Results
2020-19-07: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for Leonardo S.p.a. Model AW169 helicopters. This AD requires modifying the weight on wheels (WoW) support installation on the main landing gear (MLG). This AD was prompted by a report that an inappropriately tightened WoW support could result in a rotation of the support and improper WoW switch performance. The actions of this AD are intended to address an unsafe condition on these products.
95-16-08: 95-16-08 AlliedSignal, Inc.: Amendment 39-9328. Docket 94-ANE-10. Applicability: AlliedSignal, Inc. (formerly Allied-Signal, Inc., Garrett Engine Division, Garrett Turbine Engine Company, and AiResearch Manufacturing Co. of Arizona), TPE331-25, -43, -1, -2, -3, -5, -6, -8, -10, -11, and -12 series, and -55B and -61A Model turboprop engines; and TSE331-3U Model turboshaft engines. These engines are installed on but not limited to Mitsubishi MU-2B series (MU-2 series); Construcciones Aeronauticas, S.A. (CASA) C-212 series; Jetstream 3101 and 3201 series; Fairchild SA226 and SA227 series; Prop-Jets, Inc. Model 400; Cessna Model 441; Twin Commander Aircraft Corp. 680, 690, and 695 series, and Model 681; Rockwell Commander or Ayres Corp. S-2R series; Short Brothers and Harland, Ltd. SC7; Dornier 228 Series; Beech Aircraft Corp. 18 and 45 series and Models JRB-6, 3N, 3NM, 3TM, and B100; Pilatus PC-6 series; DeHavilland DH 104 Dove series; Grumman Model TS-2A; Grumman American ModelG-164C; and Schweizer Aircraft Corp. Model G-164 series aircraft. NOTE: This AD applies to each engine identified in the preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the requirements of this AD. For engines that have been modified, altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/operator must use the authority provided in paragraph (c) to request approval from the FAA. This approval may address either no action, if the current configuration eliminates the unsafe condition, or different actions necessary to address the unsafe condition described in this AD. Such a request should include an assessment of the effect of the changed configuration on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD. In no case does the presence of any modification, alteration, or repair remove any engine from the applicability of this AD. Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished previously. To prevent uncontained failure of turbine rotors, fire, or loss of aircraft control, accomplish the following: (a) Within 400 cycles in service (CIS) after the effective date of this AD, review engine life limited part logs, engine repair and maintenance records, maintenance purchase receipts, and aircraft maintenance records (collectively referred to as "records") to identify any engine repair, assembly, or modification that was performed by, or any life limited turbine components received from Fliteline Maintenance, located in Wharton, Texas, domestic repair station certificate number GR2R856K; or Mr. Eugene E. Shanks, mechanic certificate number 1914482; or Mr. Carl Ramirez, mechanic certificate number 466432551 (collectively referred to as "Fliteline"). (b) Within 400 CIS after the effective date of this AD, for engines or components identified in accordance with paragraph (a) of this AD, accomplish the following: (1) If records or other pertinent information indicate that the engine was disassembled beyond aft turbine mainshaft nut removal from the tie bolt by Fliteline, verify life limited turbine components and take appropriate action by the following methods: (i) Remove, disassemble the engine, compare, and match each component's part number (P/N) and serial number (S/N) against that engine's issued life limited part logs. Engine hot section inspection or overhaul normally requires comparing and matching of turbine components with the life limited part logs. An engine hot section inspection or overhaul, subsequent to maintenance by Fliteline, and performed by the engine manufacturer, an FAA certified repair station, or an FAA certified mechanic, other than Fliteline, constitutes compliance with paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this AD. (ii) Validate all Fliteline life limited part log entries by utilizing the component's hourly and cyclic life immediately before the Fliteline entry, as determined byrecords of the engine manufacturer or FAA certified repair stations other than Fliteline. A life limited part log entry is defined as a removal or installation record. Photocopied life limited part logs may be used provided component history can be established. NOTE: Engine manufacturer record and service information referred to in the AD can be attained by calling AlliedSignal Engines Customer Information Center, telephone (800) 338-3378 or (602) 231-5287. (iii) If the P/N, S/N, hourly and cyclic lives or the life limited part log of each life limited turbine component do not match or can not be validated, remove the component from service prior to further flight and replace with a serviceable component. (2) Verify that any requirements of AD's signed off by Fliteline were actually accomplished by visual examination or reinspection of the affected components in accordance with the applicable AD. A complete engine overhaul or other maintenance necessary to accomplishapplicable AD requirements, subsequent to maintenance by Fliteline, and performed by the engine manufacturer, an FAA certified repair station, or an FAA certified mechanic, other than Fliteline, constitutes compliance with paragraph (b)(2) of this AD. (c) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used if approved by the Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office. The request should be forwarded through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office. NOTE: Information concerning the existence of approved alternative methods of compliance with this airworthiness directive, if any, may be obtained from the Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office. (d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the aircraft to a location where the requirements of this AD can be accomplished. (e) This amendment becomes effective on September 5, 1995.
2008-12-06: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as: Vortex inserts are used inside the heat exchanger of the carburettor heating system. Up to serial number (s/n) 0044 inclusive those inserts have been produced from aluminium alloy which has been found to be susceptible of cracks. As a consequence, if left uncorrected some loose parts could migrate in the induction system, reduce the air flow through the carburettor's venturi and lead to a loss of engine power. From s/n 0045 onwards vortex inserts have been produced from stainless steel. We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe condition on these products.
2001-19-04: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Boeing Model 767-200 and -300 series airplanes. This action requires repetitive inspections to find discrepancies of the barrel nuts that attach the vertical fin to body section 48, and follow-on actions. For certain airplanes, this action requires replacement of certain bolts with new bolts. This action also provides for optional terminating actions for the repetitive inspections. This action is necessary to find and fix corroded, cracked or broken barrel nuts that attach the vertical fin to body section 48, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the vertical fin attachment joint, loss of the vertical fin, and consequent loss of controllability of the airplane. This action is intended to address the identified unsafe condition.
2018-21-05: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Airbus SAS Model A319-131, A319-132, A319-133, A320-231, A320-232, A320-233, A321-131, A321-231, and A321-232 airplanes. This AD was prompted by reports of fan cowl door (FCD) losses during take-off. This AD requires modification and re-identification, or replacement, of certain FCDs, and installation of a placard in the flight deck. We are issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
2008-12-02: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as: A failure mode has been identified following the examination of parts from another aircraft type (Jetstream 4100 series) that can lead to the loss of a nose-wheel. The Jetstream (HP.137) Mk1, 200, 3100 and 3200 series use a similar method for retaining the wheel assemblies on the landing gear axle and can therefore experience the same type of failure, i.e. a combination of excessive wear and/or adverse tolerances on the axle inner cone, outer cone or wheel hub splined sleeve cones resulting in the loss of the critical gap between the inner flange face of the wheel outer cone and the axle end face. If this gap is lost, it results in the wheel having free playalong the length of the axle. This condition, if not corrected, can cause the wheel nut lock plate to break, leading to the wheel retention nut unscrewing and subsequent separation of the nose wheel from the landing gear axle. We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe condition on these products.
95-16-03: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Model DC-9 series airplanes and C-9 (military) airplanes, that requires inspection of the driver links of the thrust reverser door to determine whether the driver links are chamfered, an inspection to detect damage of the overcenter links, and follow-on corrective actions, if necessary; and replacement or rework of the driver links. This amendment is prompted by reports of a thrust reverser door that failed to operate properly due to improperly manufactured (missing chamfers on the) driver links. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent damage to the overcenter links due to missing chamfers on the driver links, which may result in uncommanded opening of the thrust reverser door, and subsequently, adversely affecting controllability of the airplane.
2008-12-09: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as: * * * * * The assessment and lightning tests showed that certain fuel tube self-bonded couplings do not provide sufficient lightning current capability. The assessment also showed that single failure of the integral bonding wire of the self-bonded couplings could affect electrical bonding between the tubes. Insufficient electrical bonding between fuel tubes or insufficient current capability of fuel tube couplings, if not corrected, could result in arcing and potential ignition source[s] inside the fuel tank during lightning strikes and consequent fuel tank explosion. * * * We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe condition on these products.
2005-05-12: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all BAE Systems (Operations) Limited (Jetstream) Model 4101 airplanes. This AD requires repetitive detailed inspections of the aft fuselage frames for any discrepancies, and any applicable corrective actions. This AD is prompted by reports of corrosion found on the aft fuselage frames due to the ingress of water or liquid. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct corrosion of the aft fuselage frames, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the fuselage.
2001-18-11: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that is applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas Model 717 series airplanes. This action requires a one-time inspection of the support seal tubes of the rudder trim and load-feel actuator assembly of the rudder trim control system, located in the aft accessory compartment, for proper clearance between the actuator support seal tube and spring capsule assembly, and applicable follow-on/corrective actions. This action is necessary to detect and correct the accumulation of moisture in the rudder trim and load-feel actuator of the rudder trim control system. Such moisture could freeze and cause stiff operation, binding, or jamming of the rudder trim control system and consequent jamming of the rudder; and adversely affect directional control of an airplane.