Aircraft-logs.com

Results
2009-09-02: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as: Several reports have been received on failures of the aft hinge of the main landing gear (MLG) forward stabilizer brace. Laboratory examinations have found that the fatigue cracks were initiated from the dowel pin hole at the aft hinge lug of the MLG forward stabilizer brace where the stop bracket is attached. Failure of the stabilizer brace could result in the collapse of the main landing gear. This AD requires actions that are intended to address the unsafe condition described in the MCAI.
95-12-14: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Fokker Model F28 Mark 0100 series airplanes, that requires an inspection to determine the adequacy of clearance between the normal maximum (second) detent for the reverse thrust control and the surrounding moving parts, and to detect chafing or damage of the detent. This amendment also requires eventual replacement of the normal maximum detent with an improved detent. This amendment is prompted by a report indicating that an inadequate level of clearance between the normal maximum detent and the surrounding parts may exist on earlier production Model F28 Mark 0100 series airplanes. The actions specified by this AD are intended to ensure proper operation of the normal maximum detent for reverse thrust control.
91-14-09: 91-14-09 FOKKER: Amendment 39-7050. Docket No. 91-NM-57-AD. Applicability: Model F-28 Mark 0100 series airplanes, Serial Numbers 11268 through 11273, 11276, 11278, and 11280, certificated in any category. Compliance: Required prior to the accumulation of 6,000 landings or 3 years since new, whichever occurs first, unless previously accomplished. To prevent reduced structural integrity of the fuselage, accomplish the following: A. Install four rivets in the shear plate on Frame Station 20320 at Stringer 59, in accordance with Fokker Service Bulletin F100-53-048, dated November 29, 1990. B. An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the compliance time, which provides an acceptable level of safety, may be used when approved by the Manager, Standardization Branch, ANM- 113, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. NOTE: The request should be forwarded through an FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may concur or comment and then send it to theManager, Standardization Branch, ANM-113, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. C. Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with FAR 21.197 and 21.199 to operate airplanes to a base in order to comply with the requirements of this AD. D. The installation requirements shall be done in accordance with Fokker Service Bulletin F100-53-048, dated November 29, 1990. This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR Part 51. Copies may be obtained from Fokker Aircraft USA, Inc., 1199 North Fairfax Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 1100 L Street N.W., Room 8401, Washington, D.C. This amendment (39-7050, AD 91-14-09) becomes effective on August 6, 1991.
2021-19-19: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain The Boeing Company Model 737-9 airplanes. This AD was prompted by a report of missing sealant on the left and right wing leading edge outboard blowout door. This AD requires doing a fluid seal contact inspection and a detailed inspection for missing sealant on each blowout door and applying sealant if necessary. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
2021-16-18: The FAA is superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2020-21- 05, which applied to all Airbus SAS Model A330-200 Freighter, A330-200, A330-300, A330-900, A340-200, A340-300, A340-500, and A340-600 series airplanes. AD 2020-21-05 required repetitive inspections of certain fuel pumps for cavitation erosion, replacement if necessary, revision of the operator's minimum equipment list (MEL), and accomplishment of certain maintenance actions related to defueling and ground fuel transfer operations. This AD retains the requirements of AD 2020-21-05, revises certain compliance times, and expands the applicability; as specified in a European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD, which is incorporated by reference. This AD was prompted by reports of a fuel pump showing cavitation erosion that exposed the fuel pump power supply wires, and by a determination that certain compliance times need to be revised and that additional airplanes are subject to the unsafe condition. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
90-17-20: 90-17-20 BOEING: Amendment 39-6707. Docket No. 90-NM-150-AD. \n\n\tApplicability: Model 737 series airplanes, listed in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737- 57A1079, Revision 4, dated May 10, 1990, certificated in any category. \n\n\tCompliance: Required as indicated, unless previously accomplished. \n\n\tTo prevent the loss of the outboard flap, accomplish the following: \n\n\tA.\tWithin the next 250 hours time-in-service after the effective date of this AD, unless already accomplished within the last 750 hours time-in-service, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 1,000 hours time-in-service from the last inspection, accomplish a torque check of the 5/16-inch bolts that attach the forward support fitting of the inboard and outboard flap tracks of the outboard flap, in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-57A1079, Revision 4, dated May 10, 1990. \n\n\tB.\tBolts which either fail or do not sustain the torque check must be replaced prior to further flight, in accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin 737-57A1079, Revision 4, dated May 10, 1990. \n\n\t\t1.\tIf the replacement bolt is a 5/16-inch bolt, accomplish the torque check required by paragraph A. of this AD prior to the accumulation of 5,000 hours time-in-service, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 1,000 hours time-in-service from the last inspection. \n\n\t\t2.\tIf the replacement bolt is a 3/8-inch stainless steel bolt, no further torque checks, in accordance with this AD, are necessary. \n\n\tD.\tReplacement of 5/16-inch diameter bolts with 3/8-inch diameter stainless steel bolts, in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-57A1079, Revision 4, dated May 10, 1990, or earlier revisions, constitutes terminating action for the requirements of this AD. \n\n\tE.\tAn alternate means of compliance or adjustment of the compliance time, which provides an acceptable level of safety, may be used when approved by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. \n\n\tNOTE: The request should be submitted directly to the Manager, Seattle ACO, and a copy sent to the cognizant FAA Principal Inspector (PI). The PI will than forward comments or concurrence to the Seattle ACO. \n\n\tF.\tSpecial flight permits may be issued in accordance with FAR 21.197 and 21.199 to operate airplanes to a base in order to comply with the requirements of this AD. \n\n\tAll persons affected by this directive who have not already received the appropriate service information from the manufacturer may obtain copies upon request to Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124. This information may be examined at the FAA, Northwest Mountain Region, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, S.W., Renton, Washington. \n\n\tAirworthiness Directive 90-17-20 supersedes AD 74-19-05, Amendment 39-1958. \n\tThis amendment (39-6707, AD 90-17-20) becomes effective on September 4, 1990.
90-25-03: 90-25-03 BOEING: Amendment 39-6787. Docket No. 89-NM-268-AD. \n\n\tApplicability: All Model 727 series airplanes, certificated in any category. \n\n\tCompliance: Required as indicated, unless previously accomplished. \n\n\tNOTE: This AD references Boeing Document Number D6-54929, "Aging Airplane Corrosion Prevention and Control Program, Model 727," Revision A, dated July 28, 1989, for inspection procedures, compliance times, and reporting requirements. In addition, this AD specifies inspection and reporting requirements beyond those included in the Document. Where there are differences between the AD and the Document, the AD prevails. \n\n\tTo control corrosion, accomplish the following: \n\n\tA.\tWithin one year after the effective date of this AD, revise the FAA-approved maintenance program to include the corrosion control program specified in Boeing Document Number D6-54929, "Aging Airplane Corrosion Prevention and Control Program, Model 727," Revision A, dated July 28, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as "the Document"). \n\n\tNOTE: All structure found corroded or cracked as a result of an inspection conducted in accordance with this paragraph must be addressed in accordance with FAR Part 43. \n\n\tNOTE: Where non-destructive inspection (NDI) methods are employed, in accordance with Section 4.1 of the Document, the standards and procedures used must be acceptable to the Administrator in accordance with FAR 43.13. \n\n\tNOTE: Procedures identified in the Document as "optional" are not required to be accomplished by this AD. \n\n\tB.\t1.\tIf, as a result of any inspection conducted in accordance with the program required by paragraph A., above, Level 3 corrosion is determined to exist in any area, accomplish one of the following within 7 days after such determination: \n\n\t\t\ta.\tSubmit a report of any findings of Level 3 corrosion to the Manager of the Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO) and inspect the affected area on all Model 727 aircraft in the operator's fleet; or \n\n\t\t\tb.\tSubmit for approval to the Manager of the Seattle ACO one of the following: \n\n\t\t\t\t(1)\tProposed adjustments to the schedule for performing the tasks in that area on remaining airplanes in the operator's fleet, which are adequate to ensure that any other Level 3 corrosion is detected in a timely manner, along with substantiating data for those adjustments; or \n\n\t\t\t\t(2)\tData substantiating that the Level 3 corrosion found is an isolated occurrence and that no such adjustments are necessary. \n\n\tNOTE: Notwithstanding the provision of Section 1.1. of the Document that would permit corrosion that otherwise meets the definition of Level 3 corrosion (i.e., which is determined to be a potentially urgent airworthiness concern requiring expeditious action) to be treated as Level 1 if the operator finds that it "can be attributed to an event not typical of the operator's usage of other airplanes in the same fleet," this paragraph requires that data substantiating any such finding be submitted to the FAA for approval.\n\n\tNOTE: As used throughout this AD, where documents are to be submitted to the Manager of the Seattle ACO, the document should be submitted directly to the Manager, Seattle ACO, and a copy sent to the cognizant FAA Principal Inspector (PI). The PI will then forward comments or concurrence to the Seattle ACO. The Seattle ACO will not respond to the operator without the PI's comments or concurrence.\n \n\t\t2.\tThe FAA may impose adjustments other than those proposed, upon a finding that such adjustments are necessary to ensure that any other Level 3 corrosion is detected in a timely manner. \n\n\t\t3.\tPrior to the compliance time specified for the first task required in the adjusted schedule approved under paragraph B.1. or B.2. of this AD, revise the FAA-approved maintenance program to include those adjustments. \n\n\t\tNOTE: The reporting requirements of this paragraph and of paragraph D., below, do not relieve operators from reporting corrosion as required by FAR Section 121.703. \n\n\tC.\tTo accommodate unanticipated scheduling requirements, it is acceptable for a repeat inspection interval to be increased by up to 10% but not to exceed 6 months. The cognizant FAA Principal Inspector (PI) must be informed, in writing, of any extension. \n\n\tNOTE: Except as provided in this paragraph, notwithstanding Section 3.1., paragraph 4, of the Document, all extensions to any compliance time must be approved by the Manager of the Seattle ACO.\n \n\tD.\tReport forms for Level 2 corrosion and a follow-up report for Level 3 corrosion must be submitted at least quarterly in accordance with Section 5.0 of the Document. \n\n\tE.\tIf the repeat inspection or task intervals of an operator's existing corrosion inspection program are shorter than the corresponding intervals in Section 4.3 of the Document, they may not be increased without specific approval of the Manager of the Seattle ACO. \n\n\tF.\tBefore any airplane that is subject to thisAD can be added to an air carrier's operations specifications, a program for the accomplishment of tasks required by this AD must be established in accordance with the following: \n\n\t\t1.\tFor airplanes that have previously been operated under an FAA-approved maintenance program, the initial task on each area to be accomplished by the new operator must be accomplished in accordance with the previous operator's schedule or with the new operator's schedule, whichever would result in the earlier accomplishment date for that task. After each task has been performed once, each subsequent task must be performed in accordance with the new operator's schedule. \n\n\t\t2.\tFor airplanes that have not previously been operated under an FAA-approved maintenance program, each initial task required by this AD must be accomplished either prior to the airplane's being added to the air carrier's operations specifications, or in accordance with a schedule approved by the Manager, Seattle ACO. \n\tG.\tIf corrosion is found to exceed Level 1 on any inspection after the initial inspection, the corrosion control program for the affected area must be reviewed and means implemented to reduce corrosion to Level 1 or better. \n\n\t\t1.\tWithin 60 days after such a finding, if corrective action is necessary to reduce future findings of corrosion to Level 1 or better, such proposed corrective action must be submitted for approval to the Manager, Seattle ACO. \n\n\t\t2.\tWithin 30 days after the corrective action is approved, revise the FAA-approved maintenance program to include the approved corrective action. \n\n\tH.\tAn alternate means of compliance or adjustment of the compliance time, which provides an acceptable level of safety, may be used when approved by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. \n\n\tNOTE: The request should be submitted directly to the Manager, Seattle ACO, and a copy sent to the cognizant FAA Principal Inspector (PI). The PI will then forward comments or concurrence to the Seattle ACO.\n\n\tI.\tSpecial flight permits may be issued in accordance with FAR 21.197 and 21.199 to operate airplanes to a base in order to comply with the requirements of this AD. \n\n\tThe requirements shall be done in accordance with Boeing Document Number D6-54929, "Aging Airplane Corrosion Prevention and Control Program, Model 727," Revision A, dated July 28, 1989. This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR Part 51. Copies may be obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, Northwest Mountain Region, 1601 Lind Avenue S.W., 5th Floor, Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 1100 L Street N.W., Room 8301, Washington, D.C. \n\n\tThis amendment (39-6787, AD 90-25-03) becomes effective on December 31, 1990.
73-14-01: 73-14-01 BOEING: Amdt. 39-1682. Applies to all Model 707 airplanes manufactured prior to December 1, 1967, with non-shot peened 7079-T6 main deck cargo door latch support fittings. \n\tCompliance required as indicated. \n\t(a)\tWithin the next 1500 hours' time in service after the effective date of this AD and at intervals thereafter not to exceed 1500 hours' time in service, inspect the main deck cargo door latch support fittings per (b) below. Airplanes with a cracked fitting may be operated in accordance with paragraph (d) or (e) below or the cracked fitting may be replaced in accordance with paragraph (c). \n\t(b)\tInspect in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 3124, dated January 29, 1973, or later FAA approved revisions, or in a manner approved by the Chief, Engineering and Manufacturing Branch, F.A.A., Northwest Region, for cracks emanating from the barrel nut hole on each of the eight fittings using visual, or dye penetrant, or eddy current methods. \n\t(c)\tIf cracks are found emanating from the barrel nut hole, replace with a shot-peened 7079-T6 fitting; or replace with a 7075-T73 fitting; or repair in a manner approved by the Chief, Engineering and Manufacturing Branch, F.A.A., Northwest Region, prior to further flight. \n\t(d)\tIf cracks are found emanating from the barrel nut hole on any one of the two most forward or two most aft fittings, the airplane may be continued in service if flown unpressurized and the inspections per (f) are accomplished. \n\t(e)\tAirplanes with not more than one of the four center fittings cracked at the barrel nut hole, may be continued in service at a reduced cabin operating pressure, of not more than 6.0 psi cabin pressure differential, provided the inspections per (f) are accomplished. \n\t(f)\tWhen required by (d) or (e) all fittings must be re-inspected at intervals not to exceed 200 hours' time in service in accordance with (b) above. If crack growth occurs or if additional fittings are found cracked at the barrel nuthole, replace the cracked fittings prior to further flight. \n\t(g)\tThe installation of either shot peened 7079-T6 fittings or 7075-T73 fittings is terminating action for this AD. \n\t(h)\tUpon request of the operator, a FAA maintenance inspector, subject to prior approval of the Chief, Engineering and Manufacturing Branch, FAA, Northwest Region, may adjust the repetitive inspection intervals if the request contains substantiating data to justify the increase. \n\t(i)\tAircraft having fittings which require rework under this AD may be flown unpressurized in accordance with FAR 21.197, to a base where rework can be accomplished. \n\tThis AD, Amendment 39-1682, supersedes AD 73-4-1. \n\tThis Amendment 39-1682 becomes effective upon date of publication.
73-19-02: 73-19-02 BELL: Amdt. 39-1717. Applies to Bell Models 47B, 47B-3, 47D, 47D-1, 47E, 47G, 47G-2 and 47H-1 helicopters certificated in all categories. Compliance required as indicated. To prevent possible fatigue failure of the tail rotor yoke, P/N 47-641-057-9, remove and replace tail rotor yokes having S/N N29-1246 through N29-1266, N29-1298 through N29-1452, N29-10453 through N29-10488, and N29-10501 through N29-10525, as specified below. (a) Replace those yokes with 390 or more hours total time in service on the effective date of this AD, within 10 hours time in service. (b) Replace those yokes with less than 390 hours total time in service on the effective date of this AD, prior to accumulating 400 hours total time in service. The requirements of this AD do not affect other Model 47 series helicopter tail rotor yokes. (Bell Helicopter Co. Service Bulletin No. 47-05-73-1 dated August 22, 1973 pertains to this subject.) This amendment becomes effective to owners and operators on receipt of the mailed amendment and becomes effective to all other persons on September 14, 1973.
91-10-11: 91-10-11 McDONNELL DOUGLAS: Amendment 39-6996. Docket No. 90-NM-288-AD. Supersedes AD 90-20-09. \n\n\tApplicability: Model DC-9-80 (MD-80) series airplanes and Model MD-88 airplanes, serial numbers as listed in McDonnell Douglas MD-80 Service Bulletin A27-313, dated August 3, 1990, certificated in any category. \n\n\tCompliance: Required as indicated, unless previously accomplished. To prevent degradation of airplane flight handling qualities, accomplish the following: \n\n\tA.\tWithin 14 days after October 5, 1990 (the effective date of Amendment 39-6746, AD 90-20-09), and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 60 days, inspect the four bolts of the flight controls which attach the elevator variable load feel torque tube to the elevator variable load feel mechanism for loose or missing bolts and nuts, in accordance with Phase 1 of the Accomplishment Instructions of McDonnell Douglas Alert Service Bulletin A27-313, dated August 3, 1990. \n\n\tB.\tAny discrepancies found during the inspections required by paragraph A. of this AD must be corrected prior to further flight, in accordance with Phase 1 of the Accomplishment Instructions of McDonnell Douglas Alert Service Bulletin A27-313, dated August 3, 1990. \n\n\tC.\tWithin 6 months after the effective date of this AD, modify the flight controls elevator variable load feel torque tube attachment to the elevator variable load feel mechanism by replacing the three self-locking bolts/nuts and one non-locking bolt with three castellated nut/bolts and one bolt with a drilled head for safety wire, in accordance with Phase 2 of the Accomplishment Instructions of McDonnell Douglas Alert Service Bulletin A27-313, dated August 3, 1990. Such installation constitutes terminating action for the repetitive inspections required by paragraph A. of this AD. \n\n\tD.\tAn alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the compliance time, which provides an acceptable level of safety, may be used when approved by the Manager, Los AngelesAircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. \n\n\tNOTE: The request should be forwarded through an FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may concur or comment and then send it to the Manager, Los Angeles ACO. \n\n\tE.\tSpecial flight permits may be issued in accordance with FAR 21.197 and 21.199 to operate airplanes to a base in order to comply with the requirements of this AD. \n\n\tAll persons affected by this directive who have not already received the appropriate service documents from the manufacturer may obtain copies upon request to Douglas Aircraft Company, P.O. Box 1771, Long Beach, California 90801, ATTN: Business Unit Manager, Technical Services, Mail Code 73-30. These documents may be examined at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue S.W., Renton, Washington; or the Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3229 East Spring Street, Long Beach, California. \n\n\tThis amendment supersedes Amendment 39-6746, AD 90-20-09.This amendment (39-6996, AD 91-10-11) becomes effective on June 18, 1991.