Results
71-25-02: 71-25-02 BRITISH AIRCRAFT CORPORATION: Amdt. 39-1349 as amended by Amendment 39-1375. Applies to Model BAC 1-11 200 and 400 series airplanes. Compliance is required as indicated. To prevent failures of the flap beam bracket to wing attachments due to loose or failed attachment bolts through the wing lower skin at flap beam locations 2, 3, 4, accomplish the following: (a) For 200 and 400 series airplanes which do not have parallel shank bolts installed in accordance with paragraph (h)(2) of AD 70-18-1 or do not have BAC Modification PM 3065(b), PM 4407 Part A5 or A6, or PM 4790(c) incorporated, at flap beam locations 2 (both L.H. and R.H.), within the next 50 landings after the effective date of this AD, unless already accomplished within the last 450 landings, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 500 landings from the last inspection, inspect the six flap beam bracket attachment bolts through the wing lower skin at each affected flap beam location 2 for looseness orfailure in accordance with paragraph (h). (b) For 200 series airplanes which do not have paralleled shank bolts installed in accordance with paragraph (h)(2) of AD 70-18-1 or do not have BAC Modification PM 3065(d), PM 4407 Part A7 or A8, or PM 4790(c) incorporated, at flap beam locations 3 (both L.H. and R.H.), within the next 50 landings after the effective date of this AD, unless already accomplished within the last 950 landings, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 1,000 landings from the last inspection, inspect the four flap beam bracket attachment bolts through the wing lower skin at each affected flap beam location 3 for looseness or failure in accordance with paragraph (h). (c) For 200 series airplanes which do not have paralleled shank bolts installed in accordance with paragraph (h)(2) of AD 70-18-1 or do not have BAC Modification PM 3216, PM 4407 Part A11 or A12, or PM 4790(c) incorporated, at flap beam locations 4 (both L.H. and R.H.), within the next 50 landings after the effective date of this AD, unless already accomplished within the last 950 landings, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 1,000 landings from the last inspection, inspect the four flap beam bracket attachment bolts through the wing lower skin at each affected flap beam location 4 for looseness or failure in accordance with paragraph (h). NOTE: An inspection accomplished at a flap beam location in accordance with paragraph (a), (b), or (c) of AD 70-18-1 prior to the effective date of this AD may be considered to meet the initial inspection required by paragraph (a), (b), or (c), respectively, of this AD. (d) For 200 and 400 series airplanes which have an applicable Part A5, A6, A7, A8, A9, A10, A11, or A12 of BAC Modification PM 4407, or PM 3216 incorporated at a flap beam locations 2, 3, or 4 (both L.H. and R.H.), within the next 50 landings after the effective date of this AD or before the accumulation of 450 landings after incorporating BAC Modification PM 3216 or PM 4407 at an affected flap beam location, whichever occurs later, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 500 landings from the last inspection, inspect the flap beam bracket attachment bolts through the wing lower skin at each affected flap beam location for looseness or failure in accordance with paragraph (h). (e) If failed or loose bolts through the wing lower skin are found during an inspection required by paragraph (a), (b), (c), or (d) comply with subparagraph (1), (2), or (3). (1) If more than one failed or loose bolt are found on any bracket, before further flight, except that the airplane may be flown in accordance with FAR 21.197 to a base where the repairs or modifications can be performed, comply with paragraphs (i), (j), and (k). (2) If no more than one failed or loose bolt on each bracket at any flap beam location if found, before further flight, except that the airplane may be flown in accordance with FAR 21.197 to a base where the repairs ormodifications can be performed, comply with paragraphs (i) and (j) and either- (i) Comply with paragraph (k); or (ii) Replace each failed or loose bolt with a new taper bolt of the same part number or with a parallel shank bolt having a material strength of 140,000 to 165,000 p.s.i. and having a diameter compatible with the maximum diameter of the replaced taper bolt and within the next 300 landings after replacing the failed or loose bolt comply with paragraphs (i), (j), and (k). (3) If no failed bolt and no more than one loose bolt is found at any flap beam location, before further flight, except that the airplane may be flown in accordance with FAR 21.197 to a base where the repairs or modifications can be performed, comply with paragraphs (i) and (j) and either - (i) Comply with paragraph (k); or (ii) Leave the loose bolt in service and within the next 300 landings after finding the loose bolt comply with paragraphs (i), (j), and (k). (f) For 200 and400 series airplanes which have any parallel shank bolts installed at a flap beam location as a repair for any failed or loose flap beam bracket attachment bolts through the wing lower skin in accordance with paragraph (h)(2) of AD 70-18-1, comply with the following: (1) At each affected flap beam location inspect all the flap beam bracket attachment bolts through the wing lower skin for failure or looseness in accordance with paragraph (h) as indicated below: (i) For airplanes with 1,200 or more landings on an affected flap beam location since the installation of the parallel shank bolts, within the next 25 landings after the effective date of this AD unless already accomplished within the last 25 landings, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 50 landings from the last inspection until paragraph (k) is complied with. (ii) For airplanes with 900 or more but less than 1,200 landings on an affected flap beam location since the installation of the parallel shank bolts, within the next 50 landings after the effective date of this AD unless already accomplished within the last 50 landings, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 100 landings from the last inspection until paragraph (k) is complied with. (iii) For airplanes with less than 900 landings on an affected flap beam location since the installation of the parallel shank bolts, within the next 50 landings after the effective date of this AD unless already accomplished within the last 250 landings, or before the accumulation of 300 landings on the affected flap beam location, whichever occurs later. (2) If any failed or loose bolts are found during an inspection required by this paragraph before further flight, except that the airplane may be flown in accordance with FAR 21.197 to a base where the repairs or modifications can be performed, comply with paragraphs (i), (j), and (k). (3) Within the next 300 landings after the effective date of this AD comply with paragraphs (i), (j), and (k) at each affected flap beam location. (g) For 200 and 400 series airplanes, at those flap beam locations 2, 3, or 4 at which replacement bolts were installed or loose bolts were left in service as provided by paragraphs (d)(1) and (f)(2) of AD 70-18-1, as amended, comply with the following: (1) For flap beam locations at which a loose bolt or replacement bolt is still in service, before the accumulation of 300 landings on the loose bolt or replacement bolt comply with paragraphs (i), (j), and (k). (2) For flap beam locations at which a loose bolt or replacement bolt has been removed from service through modifications performed in accordance with paragraph (h) of AD 70-18-1, comply with paragraphs (i) and (j), unless already accomplished at the time of such modifications or subsequent thereto, as indicated below: (i) For flap beam locations modified in accordance with paragraph (h)(1) of AD 70-18-1, at the first inspection required by paragraph (d).(ii) For flap beam locations modified in accordance with paragraph (h)(2) of AD 70-18-1, at the first inspection required by paragraph (f). (iii) For flap beam locations modified in accordance with paragraph (h)(3) of AD 70-18-1, within the next 100 landings after the effective date of this AD. (h) Inspect the flap beam bracket attachment bolts through the wing lower skin for failure or looseness by applying a load to the nut on each bolt to ensure that the bolt has not failed or is not loose. NOTE: The inspection for security of the taper bolts cannot be adequately carried out at the bolt head because the shallow taper might maintain the bolt shank tight in spite of failure at the thread undercut. (i) At each affected flap beam location accomplish the following: (1) Visually inspect the two lower horizontal attachment bolts (one on each side of the flange) which pass through the forward flange of the flap beam attachment bracket and the rear spar lower boom angle for failure or looseness. (2) Visually inspect the wing structure in the area of the affected flap beam location for damage or fuel leaks. (3) If any failed or loose horizontal bolts or any damage to the wing structure or any fuel leaks are found during an inspection required by this paragraph, before further flight, except that the airplane may be flown in accordance with FAR 21.197 to a base where the repairs can be performed, replace the failed or loose horizontal bolts, repair the damage to the wing structure, and seal the fuel leaks. (j) At each affected flap beam location accomplish the following: (1) Visually inspect both flap beam attachment brackets for cracks in the webs or flanges. NOTE: Particular attention should be given to Type A and Type B cracks as shown in Figure 1 of British Aircraft Corporation Service Newsletter 57/7, Issue 1, dated April 27, 1970. (2) If a crack is found during an inspection required by this paragraph, before further flight, except that the airplane may be flown in accordance with FAR 21.197 to a base where the repairs can be performed, comply with ARB-approved instructions from the Service Manager, British Aircraft Corporation, Weybridge, Surrey, England, or an FAA-approved equivalent. (k) At each affected flap beam location replace all the flap beam bracket attachment bolts through the wing lower skin with new increased diameter BAC Modification PM 4790(c) parallel shank bolts in accordance with Part C of British Aircraft Corporation Model BAC 1-11 Service Bulletin No. 57-PM 4790 dated March 1, 1971, or an FAA-approved equivalent. (l) The repetitive inspection required by this AD may be discontinued at each flap beam location where the modifications specified by paragraph (k) have been incorporated. NOTE: These modifications may be accomplished in complying with Amendment 39- 1348. (m) For the purpose of complying with this AD, subject to acceptance by the assigned FAA maintenance inspector, the number of landings may be determined by dividing each airplane's hours' time in service by the operator's fleet average time from takeoff to landing for BAC 1-11 200 and 400 series airplanes. (n) Upon request of the operator, an FAA maintenance inspector, subject to prior approval of the Chief, Aircraft Certification Staff, FAA Europe, Africa, and Middle East Region may adjust the repetitive inspection intervals specified in paragraphs (a), (b), (c), and (d) of this AD to permit compliance at an established inspection period of the operator if the request contains substantiating data to justify the increase for that operator. Amendment 39-1349 superseded Amendment 39-1073 (35 F.R. 13879), AD 70-18-1, as amended by Amendment 39-1184 (36 F.R. 5976). Amendment 39-1349 became effective November 30, 1971. This Amendment 39-1375 becomes effective upon publication in the Federal Register.
2006-18-11: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Boeing Model 737-200, -300, -400, and -500 series airplanes equipped with an auxiliary fuel system installed in accordance with STC SA83NE, SA1078NE, SA725NE, ST00040NY, or ST01337NY. This AD requires a one-time deactivation of the auxiliary fuel system, repetitive venting of the auxiliary fuel tanks, and revising the Limitations section of the airplane flight manual to limit the maximum cargo weight. This AD results from a re-evaluation of the floor structure and cargo barriers conducted by the STC holder. We are issuing this AD to prevent structural overload of the auxiliary fuel tank support structure, which could cause the floor beams to fail and resultant damage to the primary flight controls and the auxiliary power unit fuel lines that pass through the floor beams, and consequent loss of control of the airplane. We are also issuing this AD to prevent structural overload of the cargo barriers, which couldcause the barriers to fail, allowing the cargo to shift, resulting in possible damage to the auxiliary fuel tanks, residual fuel leakage, and consequent increased risk of a fire.
59-02-02: 59-02-02 DOUGLAS: Applies to All DC-7 Series Aircraft. \n\n\tCompliance required as indicated. \n\n\tThere have been several incidents of the engine cowling moving forward in flight and striking the propeller. This has been caused by incorrect installation of the cowling on its mountings. In order to prevent incorrect installation of the cowling, more positive means of indexing and aligning must be provided. Pending installation of these means, special inspections are established. \n\n\t(1)\tEffective at next cowl removal, unless modification per paragraph (2) has already been accomplished, perform a special inspection each time any segment of cowl is removed and replaced to assure that cowl indexing means are in satisfactory condition and that cowling is properly positioned. \n\n\t(2)\tNot later than November 1, 1959, install improved supports for indexing and aligning the top left and right-hand cowling segments of each of the four powerplants. Douglas Service Bulletin No. 131 dated August 21, 1956, revised February 5, 1958, covers an acceptable means of accomplishing this change.
2021-08-10: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all The Boeing Company Model DC-10-10, DC-10-10F, DC-10-15, DC-10-30, DC- 10-30F (KC-10A and KDC-10), DC-10-40 \n\n((Page 20449)) \n\nand DC-10-40F airplanes; and Model MD-10-10F and MD-10-30F airplanes. This AD was prompted by a report that an operator found a crack in the upper flange of the pylon aft bulkhead bracket. This AD requires a general visual inspection of the left and right wing pylon at the aft bulkhead bracket for any lockbolt and collar; repetitive surface and open hole eddy current high frequency (ETHF) inspections of the left and right wing pylon at the aft bulkhead bracket for any cracking; and applicable on-condition actions. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
2018-18-17: We are superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2016-13-06, which applied to certain Saab AB, Saab Aeronautics Model 340A (SAAB/ SF340A) and SAAB 340B airplanes. AD 2016-13-06 required a revision of the applicable airplane flight manual (AFM), repetitive inspections of the horizontal stabilizer de-icing boots, and applicable corrective actions. This AD continues to require a revision of the applicable AFM, repetitive inspections of the horizontal stabilizer de-icing boots, and applicable corrective actions. This AD also requires replacement of single stitched de-icing boots with improved double stitched boots, and re-identification of the modified horizontal stabilizer leading edge. This AD was prompted by reports of ruptured horizontal stabilizer de- icing boots. We are issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
2018-18-11: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for Airbus Helicopters Model AS-365N2 and AS 365 N3 helicopters with a lower strobe light installed. This AD requires installing a cable mount, inspecting the lower strobe light wiring harness, and re-routing the wiring harness. This AD was prompted by reports of interference between the lower strobe light wiring harness and the helicopter structure. The actions of this AD are intended to prevent an unsafe condition on these helicopters.
2021-08-18: The FAA is superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2021-04-16 which applied to certain Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation (Sikorsky) Model S-92A helicopters. AD 2021-04-16 required a one-time inspection of the landing gear for components with non-conforming threads and removal of any non-conforming threaded hinge pin and main landing gear (MLG) and nose landing gear (NLG) actuator pins. AD 2021-04-16 also prohibited installing certain part-numbered hinge and actuator pins on any helicopter. This AD requires the same actions but corrects erroneous part numbers. This AD was prompted by the discovery that certain part numbers listed in AD 2021-04-16 are incorrect. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
2006-19-04: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Honeywell COM units and transponders, installed on but not limited to certain transport category airplanes. This AD requires a revision to the Normal Procedures section of the airplane flight manual to advise the flightcrew to check the status of the transponder after changing the air traffic control (ATC) code. This AD also requires replacing certain identification plate(s) with new plate(s), testing certain COM units or transponders as applicable, and corrective action if necessary. For certain airplanes, this AD requires replacing the transponders of certain COM units with new or modified transponders. For certain other airplanes, this AD requires installing a modification into certain transponders. This AD results from the transponder erroneously going into standby mode if the flightcrew takes longer than five seconds when using the rotary knob of the radio management unit to change the ATC code. We are issuing this AD to prevent the transponder of the COM unit from going into standby mode, which could increase the workload on the flightcrew and result in improper functioning of the traffic alert and collision avoidance system.
2021-07-16: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Leonardo S.p.a. Model AB412 helicopters. This AD was prompted by a cracked spiral bevel gear. This AD requires a one-time visual inspection and a recurring fluorescent magnetic particle inspection (FMPI) of affected spiral bevel gears for a crack, and depending on the inspection results, removing the spiral bevel gear from service. This AD also prohibits installing an affected spiral bevel gear unless it has recently passed an FMPI. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
2018-17-13: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG (RRD) Tay 620-15 turbofan engines. This AD was prompted by reports of low-pressure compressor (LPC) fan blade retention lug failures. This AD requires reviewing the engine maintenance records and replacing the LPC fan blade with a part eligible for installation if the dry-film lubricant (DFL) treatment limit is exceeded. We are issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.