Results
2007-24-02: The FAA is superseding an existing airworthiness directive (AD) that applies to all Model 737-100, -200, -200C, -300, -400, and -500 series airplanes. The existing AD currently requires repetitive detailed inspections for damage of the electrical wire and sleeve that run to the fuel boost pump through a conduit in the fuel tank, and arcing damage of the conduit and signs of fuel leakage into the conduit; replacement of the sleeve with a new, smaller-diameter sleeve; and related investigative and corrective actions, as applicable. This new AD reduces the inspection threshold for certain airplanes. This AD \nresults from a report of a fuel tank explosion on a Model 727-200F airplane on the ground, and a report of chafed wires and a damaged power cable sleeve of a fuel boost pump discovered during an inspection on a Model 737-300 airplane. (The fuel boost pump installation on certain Model 737 airplanes is almost identical to the installation on Model 727 airplanes.) We are issuing this AD to detect and correct chafing of the fuel boost pump electrical wiring and \nleakage of fuel into the conduit, and to prevent electrical arcing between the wiring and the surrounding conduit, which could result in arc-through of the conduit, and consequent fire or explosion of the fuel tank.\n\nDATES: This AD becomes effective December 6, 2007. \n\n\tThe Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of a certain publication listed in the AD as of December 6, 2007. \n\n\tOn June 6, 2007 (72 FR 28597, May 22, 2007), the Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-28A1263, Revision 1, dated March 19, 2007. \n\n\tWe must receive any comments on this AD by January 22, 2008.
2007-23-16: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Cessna Aircraft Company (Cessna) Model 525B airplanes. This AD requires you to incorporate electrical power relay circuit protection kit part number (P/N) SB525B-24-02. This AD results from both the need to protect aircraft wiring left unprotected in the original design and a report of a Model 525B airplane experiencing in-flight loss of numerous systems, tripped circuit breakers, and burned wiring adjacent to the power distribution panel. We are issuing this AD to correct an incorrect wiring installation and to provide short-circuit protection for all wiring from the aircraft power distribution system. This condition could result in burned wiring and loss of various aircraft electrical systems.
90-03-03: ACTION: Final rule
2007-22-04: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as: During cruise, an A330 operator experienced a LH (left-hand) wing tank pump 1 low pressure message followed immediately by LH wing tank stand-by pump low pressure message, then LH wing tank pumps low pressure message. The flight crew opened the cross- feed valve to feed the engine on LH wing from RH (right-hand) wing but RH wing tank pumps low-pressure message was displayed as well as advisory unbalanced fuel message. * * * * * * * * It has been confirmed following fuel tank entry that outlet of the LH pump 2 canister had broken due to static overload. If this situation is not corrected, it can lead to the loss of fuel on both engines in flight ** * [and] a dual engine flameout * * *. This AD requires actions that are intended to address the unsafe condition described in the MCAI.
2007-22-09: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Bombardier Model DHC-8-400 series airplanes. This AD requires an inspection to detect discrepancies of the main landing gear (MLG) system, an inspection of the jam nut of the retract actuator of the MLGs to ensure the wire lock is in place and the nut is secured, an inspection of the retract actuator for any signs of corrosion or wear, and applicable related investigative and corrective actions if necessary. This AD also requires submitting an inspection report to Bombardier. This AD results from two reports of collapse of MLGs within a few days of each other. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct potential failure of major components of the MLG assembly and attachments, which could result in the possible collapse of a MLG and consequent damage to the airplane and injury to people or damage to property on the ground.
93-10-01: 93-10-01 BOEING: Amendment 39-8580. Docket 92-NM-93-AD. Supersedes AD 93-06-03, Amendment 39-8528. \n\n\tApplicability: Model 747 series airplanes; as listed in Boeing Service Bulletin 747-52-2186, Revision 4, dated October 24, 1991, and Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2233, dated August 29, 1991; certificated in any category. \n\n\tCompliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished previously. \n\n\tTo prevent inadvertent in-flight opening of the lower lobe forward and aft cargo doors and the main deck side cargo door, if installed, accomplish the following: \n\n\t(a)\tWithin the next 1,800 flight hours after the effective date of this AD, or 600 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first: With no disassembly required, perform a detailed visual inspection to detect cracks in the portal latch pin support fittings on the lower lobe forward and aft cargo doors and on the main deck side cargo door, if installed and in the cargo configuration, inaccordance with Boeing Service Bulletin 747-52-2186, Revision 4, dated October 24, 1991. \n\n\t\t(1)\tRepeat the inspection required by this paragraph at intervals not to exceed 1,800 flight hours or 600 flight cycles, whichever occurs first. \n\n\t\t(2)\tIf any cracked part is found as a result of the inspections required by this paragraph, prior to further flight, replace it and check the door rigging, in accordance with the service bulletin. \n\n\t(b)\tWithin the next 12,500 flight hours after the effective date of this AD, or 2,500 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD, or within 30 months after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first: With no disassembly required, perform a detailed visual inspection to detect cracks in the portal latch pin support fittings on the main deck side cargo door, if installed and in the passenger configuration, in accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin 747-52-2186, Revision 4, dated October 24, 1991. \n\n\t\t(1)\tRepeat the inspectionrequired by this paragraph at intervals not to exceed 12,500 flight hours, 2,500 flight cycles, or 30 months after the immediately preceding inspection, whichever occurs first. \n\n\t\t(2)\tIf any cracked part is found as a result of the inspections required by this paragraph, prior to further flight, replace it and check the door rigging, in accordance with the service bulletin. \n\n\t(c)\tWhen converting from the passenger configuration to the cargo configuration, prior to further flight; and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 1,800 flight hours or 600 flight cycles, whichever occurs first: With no disassembly required, perform a detailed visual inspection to detect cracks in the portal latch pin support fitting assemblies of the main deck side cargo door, if installed, in accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin 747-52-2186, Revision 4, dated October 24, 1991. Prior to further flight, replace any cracked parts found, in accordance with the service bulletin. \n\n\t(d)\tWhen converting from the cargo configuration to the passenger configuration, prior to further flight; and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 12,500 flight hours, 2,500 flight cycles, or 30 months after the immediately preceding inspection, whichever occurs first: With no disassembly required, perform a detailed visual inspection to detect cracks in the portal latch pin support fitting assemblies of the main deck side cargo door, if installed, in accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin 747-52-2186, Revision 4, dated October 24, 1991. Prior to further flight, replace any cracked parts found, in accordance with the service bulletin. \n\n\t(e)\tWithin the next 25,000 flight hours after the effective date of this AD, or 5,000 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD, or within 5 years after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first, accomplish the requirements of paragraphs (e)(1), (e)(2), and (e)(3) of this AD, in accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin 747-52-2186, Revision 4, dated October 24, 1991. \n\n\t\t(1)\tDisassemble parts and perform a detailed visual inspection to detect cracks and corrosion in the portal latch pin support fitting assemblies/installations on the lower lobe forward and aft cargo doors and on the main deck side cargo door, if installed, in accordance with the service bulletin. If cracks or corrosion are found, prior to further flight, repair or replace any damaged parts, and check the door rigging, in accordance with the service bulletin. \n\n\t\t(2)\tInspect to verify that all H-11 steel latch fitting-to-sill bolts, BACB30MT, and corresponding nuts, BACN10HR( ), are intact and that unsealed bolts are free of corrosion, in accordance with the service bulletin. If not, prior to further flight, install new bolts, BACB30MT, and corresponding nuts, BACN10HR( ); or install the superseding BACB3OUS bolts and BACN10HR( )CD nuts, in accordance with the service bulletin. \n\n\t\t(3)\tApply sealant to the portal latch pin support fitting and attaching hardware, in accordance with the service bulletin. (Application of sealant to fittings and attaching hardware that previously have been sealed is not required by this paragraph.) \n\n\t(f)\tAccomplishment of paragraphs (e)(1), (e)(2), and (e)(3) of this AD constitutes terminating action for the repetitive inspections required by paragraphs (a)(1), (b)(1), (c), and (d) of this AD. \n\n\t(g)\tWithin the next 6,000 flight hours after the effective date of this AD, or within 18 months after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first: Determine the configuration of the bellcrank/cam latch assembly of the lower lobe forward and aft cargo doors and of the main deck side cargo door, if installed; and prior to further flight, perform the procedures specified in either paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this AD, as applicable, in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2233, dated August 29, 1991. \n\n\t\t(1)\tFor cargo doors with cam latches attached to the bellcrank by cross- bolts, accomplish one of the procedures specified in either paragraph (g)(1)(i), (g)(1)(ii), or (g)(1)(iii) of this AD: \n\n\t\t\t(i)\tReplace all bellcranks and cam latches with bellcranks and cam latches of the new part configuration in accordance with Section III., paragraph F., of the service bulletin; and perform an operational test of the door latch mechanism, in accordance with Section III., paragraph Y., of the service bulletin. Accomplishment of this paragraph constitutes terminating action for the requirements of paragraph (g) of this AD. Or \n\n\t\t\t(ii)\tInspect the bellcranks to detect corrosion, and repair or replace any corroded parts; and replace all cam latches with cam latches of the new part configuration; in accordance with Section III., paragraph G., of the service bulletin. Perform an operational test of the door latch mechanism in accordance with Section III., paragraph Y., of the service bulletin. Accomplishment of this paragraph constitutes terminating action for the requirements of paragraph (g) of this AD. Or \n\n\t\t\t(iii)\tInspect the bellcranks to detect corrosion, and repair or replace any corroded parts; and inspect the cam latches to detect cracks and corrosion and, prior to further flight, repair or replace any cracked or corroded parts; in accordance with Section III., paragraph H., of the service bulletin. Perform an operational test of the door latch mechanism in accordance with Section III., paragraph Y., of the service bulletin. If one or more of the cam latches are repaired and/or reinstalled as a result of the actions required by this paragraph, thereafter, repeat the inspections of the cam latches required by this paragraph at intervals not to exceed 25,000 flight hours or 5 years, whichever occurs first. \n\n\t\t(2)\tFor cargo doors with cam latches attached to the bellcrank by axial-bolts, accomplish one of the procedures specified in either paragraph (g)(2)(i) or (g)(2)(ii) of this AD: \n\n\t\t\t(i)\tReplace all cam latches that have cross-bolt holes with cam latches of the new part configuration, in accordance with Section III., paragraph I., of the service bulletin. Perform an operational test of the door latch mechanism in accordance with Section III., paragraph Y., of the service bulletin. Accomplishment of this paragraph constitutes terminating action for the requirements of paragraphs (g)(1)(iii) and (g)(2)(ii) of this AD. Or \n\n\t\t\t(ii)\tIf the cam latches do not have cross-bolt holes, they may be reinstalled. If the cam latches have cross-bolt holes, inspect those latches to detect cracks; replace any cracked cam latches; and reinstall any cam latches that are not cracked; in accordance with Section III., paragraph J., of the service bulletin. Perform an operational test of the door latch mechanism in accordance with Section III., paragraph Y., of the service bulletin. If one or more of the cam latches that have cross-bolt holes is reinstalled as a result of the actions required by this paragraph, thereafter, repeat the inspections of the cam latches required by this paragraph at intervals not to exceed 25,000 flight hours or 5 years, whichever occurs first. \n\n\t(h)\tAccomplishment of the procedures specified in either paragraph (h)(1) or (h)(2) of this AD, in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2233, dated August 29, 1991, constitutes terminating action for the requirements of paragraph (g) of this AD. \n\n\t\t(1)\tIf one or more of the cam latches on the lower lobe forward and aft cargo doors and main deck side cargo door was repaired and/or reinstalled in accordance with paragraph (g)(1)(iii) of this AD, replace those cam latches with cam latches of the new part configuration, in accordance with Section III. of the service bulletin. Prior to further flight, perform an operational test of the door latch mechanism in accordance with Section III., paragraph Y., of the service bulletin. Or \n\n\t\t(2)\tIf one or more of the cam latches that have cross-bolt holes on the lower lobe forward and aft cargo doors and main deck side cargo doors was reinstalled in accordance with paragraph (g)(2)(ii) of this AD, replace those cam latches with cam latches of the new part configuration, in accordance with Section III. of the service bulletin. Prior to further flight, perform an operational test of the door latch mechanism in accordance with Section III., paragraph Y., of the service bulletin. \n\n\tNOTE: Accomplishment of the requirements of paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2233, dated August 29, 1991, as amended by Notice of Status Change 747-52A2233 NSC 1, dated November 21, 1991; is equivalent to accomplishment of those requirements in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2233, dated August 29, 1991.\n\n\t(i)\tAn alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used if approved by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, Seattle ACO.\n \n\tNOTE: Information concerning the existence of approved alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be obtained from the Seattle ACO.\n\n\t(j)\tSpecial flight permits may be issued in accordance with FAR 21.197 and 21.199 to operate the airplane to a location where the requirements of this AD can be accomplished. \n\n\t(k)\tThe inspections, replacements, check, repairs, installation, operational tests, and sealant application shall be done in accordance with the following Boeing service bulletins, as applicable, which contain the specified effective pages: \n\n\nService Bulletin\tReferenced and Date\n\nPage Number\t\nRevision Level\tShown on Page\n Date \nShown on Page \n747-52-2186,\nRevision 4, \nOctober 24, 1991\n1-15, 19-50\t\n\n16-18\t\n4\n\n3\nOctober 24, 1991\n\nJanuary 25, 1990 \n747-52A2233,\nAugust 29, 1991\n1-76\nOriginal\nAugust 29, 1991\nNotice of Status Change\n747-52A2233 NSC 1\nNovember 21, 1991 \n1\n2\nOriginal\n(This page is not dated) \nNovember 21, 1991 \n\nThis incorporation by reference was approved previously by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR Part 51, as of May 14, 1993 (58 FR 19322, April 14, 1993). Copies may be obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC. \n\n\t(l)\tThis amendment is effective May 14, 1993.
2007-21-14: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all Airbus Model A310 series airplanes. This AD requires revising the Airworthiness Limitations Section of the Instructions for Continued Airworthiness to incorporate new limitations for fuel tank systems. This AD results from fuel system reviews conducted by the manufacturer. We are issuing this AD to prevent the potential of ignition sources inside fuel tanks, which, in combination with flammable fuel vapors caused by latent failures, alterations, repairs, or maintenance actions, could result in fuel tank explosions and consequent loss of the airplane.
2007-21-06: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for GE CF6-80C2A5F turbofan engines installed on, but not limited to, Airbus A300F4-605R airplanes. This AD requires removing previous software versions from the engine electronic control unit (ECU). Engines with new version software will have increased margin to flameout. This AD results from reports of engine flameout events during flight, including reports of events where all engines simultaneously experienced a flameout or other adverse operation. Although the root cause investigation is not yet complete, we believe that exposure to ice crystals during flight is associated with these flameout events. We are issuing this AD to minimize the potential of an all-engine flameout event caused by ice accretion and shedding during flight.
2007-21-02: The FAA adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Raytheon Aircraft Company (RAC) Models 58P and 58TC airplanes that were used as lead airplanes by the United States Forest Service (USFS). This AD establishes new limits for the structural life of the airframe (wing, fuselage, empennage, and associated structure) through the incorporation of a supplement to the Limitations Section of the pilot's operating handbook and airplane flight manual (POH/AFM). This AD results from the FAA's analysis and determination that the operational history and usage of the affected airplanes requires a reduction in the structural life limit to 4,500 hours time-in-service (TIS) for the airframe (wing, fuselage, empennage, and associated structure). We are issuing this AD to prevent structural failure of the airframe (wing, fuselage, empennage, or associated structure) based on the operational history and usage of the affected airplanes. Such failure could lead to loss of control.
2007-20-05: The FAA is superseding two existing airworthiness directives (ADs). One AD applies to all Airbus Model A319 and A320 airplanes and currently requires repetitive ultrasonic inspections to detect fatigue cracking in the wing/fuselage joint cruciform fittings, and corrective actions if necessary. The other AD applies to all Airbus Model A319, A320, and A321 airplanes and currently requires a revision to the Airworthiness Limitations section (ALS) of the Instructions for Continued Airworthiness (ICA). This new AD requires new revisions to the ALS of the ICA to incorporate service life limits for certain items and inspections to detect fatigue cracking, accidental damage, or corrosion in certain structures; and accomplishment of the repetitive ultrasonic inspections of the wing/fuselage joint cruciform fittings in accordance with the revised ALS of the ICA. This AD also adds airplanes to the applicability. This AD results from issuance of new and more restrictive service life limits and structural inspections based on fatigue testing and in-service findings. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracking, accidental damage, or corrosion in principal structural elements and to prevent failure of certain life limited parts, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the airplane.