Results
96-08-08: This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to all Airbus Model A300 series airplanes (excluding Model A300 B4-600 series airplanes), that currently requires certain structural inspections and modifications. This amendment requires additional structural inspections and modifications that have been identified as necessary to ensure the structural integrity of these airplanes as they approach their economic design goal. This amendment also excludes additional airplanes from the applicability of the AD. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent degradation of the structural capability of the affected airplanes.
2018-23-01: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Zodiac Seats France 536 Series Cabin Attendant Seats. This AD was prompted by cracks found in a highly concentrated stress area of the seat pan hinges. This AD requires repetitive inspections and replacement of the seat pan. We are issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
58-14-01: 58-14-01 SUD AVIATION: Applies to All Alouette II SE 3130 Helicopters Equipped With Tail Rotor Blade Model Numbers 34.20.000, 34.20.000.50, 34.20.000.51, and 34.30.000. Compliance required prior to next flight and each 5 hours of operation thereafter. Two cases of defective bonding at the outboard end of the root end side plates of the tail rotor blades have been found. In order to preclude any possible fatigue failures of the blade, Sud Aviation has issued the following corrective measures which the French SGACC considers mandatory: Inspection A. Blades with rigid flapping restrainer. (Aircraft Numbers 1137 and above or aircraft incorporating modification V.14.) 1. Saturate with turbine oil (Spec. AIR 3512 or DED 2479/6, Shell turbine oil No. 9 or Esso aviation oil No. 57) the edge of the side plate and the bead of adhesive at the outboard end of the side plate. 2. Move blade to and from by pushing and pulling blade tip alternately four or five timesrespectively, applying a load of approximately 13 lb. (check with spring balance). 3. In the case of a defective blade, the oil will flow in and out and, at the same time, air bubbles may be produced. 4. If in doubt, wipe the side plate and repeat the above loading procedure. B. Blades with earlier type flapping restrainer. (Aircraft Numbers 1136 and below which do not incorporate modification V.14.) The previously described inspection procedure cannot be applied without risking distortion of the flapping restrainers. The procedure may, however, be applied if the blades are removed and are clamped in a vise over the two inboard blade-cuff retaining bolts (bolts nearest root end of blade). To avoid blade removal and inspection in a vise, the tools may be fabricated in order to rigidly support the blade root on the helicopter. The tools can simply consist of a wood block cut to proper length so as to rest at one end against the two tail gearbox nutsand at the other end against the blade-cuff bolts. To hold the blade in the other direction, strap the blade and the tail gearbox housing as shown in the sketch in the referenced Service Bulletin, using a cable cut to the proper length or, alternatively, a non-elastic strap. The inspection procedure is the same as previously described. C. Defective blades shall be retired from service immediately. Others may be left in service as long as the bonding is satisfactory up to a maximum of 300 hours. The FAA concurs with this action and considers compliance there with mandatory. (Sud Aviation Helicopter Service Bulletin No. AL 34.11.131/A covers the same subject.) This supersedes AD 58-13-04.
55-16-02: 55-16-02 MARTIN: Applies to Models 202, 202A, and 404 Aircraft Equipped With Hamilton Standard Propellers. Compliance required by first scheduled engine change after November 1, 1955, but not later than November 1, 1956. To increase the fire-resistance integrity of the propeller feathering system against damage by a powerplant fire, all flexible hose components of propeller feathering lines forward of the firewall must be replaced with lines and fittings which will meet current fire-resistant requirements. The following hose assemblies are considered acceptable for this application: (a) Aeroquip 680-12S hose assemblies with Aeroquip 304 protective sleeves over end fittings (Aeroquip assembly P/N 304000-12S). (b) Resistoflex SSFR-3800-10 hose assemblies utilizing -12 connections. (c) Aeroquip 309009-12S hose assemblies.
99-26-14: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) applicable to Agusta S.p.A. Model AB412 helicopters. This action requires removing and replacing certain main rotor yokes with airworthy main rotor yokes before further flight. This amendment is prompted by the fatigue failure of a main rotor yoke (yoke). Fatigue analysis indicates that certain yokes are on the low end of the manufacturer s tolerance for thickness and do not have the desired margin of safety. This condition, if not corrected, could result in fatigue failure of the yoke, loss of a main rotor blade, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.
2000-08-51: 2000-08-51 TELEDYNE CONTINENTAL MOTORS: Docket No. 2000-NE-16-AD. Applicability: This Airworthiness Directive (AD) is applicable to Teledyne Continental Motors (TCM) IO-360, TSIO-360, LTSIO-360, O-470, IO-470, TSIO-470, IO-520, TSIO-520, LTSIO-520, IO-550, TSIO-550 and TSIOL-550 series engines that were assembled, rebuilt, or overhauled using a crankshaft that was manufactured between April 1, 1998, and March 31, 2000, listed by engine and crankshaft serial number (SN) in TCM Mandatory Service Bulletin (MSB) 00-5A, dated April 28, 2000. NOTE 1: The engines and crankshafts that are the subject of this AD were manufactured by TCM from April 1, 1998 through March 31, 2000. However the dates that the engines and crankshafts were delivered may not coincide with their dates of manufacture. For crankshafts identified in paragraph (a) of this AD, TCM has already determined which engines have a new suspect crankshaft installed and have identified those engines by engine SN. The crankshaft SN is only used to determine the need for taking a core sample for those crankshafts identified in paragraph (a) and (b) of this AD. NOTE 2: The engine SN can be found in logbooks or other maintenance records. For those engines that were overhauled in the field with factory new crankshafts, the crankshaft SN should be shown in work orders, log books or other maintenance records. If the engine was assembled new, rebuilt, or overhauled on or before March 31, 1998, or on or after April 1, 2000, no action is required. NOTE 3: This AD applies to each engine identified in the preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the requirements of this AD. For engines that have been modified, altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (d) ofthis AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to address it. Compliance: Compliance with the following instructions is required within the next 10 hours time-in-service from the receipt of this Emergency AD, unless already accomplished. To prevent crankshaft failure due to crankshaft connecting rod journal fracture, which could result in total engine power loss, in-flight engine failure and possible forced landing, do the following: NOTE 4: TCM supplies an instructional video in the tool kit for MSB 00-5A. It is recommended that the technician views and understands "Instructional Video for Compliance with Teledyne Continental Motors Mandatory Service Bulletin MSB 00-5A" before performing these procedures. Crankshaft Material Inspection (a) For thoseengines and crankshafts listed by SN in TCM MSB 00-5A, dated April 28, 2000, perform the crankshaft material inspection (crankshaft propeller flange core sample) as follows: NOTE 5: The engine SN's listed in TCM MSB 00-5A contain only the numerical portion of the SN. Engines that have been rebuilt by TCM will have a letter "R" at the end of the six digit numerical portion. Disregard the letter "R." (1) Perform the crankshaft material inspection (crankshaft propeller flange core sample) in accordance with sections A through J of TCM MSB 00-5A, dated April 28, 2000, as follows: (i) Use the specialized tools and equipment provided by TCM as listed in section A of TCM MSB 00-5A, dated April 28, 2000. (ii) You may use each rotobroach bit to obtain up to six core samples. Replace the rotobroach after the sixth core sample, or before if the rotobroach does not cut with the maximum torque applied. (iii) Maintain a record of each core sample obtained with eachrotobroach bit used. Contact TCM to obtain additional rotobroach bits. (iv) Do not exceed the torque limits specified in TCM MSB 00-5A, dated April 28, 2000, when obtaining the core sample. (2) After obtaining the core sample, disposition the crankshaft as follows: (i) If TCM notifies you that the crankshaft is not serviceable, replace the crankshaft with a serviceable crankshaft of the same part number prior to further flight. (ii) If TCM notifies you that the crankshaft is serviceable, the propeller assembly may be reinstalled. Installation of Crankshafts (b) After the effective date of this AD, installation of a crankshaft with a SN that is listed in MSB 00-5A, dated April 28, 2000, is prohibited, unless core samples have been taken and TCM approval for return to service has been received. (c) Crankshaft material inspections (crankshaft propeller flange core samples) performed in accordance with TCM MSB 00-5, dated April 14, 2000, comply with this AD and must not be repeated. Alternative Methods of Compliance (d) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used if approved by the Manager, Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office (ACO). Operators shall submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, Atlanta ACO. NOTE 6: Information concerning the existence of approved alternative methods of compliance with this airworthiness directive, if any, may be obtained from the Atlanta ACO. (e) Copies of the applicable service information may be obtained from Teledyne Continental Motors, PO Box 90, Mobile, AL 36601; telephone toll free 1-888-200-7565, or on the TCM internet site "www.tcmlink.com." This information may also be examined at the FAA, New England Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803. (f) Emergency AD 2000-08-51, issued April 28, 2000, becomes effective upon receipt.
99-23-03: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that is applicable to Bell Helicopter Textron Canada (BHTC) Model 430 helicopters. This action requires verifying the torque on each vertical fin attachment bolt (bolt); modifying the vertical fin and tailboom and replacing the attachment hardware; and re-verifying the torque on the bolts after inspecting the fittings. This amendment is prompted by a report of a loose vertical fin, which was discovered during a post-flight inspection. The actions specified in this AD are intended to prevent loss of torque of the bolts, which could lead to fracture of the bolts, separation of the vertical fin from the helicopter, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.
90-11-05: 90-11-05 AIRBUS INDUSTRIE: Amendment 39-6603. Docket No. 89-NM-223-AD. Applicability: Model A300 series airplanes, as listed in Airbus Industrie Service Bulletin A300-57-142, dated December 17, 1986, certificated in any category. Compliance: Required as indicated, unless previously accomplished. To prevent failure of the outer shroud box aft hinge brackets, accomplish the following: A. Prior to the accumulation of 5,000 landings, or within the next 300 landings after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later, perform a detailed visual inspection to detect cracks in the outer shroud box aft hinge brackets, in accordance with Airbus Industrie Service Bulletin A300-57-142, dated December 17, 1986. B. If no cracks are found, repeat the inspection required by paragraph A., above, at intervals not to exceed 1,000 landings. C. If cracks are found, prior to further flight, perform a detailed visual inspection to detect cracks or damage in the remaining supports (shroud box forward hinge brackets, inner shroud box forward attachments, and the attachment brackets at the inboard end of the inner box shroud box), in the inner and outer shroud box structure in the vicinity of the failed bracket, and the top skin of the inboard flap, in accordance with the Airbus Industrie Service Bulletin A300-57- 142, dated December 17, 1986. 1. If cracks or damage is found in the remaining supports, the inner and outer shroud box structure, or top skin of the inboard flap, repair prior to further flight in a manner approved by the Manager, Standardization Branch, ANM-113, FAA, Northwest Mountain Region. 2. If any bracket is found to be cracked, damaged, or otherwise failed, replace the bracket with a serviceable part prior to further flight. a. If the bracket is replaced with an improved steel bracket (Modification 6661H1033), in accordance with Airbus Industrie Service Bulletin A300-57-142, dated December 17, 1986, or AirbusIndustrie Service Bulletin A300-57-143, Revision 2, dated July 10, 1989, the repetitive inspection of that bracket, as required by paragraph A., above, may be terminated. b. If the bracket is replaced with other than an improved steel bracket, repeat the inspection required by paragraph A. above, prior to the accumulation of 5,000 landings on the new bracket, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 1,000 landings. D. An alternate means of compliance or adjustment of the compliance time, which provides an acceptable level of safety, may be used when approved by the Manager, Standardization Branch, ANM-113, FAA, Northwest Mountain Region. NOTE: The request should be forwarded through an FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector (PMI), who will either concur or comment and then send it to the Manager, Standardization Branch, ANM-113. E. Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with FAR 21.197 and 21.199 to operate airplanes to a base in order to comply with therequirements of this AD. All persons affected by this directive who have not already received the appropriate service documents from the manufacturer may obtain copies upon request to Airbus Industrie, Airbus Support Division, Avenue Didier Daurat, 31700 Blagnac, France. These documents may be examined at the FAA, Northwest Mountain Region, Transport Airplane Directorate, 17900 Pacific Highway South, Seattle, Washington, or the Standardization Branch, 9010 East Marginal Way South, Seattle, Washington. This amendment (39-6603, AD 90-11-05) becomes effective on June 19, 1990.
99-23-09: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Airbus Model A319, A320, and A321 series airplanes, that requires modification of the electro-distributor for the nose wheel steering servo-control. This amendment is prompted by issuance of mandatory continuing airworthiness information by a foreign civil airworthiness authority. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent uncommanded nose landing gear wheel rotation, due to defective seals in the wheel steering selector valve of the hydraulic control unit for the nose landing gear, which could result in reduced controllability of the airplane.
93-05-01: 93-05-01 BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON, INC. (BHTI): Amendment 39-8507. Docket Number 92-ASW-13. Applicability: BHTI Model 212 helicopters, certificated in any category. Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished previously. To prevent possible fatigue failure of the main rotor yoke assembly, accomplish the following: (a) For main rotor hub assemblies with main rotor yokes, part number (P/N) 204- 011-102 (all dash numbers), having 1,100 or more hours time in service since new or the last overhaul on the effective date of this AD, perform the following within the next 100 hours time in service, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 1,200 hours time in service: (1) Remove the main rotor yoke from the hub assembly. Visually inspect the pillow block bushing holes for corrosion and mechanical damage. Inspect the yoke for cracks using the magnetic particle method as specified in the BHTI component repair and overhaul manual. (2) If cracks are found, or if corrosion or mechanical damage is present that cannot be removed within the rework limits of the BHTI component repair and overhaul manual, replace the main rotor yoke with an airworthy part. (b) For main rotor hub assemblies with main rotor yokes, P/N 204-011-102 (all dash numbers), having less than 1,100 hours time in service since new or the last overhaul on the effective date of this AD, comply with paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this AD prior to attaining 1,200 hours time in service, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 1,200 hours time in service from the last inspection. (c) If no cracks are found and the yoke is airworthy, reinstall it in accordance with the BHTI component repair and overhaul manual. (d) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the compliance time, which provides an acceptable level of safety, may be used when approved by the Manager, Rotorcraft Certification Office, ASW-170, FAA, 4400 Blue Mound Road, Fort Worth, Texas 76106. Operators shall submit their requests through an FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may concur or comment and then send it to the Manager, Rotorcraft Certification Office. NOTE: Information concerning the existence of approved alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be obtained from the Manager, Rotorcraft Certification Office. (e) The visual and magnetic particle inspection specified in BHTI, Alert Service Bulletin 212-90-60, Part III, dated March 23, 1990, is an equivalent means of compliance with this AD. (f) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with FAR 21.197 and 21.199 to operate the helicopter to a location where the requirements of this AD can be accomplished. (g) This amendment becomes effective on April 19, 1993.
2013-21-05R1: We are revising Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2013-21-05 for Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH (now Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH) (Airbus Helicopters) Model EC135 P1, P2, P2+, T1, T2, and T2+ helicopters. AD 2013-21-05 required an initial and repetitive inspections of certain bearings and modifying the floor and a rod. Since we issued AD 2013-21-05, we have determined that modifying the floor and rod removes the unsafe condition. This AD retains the requirements of AD 2013-21-05 but removes the repetitive inspections. The actions of this AD are intended to prevent an unsafe condition on these products.
99-19-36: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Dornier Model 328-100 series airplanes, that requires a one-time inspection to measure the offset of the de-icing tubing adjacent to the refueling panel on the right-hand wing, and replacement with new improved tubing, if necessary. This amendment is prompted by issuance of mandatory continuing airworthiness information by a foreign civil airworthiness authority. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent a blockage in the de-icing tubing which could result in a malfunction of the de-icing boot. This malfunction would be unknown to the flight crew, and could lead to reduced controllability of the airplane during flight in icing conditions.
2006-03-03: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Rolls-Royce plc (RR) RB211 Trent 553-61, 553A2-61, 556-61, 556A2-61, 556B-61, 556B2-61, 560-61, and 560A2-61 turbofan engines. This AD requires initial and repetitive borescope inspections for missing HPT rear seal plate locking plugs and damaged locking plug retaining wires, and removal of the engine from service if necessary, based on inspection results. This AD results from two reports of missing HPT rear seal plate locking plugs, damage to the HPT disc, and damage to the remaining locking plug retaining wires. We are issuing this AD to prevent uncontained release of the HPT rear side plate and HPT disc, resulting in damage to the airplane.
86-15-10 R1: 86-15-10 R1 SOCIETE NATIONALE INDUSTRIELLE AEROSPATIALE (SNIAS): Amendment 39-5517 as revised by Amendment 39-6514. Docket No. 86-ASW-22. Applicability: Aerospatiale Model AS 350 and AS 355 series helicopters, certificated in any category. Compliance: Required as indicated, unless already accomplished. To prevent the failure of the main rotor head star arms and the main gearbox suspension bars, accomplish the following: (a) Within the next 10 hours' time in service after the effective date of this AD: (1) For Model AS 350 series helicopters, inspect the main rotor head components, the main gearbox suspension bars (struts), and the landing gear ground resonance prevention components (aft spring blades and hydraulic shock absorbers) in accordance with Service Bulletin (SB) 01.17a, paragraph CC.3. (2) For Model AS 355 series helicopters, inspect the main rotor head components, the main gearbox suspension bars (struts), and the landing gear ground resonance prevention components (aft spring blades and hydraulic shock absorbers) in accordance with SB 01.14a, paragraph CC.3. (b) Rework or replace damaged components in accordance with SB 01.17a or 01.14a (as applicable). (c) Repeat the inspections and rework of paragraphs (a) and (b) in intervals not to exceed 400 hours' time in service. (d) In the event the helicopter is subjected to a hard landing or to high surface winds, when parked without effective tiedown straps installed, repeat the inspections of paragraph (a) for the main rotor head star arms and the main gearbox suspension bars before further flight. (e) In the event of a landing which exhibits abnormal self-sustained dynamic vibrations (ground resonance type vibrations) repeat all the inspections of paragraph (a). (f) An alternate method of compliance with this AD, which provides an equivalent level of safety, may be used when approved by the Manager, Aircraft Certification Division, Federal Aviation Administration, Fort Worth, Texas 76193-0100, or by the Manager, Aircraft Certification Office, AEU-100, FAA, Europe, Africa, and Middle East Office, c/o American Embassy, Brussels, Belgium. (g) In accordance with Sections 21.197 and 21.199, flight is permitted to a base where the inspections required by this AD may be accomplished. The manufacturer's specifications and procedures shall be done in accordance with Aerospatiale SB 01.17a or 01.14a (as applicable). The incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(1). Copies may be obtained from Aerospatiale Helicopter Corporation, 2701 Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, Texas 75051, Attention: Customer Support. These documents may be examined in the Rules Docket at the Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, Federal Aviation Administration, Room 156, Building 3B, 4400 Blue Mound Road, Fort Worth, Texas 76106 or at the Office of the Federal Register, 1100 L Street, NW., Room 8401, Washington, D.C. This AD revises AD 86-15-10, Amendment 39-5517 (52 FR 13233; April 22, 1987), which became effective on April 22, 1987, as to all persons except those persons to whom it was made immediately effective by priority letter AD 86-15-10, issued July 30, 1986, which contained this amendment. This amendment (39-6514, AD 86-15-10 R1) becomes effective on March 22, 1990.
2018-23-09: We are superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2016-13-16, which applied to all The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -700, -700C, - 800, -900, and -900ER series airplanes. AD 2016-13-16 required an inspection or records check to determine if affected horizontal stabilizers are installed, related investigative actions, and, for affected horizontal stabilizers, repetitive inspections for any crack of the horizontal stabilizer rear spar upper chord, and corrective action if necessary. This AD requires retaining the requirements of AD 2016-13-16, with revised service information that clarifies the inspection areas and serial number information of the horizontal stabilizer. This AD was prompted by reports of a manufacturing oversight, in which a supplier omitted the required protective finish on certain bushings installed in the rear spar upper chord on horizontal stabilizers, which could lead to galvanic corrosion and consequent cracking of the rear spar upper chord. We are issuingthis AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
2018-23-03: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Airbus SAS Model A318 and A319 series airplanes; Model A320-211, -212, -214, -231, -232, and -233 airplanes; and Model A321-111, -112, -131, - 211, -212, -213, -231, and -232 airplanes. This AD was prompted by reports of false resolution advisories (RAs) from certain traffic collision avoidance systems (TCASs). This AD requires modification or replacement of certain TCAS processors. We are issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
93-18-04: 93-18-04 AEROSPATIALE: Amendment 39-8689. Docket 93-NM-47-AD. Applicability: Model ATR42-300 and ATR42-320 series airplanes, certificated in any category, and having the following serial numbers: 005 through 016, inclusive; 018 through 030, inclusive; 032 through 036, inclusive; 038; 040; 042; 043; 048 through 062, inclusive; 064 through 090, inclusive; 092 through 094, inclusive; and 096 through 228, inclusive. Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished previously. To prevent loss of strength of the fuselage frames, accomplish the following: (a) Prior to the accumulation of 18,000 total landings, or within 100 landings after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later, conduct a general visual inspection of fuselage frames 25 and 27 to verify the proper installation of a rivet in each of the key holes, in accordance with Aerospatiale Service Bulletin ATR42-53-0070, dated June 10, 1991; Revision 1, dated June 12,1992; or Revision 2, dated March 22, 1993. (b) If a rivet is installed in each of the key holes, no further action is required by this AD. (c) If a rivet is not installed in a key hole, prior to further flight, perform an eddy current inspection of the open key hole to detect cracks, in accordance with the service bulletin. (1) If no cracks are found as a result of the eddy current inspection, prior to further flight, install a rivet in the open key hole in accordance with the service bulletin. After such installation, no further action is required by this AD. (2) If cracks are found as a result of the eddy current inspection, prior to further flight, repair the cracks in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, Standardization Branch, ANM-113, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. (d) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used if approved by the Manager, Standardization Branch, ANM-113, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, Standardization Branch, ANM-113. NOTE: Information concerning the existence of approved alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be obtained from the Standardization Branch, ANM-113. (e) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with FAR 21.197 and 21.199 to operate the airplane to a location where the requirements of this AD can be accomplished. (f) The inspections and installation shall be done in accordance with the following Aerospatiale service bulletins, which contain the specified effective pages: Service Bulletin Referenced and Date Page Number Revision Level Shown on Page Date Shown on Page ATR42-53-0070 (Original) June 10, 1991 1-13 Original June 10, 1991 ATR42-53-0070 Revision 1 June 12, 1992 1-7,9-12 8 1 Original June 12, 1992 June 10, 1991 ATR42-53-0070 Revision 2 March 22, 1993 1-2, 9-10 3-7, 11-12 8 2 1 Original March 22, 1993 June 12, 1992 June 10, 1991 This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR Part 51. Copies may be obtained from Aerospatiale, 316 Route de Bayonne, 31060 Toulouse, Cedex 03, France. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC. (g) This amendment becomes effective on November 18, 1993.
96-03-07: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Beech Model 400, 400A, and MU-300-10 airplanes, that requires installation of an improved adjustment mechanism on the flightcrew seats and replacement of the existing aluminum seat reinforcement assemblies with steel assemblies. This amendment is prompted by reports of incomplete latching of the existing adjustment mechanism and cracked reinforcement assemblies, which could result in sudden shifting of a flightcrew seat. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent such shifting of a flightcrew seat, which could impair the flightcrew's ability to control the airplane.
99-22-06: This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to all CASA Model CN-235 series airplanes, that currently requires repetitive eddy current inspections to detect fatigue cracks in the nose landing gear (NLG) turning tube, and replacement of cracked tubes. This amendment adds a requirement for the replacement of the existing NLG turning tube constructed of aluminum alloy with a new NLG turning tube made of steel; such replacement terminates the repetitive inspections. This amendment is prompted by issuance of mandatory continuing airworthiness information by a foreign civil airworthiness authority. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent fatigue cracking and failure of the NLG turning tube, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the NLG.
2018-22-10: We are superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2016-04-16, which applied to all The Boeing Company Model DC-10-10, DC-10-10F, DC- 10-15, DC-10-30, DC-10-30F (KC-10A and KDC-10), DC-10-40, DC-10-40F, MD-10-10F, MD-10-30F, MD-11, and MD-11F airplanes. AD 2016-04-16 required adding design features to detect electrical faults and to detect a pump running in an empty fuel tank. This AD continues to require adding design features to detect electrical faults and to detect a pump running in an empty fuel tank. This AD also provides optional terminating action for certain requirements. This AD was prompted by a fuel system review conducted by the manufacturer. We are issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
94-14-12: 94-14-12 Teledyne Continental Motors: Priority Letter issued on June 23, 1994. Docket No. 94-ANE-33. Applicability: Teledyne Continental Motors (TCM) A-65-8, C-85-12, E-185-11, E-225-B, O-200, O-300-D, GO-300, IO-360-G, IO-360-K, TSIO-360, CRSIO-360-GB, O-470 B.M, O-470-L, O-470-R, O-470-U, O-470 Z.S, IO-470-C, IO-470-E, IO-470-F, IO-470-L, IO-470-N, IO-470-S, IO-470-V, IO-520-A, IO-520-B, IO-520-C, IO-520-D, IO-520-F, IO-520-K, IO-520-M, IO-520-W, TSIO-520, TSIO-520-C, TSIO-520-M, TSIO-520-N, TSIO-520-UB, GTSIO-520, IO-550-C, and R-670 reciprocating engines, installed on the following U.S. registered aircraft: N101G, N101JB, N101PQ, N1077B, N11PT, N111MK, N114R, N1162D, N1167J, N121LG, N124WN, N13159, N1344V, N1360L, N140NL, N1503S, N1556T, N1584V, N16165, N1672R, N1680R, N172CB, N1724T, N17793, N179SV, N1806F, N1818L, N182MC, N186Q, N19193, N19346, N207X, N200BD, N2051S, N2083S, N210KC, N21179, N2168N, N22FG, N2248Z, N2281T, N231KQ, N24FG, N2616N, N26560, N27G, N27326, N2841W, N2854W, N2881M, N2928B, N2995F, N3DX, N30C, N30CA, N300RS, N31CU, N313TM, N3145Y, N3153B, N323K, N3397Q, N340VV, N3499G, N35MX, N35840, N35964, N3599L, N3603L, N36319, N3700J, N39545, N4008F, N4088V, N41CU, N41032, N4105C, N4154Y, N421CW, N421EM, N421SM, N4218L, N4259B, N4302L, N4354K, N4354W, N444BJ, N4591S, N4598S, N4672B, N476KE, N4761K, N47964, N4812F, N4884J, N4895E, N5089V, N51EN, N5314T, N5357A, N5377J, N5453J, N550DF, N5517A, N555YT, N5591D, N57032, N5732X, N58BS, N5808F, N60DM, N60062, N6108F, N6158R, N6169N, N6193X, N62121, N6222F, N6278V, N6285H, N6341X, N6363K, N6421P, N65WW, N65031, N6527P, N6579M, N6664L, N6669X, N6670G, N66909, N6706G, N67249, N677PC, N6789R, N6800R, N6822R, N6837Q, N68937, N6915F, N6952M, N6992E, N704GY, N704NQ, N7125E, N714BD, N7208V, N721X, N724BE, N7248H, N7303Y, N7309Q, N732DD, N735DV, N739JG, N7405S, N758JF, N777E, N7981D, N800WB, N8103Z, N8107D, N81070, N8150Q, N8168U, N8170D, N8209M, N8241N, N8307D, N8308Z, N836BQ, N8426S, N8432Z, N8465L, N8491S, N85WB, N8501S, N8532R, N8579H, N8579M, N85797, N86VS, N8660M, N8669A, N8867T, N9099G, N9124U, N9157S, N91603, N91860, N922DK, N92465, N9410S, N9434N, N9435U, N9516Y, N9547U, N9597T, N9606Y, N96134, N9613Y, N9673L, N96761, N9764E, N9777R, N97799, N9833H, N984BC, and N9992G. Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished previously. To prevent detonation due to low octane, which can result in severe engine damage and subsequent failure, accomplish the following: (a) For engines that are certified to operate on only 91 or higher octane aviation gasoline (avgas) within the next 2 hours time in service (TIS) after the effective date of this airworthiness directive (AD) perform an engine teardown and analytical inspection, and replace with serviceable parts as necessary in accordance with TCM Service Bulletin (SB) No. M88-10, dated August 24, 1988. (b) For engines that are certified to operate on 80 octane avgas, within the next 2 hours TIS after the effectivedate of this AD conduct a differential compression test on all cylinders in accordance with TCM SB No. M84-15, dated December 21, 1984, and examine the oil filter by cutting the oil filter apart and spreading the filter paper out to look for metal particles. If metal particles are present, or if one or more cylinders shows unacceptable compression as specified in TCM SB No. M84-15, dated December 21, 1984, perform an engine teardown and analytical inspection, and replace with serviceable parts as necessary in accordance with TCM SB No. M88-10, dated August 24, 1988. (c) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used if approved by the Manager, Engine and Propeller Standards Staff. The request should be forwarded through an appropriate FAA Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, Engine and Propeller Standards Staff. NOTE: Information concerning the existence of approved alternative methods of compliance with this airworthiness directive, if any, may be obtained from the Engine and Propeller Standards Staff. (d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the aircraft to a location where the requirements of this AD can be accomplished. (e) Priority Letter AD 94-14-12, issued June 23, 1994, becomes effective upon receipt.
70-09-03: 70-09-03 SIKORSKY: Amdt. 39-980. Applies to S-61 Type Helicopters. To prevent failure of P/N S6135-66649 and S6137-66704 series tail gear box pitch beams accomplish the following: (a) Within the next 10 days or 25 hours in service, whichever occurs first after the effective date of this AD, unless already accomplished, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 90 days or 240 hours in service, whichever occurs first, from the last inspection perform the inspections of the bore area of the pitch beam in accordance with Sikorsky Service Bulletin No. 61B35-7 dated 12 February 1970 or later revisions or an equivalent method approved by the Chief, Engineering and Manufacturing Branch, FAA Eastern Region. If a crack is found, remove the pitch beam from service prior to further flight. This amendment is effective May 8, 1970.
81-13-01: 81-13-01 DEHAVILLAND: Amendment 39-4134. Applies to all DeHavilland DHC-2 series airplanes, certificated in all categories. Compliance required as indicated. Affects the elevator butt ribs (inboard), P/N C2TE-29ND (RH and LH), and doublers, P/N C2TE-9ND (RH and LH). a. Within the next 75 hours in service after the effective date of this AD, unless already accomplished within the last 325 hours in service, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 400 hours in service from the last inspection, inspect visually with a 10-power glass, the left and right elevator butt ribs and doublers for cracks. b. Replace or repair cracked parts, before further flight, in accordance with DeHavilland Service Bulletin (S/B) No. 2/30, or equivalent. c. Equivalent parts or repairs must be approved by the Chief, Engineering and Manufacturing Branch, FAA, Eastern Region. d. Upon submission of substantiating data by an owner or operator, through an FAA maintenance inspector,the Chief, Engineering and Manufacturing Branch, FAA, Eastern Region, may adjust the compliance times specified in this AD. This amendment becomes effective June 18, 1981.
2018-22-02: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all International Aero Engines (IAE) PW1133G-JM, PW1133GA-JM, PW1130G-JM, PW1127G-JM, PW1127GA-JM, PW1127G1-JM, PW1124G-JM, PW1124G1-JM, and PW1122G-JM turbofan engines with a certain high-pressure compressor (HPC) front hub installed. This AD was prompted by corrosion found on the HPC front hub. This AD requires replacing the HPC front hub with a part eligible for installation. We are issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
2005-26-13: The FAA is superseding an existing airworthiness directive (AD) for Turbomeca Artouste III series turboshaft engines. That AD currently requires smoke emission checks after every ground engine shutdown, and if necessary, additional checks and possibly removing the engine from service. That action also requires inspection of central labyrinths not previously inspected, or not replaced after the engine logged 1,500 operating hours, and, replacement if necessary. That action also requires the removal of injection wheels at a new lower life limit. This AD includes the same requirements as AD 2002-22-11, but reduces the compliance time for the initial inspection of the central labyrinth and adds repetitive inspections of the central labyrinth. This AD results from reports and analyses of in-flight engine shutdowns occurring since we issued AD 2002-22-11. We are issuing this AD to prevent injection wheel cracks and excessive central labyrinth wear, which could result in an in-flightengine shutdown and possible loss of the helicopter.