numbers 15061533 through 15069308), 172 (Serial Numbers 17254893 through 17257161), 177 (Serial Numbers 17700001 through 17701164), 180 (Serial Numbers 18051824 through 18051977), 185 (Serial Numbers 185-1198 through 185-1429), F150 (Serial Numbers F150-0001 and up), F172H (Serial Numbers F172-0320 and up), and Reims Rocket (Serial Numbers FR172-0001 and up), airplanes equipped with pneumatic stall warning system, Cessna Part Number 0413029-200, and those Model 150, 172, 177, and 185 airplanes other than the serial numbers listed above in which the pneumatic stall warning system has been installed as a replacement for the originally installed system. \n\n\tCompliance required as indicated. \n\n\tTo assure proper operation of the stall warning system in flight accomplish the following: \n\n\t(a)\tPrior to flight, test the pneumatic stall warning system and determine if it is functioning properly, as provided in Paragraph 16-53A of Cessna 100 Series Service Manual, 1963 through 1967, which tells operators to test the horn operation by covering the opening in the left wing with a clean cloth, such as a handkerchief, and applying a slight suction by mouth to draw air through the horn. A properly functioning horn will provide a sound that is clearly audible. The check required by this part of the Airworthiness Directive maybe performed by the pilot. \n\n\t(b)\tWithin 10 hours time in service after the effective date of this Airworthiness Directive, install a placard on the instrument panel in full view of the pilot with the following wording: "Preflight test the pneumatic stall warning system as directed by AD 68-17-04." \n\n\t(c)\tIf, as a result of the preflight test required in paragraph (a) of this Airworthiness Directive, it is determined that the pneumatic stall warning system is not functioning properly, repair it by removal of Cessna reed assembly Part Number 04130281 and the installation of Cessna reed assembly Part Number 0413483-2 and by the affixing of 18 x 14 or 18 x 16 mesh screen over the exposed horn bell inside the cabin and over the left wing opening or by any other modification approved by the Chief, Engineering and Manufacturing Branch, Federal Aviation Administration, Central Region. Thereafter, flight test the aircraft to assure that the stall warning horn sounds at 5 to 10 mph above the stall warning speed and if not, recalibrate in accordance with the provisions of the afore cited paragraph of the Cessna 100 Series Service Manual or paragraph 15-41 of the Model 177 Service Manual. \n\n\tNOTE: The mesh screen need not be installed in the cabin of Cessna Model 177 aircraft. \n\n\t(d)\tIf, as a result of the preflight test required in paragraph (a) of this Airworthiness Directive, it is determined that the pneumatic stall warning system is not functioning properly, and parts for the repair of the pneumatic stall warning system as call for in paragraph (c) ofthis Airworthiness Directive are not available, repair the system by installing a properly functioning pneumatic stall warning system, Cessna Part number 0413029-200 and continue the required preflight test until the repair called for in paragraph (c) \nof this Airworthiness Directive has been accomplished. \n\n\t(e)\tAfter completion of the repair referred to in paragraph (c) above, the preflight test specified in paragraph (a) of this Airworthiness Directive may be discontinued and the placard required in paragraph (b) of this Airworthiness Directive removed from the aircraft. \n\n\tThis amendment becomes effective September 7, 1968.
87-24-07 R1: 87-24-07 R1 GULFSTREAM AEROSPACE CORPORATION: Amendment 39-5774 as amended by amendment 39-5840. Applies to Models 690, 690A, 690B, 690C, 690D, 695, 695A, and 695B (all serial numbers) airplanes certificated in any category. Compliance: Required within the next 50 hours' time-in-service after the effective date of this AD, unless already accomplished. (a) To prevent engine flameout when in or departing an icing environment, accomplish the following: (1) Revise the airplane POH/AFM by inserting or assuring that the appropriate Gulfstream published revision has been inserted as defined by the following listing: Model 690, Revision No. 23, dated May 20, 1987 Model 690A, Revision No. 30, dated May 20, 1987 Model 690B, Revision No. 23, dated May 20, 1987 Model 690C, Revision No. 21, dated April 9, 1987 Model 690D, Revision No. 12, dated April 9, 1987 Model 695, Revision no. 12, dated April 9, 1987 Model 695A, Revision No. 20, dated April 9, 1987 Model 695B,Revision No. 9, dated April 9, 1987 If the listed revision is not available, revise the POH/AFM by inserting Appendix 1 of this AD in the "LIMITATIONS" section of the POH/AFM. Appendix 1 procedures supersede any other POH/AFM procedures which may be contradictory. NOTE 1: If the above actions have been accomplished in compliance with AD 86-24-12, no further action is required in order to comply with paragraph (a)(1) of this AD. (2) For those airplanes with ignition systems having a continuous duty cycle of less than 1 hour: (i) Fabricate and install a placard on the instrument panel in clear view of the pilot stating, "This airplane is prohibited from flight into known icing," and operate the airplane in accordance with this limitation. This placard must consist of a minimum of 0.1 inch high letters with white and red contrasting letter and background colors and may be of a plastic adhesive type. (ii) The requirements of section (a)(2)(i) are no longer applicable when the aircraft ignition system having a continuous duty cycle of less than 1 hour is modified to increase the duty cycle to 1 hour or more in accordance with Gulfstream Service Information Nos. SI-211 and/or SI-212 both dated June 30, 1986. (b) The requirements of paragraph (a) of this AD are no longer applicable when the airplane is modified in accordance with Gulfstream Custom Kit Nos. 138 dated April 15, 1987, or 139 dated May 28, 1987, or by the addition of other FAA approved automatic relight ignition systems for both engines. NOTE 2: Automatic-relight ignition is a system which automatically energizes engine ignition without pilot action when engine RPM or torque decays below a specified level and de-energizes engine ignition when RPM or torque exceeds the specified level. It is not synonymous with CONTINUOS IGNITION. (c) The requirements of paragraph (a)(1) and (a)(2)(i) of this AD may be accomplished by the holder of a pilot certificate issued under Part 61 of the FAR on any airplane owned or operated by the pilot, and which is not used under Part 121 or 135. The person accomplishing these actions must make the appropriate airplane maintenance record entry as prescribed by FAR 91.173. (d) Airplanes may be flown in accordance with FAR 21.197 to a location where this AD may be accomplished. (e) An equivalent means of compliance with this AD may be used if approved by the Manager, Airplane Certification Branch, ASW-150, FAA, Fort Worth, Texas 76193-0150; telephone (817) 624-5150. All persons affected by this directive may obtain copies of the documents(s) referred to herein upon request to the Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation, Wiley Post Airport, P.O. Box 22500, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73123; Telephone (405) 789-5000; or may be examined at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel, Room 1558, 601 East 12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. This AD revises AD 87-24-07, Amendment 39-5774, which superseded AD 86-24-12, Amendment 39- 5483(52 FR 43849; November 17, 1987.). This amendment, 39-5840, becomes effective on February 9, 1988. APPENDIX I Supplement to the POH/AFM Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation Models 690, 690A, 690B, 690C, 690D, 695, 695A, and 695B Airplanes Continuous ignition switch shall be assured by selecting Manual IGN or IGN Override or IGN OVRD on the ignition switch as appropriate during all operations in actual or potential icing conditions described herein: (1) During takeoff and climb out in actual or potential icing conditions. (2) When ice is visible on, or shedding from propeller(s), spinner(s), or leading edge(s). *(3) Before selecting ENG INLET, when ice has accumulated. (4) Immediately, any time engine flameout occurs as a possible result of ice ingestion. (5) During approach and landing while in or shortly following flight in actual or potential icing conditions. *Note: If icing conditions are entered in flight without the engine anti-icing system having beenselected, switch one ENGINE system to ENG INLET ON position. If the engine runs satisfactorily, switch the second ENGINE system to the ENG INLET ON position and check that the second engine continues to run satisfactorily. CAUTION Flight in actual or potential icing conditions will be limited by duty cycle of the ignition system. Ignition system time limits must be observed to prevent exceeding duty cycle times. Operator should verify these limits for his particular installation. For the purpose of this supplement, the following definition applies: "Potential icing conditions in precipitation or visible moisture meteorological conditions: (1) Begin when the OAT is +5 degrees C (+41 degrees F) or colder, and (2) End when the OAT is +10 degrees C (+50 degrees F) or warmer." The procedures and conditions described in this appendix supersede any other POH/AFM procedures and conditions which may be contradictory.
2003-07-02: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), that is applicable to Rolls-Royce Corporation (formerly Allison Engine Company) 501-D series turboprop engines. This amendment requires removal from service of certain turbine rotor components at reduced life limits. This amendment is prompted by the result of recalculated material properties by the manufacturer. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent uncontained turbine rotor failure resulting in in-flight engine shutdown and possible damage to the airplane.
58-08-03: 58-08-03 DOUGLAS AND LOCKHEED: Applies to All Douglas DC3, Lockheed 18, and PV-1 Aircraft Having Bromochloromethane (CB) Fire Extinguisher Systems. (NOTE: Not Applicable to Systems Which Provide Leakproof Enclosures for the Fire Extinguishing Agent Containers.)\n\n\tCompliance required by October 1, 1958.\n\n\tDue to the toxicity hazard for crew and passengers existing in these airplanes having Bromochloromethane (CB) fire extinguishing system installed, particularly when the fire extinguishing agent containers are installed in the fuselage, one of the following must be accomplished.\n\n\t1.\tThe Bromochloromethane (CB) fire extinguisher agent must be replaced with a quantity of Freon 13B1 (Bromo-tri or CF3Br, equal to 0.8 times the installed weight of Bromochloromethane (CB) and a suitable breathing oxygen supply must be provided for the crew as specified in CAR 4b.651.\n\n\t2.\tThe Bromochloromethane (CB) fire extinguisher agent must be replaced with a quantity of carbon dioxide (CO2)equal to 1.25 times the installed quantity of Bromochloromethane (CB) and a suitable breathing oxygen supply must be provided for the crew as specified in CAR 4b.651.\n\n\t3.\tThe installed Bromochloromethane (CB) system must be shown to comply with the requirements of CAR 4b.371(b) and 4b.484(b)(2).\n\n\tNOTE: This may be accomplished by enclosing the containers with a similar or equivalent system to that shown on AiResearch Drawings C-4900-77B sheets 1 to 3 inclusive.
2003-06-04: This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to all Airbus Model A300 B4-600, B4-600R, and F4-600R (collectively called A300-600) series airplanes, that currently requires repetitive inspections to detect cracking of the upper radius of the forward fitting of frame 47, and repair if necessary. This amendment retains those requirements but shortens the initial compliance time and the repetitive inspection intervals. This amendment also expands the applicability to include additional airplanes. This amendment is prompted by issuance of mandatory continuing airworthiness information by a civil airworthiness authority. The actions specified by this AD are intended to detect and correct such fatigue cracking, which could result in propagation of the cracking to the rear fitting and reduced structural integrity of fuselage frame 47.
98-13-25: This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Fokker Model F.28 Mark 1000, 2000, 3000, and 4000 series airplanes, that currently requires an inspection to detect free movement of the actuator servo-valve sub-assembly of the horizontal stabilizer actuator, and replacement, if necessary. This amendment adds a one-time inspection to determine the residual strength of the servo-valve sub-assembly of the horizontal stabilizer actuator, and replacement of the actuator with a new or serviceable actuator, if necessary; and eventual replacement of the horizontal stabilizer actuator with an improved actuator. This amendment is prompted by issuance of mandatory continuing airworthiness information by a foreign civil airworthiness authority. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent uncommanded trimming or failure of the trim system of the horizontal stabilizer, and consequent reduced controllability of the airplane.
67-33-04: 67-33-04 GRUMMAN: Amdt. 39-533 Part 39 Federal Register December 30, 1967. Applies to G-159 Type Airplanes. Compliance required within the next 15 hours' time in service after the effective date of this AD, unless already accomplished. To detect cracks in the aileron control idler, P/N 159CM10212-1, located in the upper portion of each cockpit flight control column, accomplish the following: (a) Remove cover, P/N 159CM10080-11, from the top of the control column housing and inspect each surface of the idler for deformation or cracks using a borescope, or use an FAA-approved equivalent inspection method. The idler need not be removed to conduct this inspection. (b) Replace deformed or cracked idlers before further flight with a part of the same part number that has been inspected in accordance with (a), or with an equivalent part approved by the Chief, Engineering and Manufacturing Branch, FAA Eastern Region. Contact the Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corporation forreplacement instructions. (c) Upon request with substantiating data submitted through an FAA maintenance inspector, the compliance time specified in this AD may be increased by the Chief, Engineering and Manufacturing Branch, FAA Eastern Region. This amendment effective December 30, 1967, for all persons except those to whom it was made effective immediately by telegram dated December 13, 1967.
2003-06-08: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that applies to all Dornier-Werke G.m.b.H. (Dornier) Model Do 27 Q-6 airplanes. This AD requires you to inspect the aileron and flap control cables for proper clearance from the fuel lines in the fuselage and make necessary adjustments; and inspect the fuel lines for damage and correct routing. This AD also requires you to replace all damaged fuel lines and reroute incorrectly routed fuel lines. After all other corrective action is taken, this AD also requires you to install protective sleeves on the fuel lines. This AD is the result of mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by the airworthiness authority for Germany. The actions specified by this AD are intended to detect and correct damaged fuel lines and prevent the potential for further damage occurring to the fuel lines in the fuselage. Damage to the fuel lines could result in fuel leaking into the fuselage, which could cause a fire or explosion.