Results
75-20-02: 75-20-02 BOEING: Amendment 39-2369 as amended by Amendment 39-2501. Applies to Model 737 series airplanes, Line Nos. 1 through 299 inclusive, certificated in all categories. Compliance required as indicated unless already accomplished. \n\tTo prevent unwanted trailing edge flaps retraction and leading edge flap extension, accomplish the following: \n\tA.\tAirplane Line Nos. 1 through 269 with flap power unit assemblies not modified in accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin 737-27-1041, Revision 4, Part II, or later FAA approved revisions, within the next 750 landings, unless accomplished within the last 250 landings, and at times thereafter not to exceed 1,000 landings, inspect the flap power unit in accordance with paragraph C. \n\tB.\tAirplane Line Nos. 270 through 299, or those earlier aircraft with flap power unit assemblies modified per Boeing Service Bulletin 737-27-1041, Revision 4, Part II, or later FAA approved revisions, within the next 750 landings, unless inspected within the last 750 landings, inspect in accordance with paragraph D.\n \tC.\tInspect the worm teeth in the flap power unit for wear in accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin 737-27-1041, Revision 4, or later FAA approved revisions, or in a manner approved by the Chief, Engineering and Manufacturing Branch, FAA Northwest Region. Flap power unit assemblies with worm teeth worn beyond the limits prescribed in the service bulletin, must be modified prior to further flight in accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin 737-27-1041, Revision 4, Part II, or later FAA approved revisions, or in a manner approved by the Chief, Engineering and Manufacturing Branch, FAA Northwest Region. Repetitive inspections for modified units are to be made in accordance with paragraph E. \n\tD.\t1. Inspect the worm gear for wear in accordance with either inspection procedure in Boeing Service Bulletin 737-27-1076, Revision I, Part III, or later FAA approved revisions, or in a manner approved by the Chief, Engineering and Manufacturing Branch, FAA Northwest Region. Repetitive inspections are to be accomplished at intervals specified in either Method I or Method II of paragraph B, Part III, of the service bulletin, but not to exceed 5,000 landings for Method I or 3,000 landings for Method II. \n\t\t2.\tFlap power unit assemblies with worm gears worn beyond the limits specified in the service bulletin are to be replaced with new parts prior to further flight. \n\tE.\tFlap power units repaired in accordance with paragraph C or D2 must be inspected during 1400-1600 landings after new parts are installed, in accordance with paragraph D1 above, and thereafter comply with paragraph D. \n\tF.\tThe inspections required by this directive may be terminated when the mechanical trailing edge flap asymmetry system has been replaced with the electrical system in accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin No. 737-27-1079 and; \n\t\t1.\tA new worm gear has been installed in the trailing edge flap drive power unit in accordance withBoeing Service Bulletin No. 737-27-1076, or the existing worm gear has been inspected in accordance with Service Bulletin No. 737-27-1076 and no perceptible wear groove can be identified on the side of any tooth, or other modifications approved by the Chief, Engineering and Manufacturing Branch, FAA Northwest Region are made and, \n\t\t2.\ta new worm has been installed in the trailing edge flap power drive unit in accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin No. 737-27-1041 Revision 4, or the existing worm has been inspected in accordance with Service Bulletin No. 737-27-1041 Revision 4 and no perceptible wear groove can be identified in the side of any tooth, or other modifications approved by Chief, Engineering and Manufacturing Branch, FAA Northwest Region are made. \n\tG.\tUpon request by an operator, through an appropriate FAA maintenance inspector, subject to approval by the Chief, Engineering and Manufacturing Branch, FAA Northwest Region, the repetitive inspection period herein may be adjusted for that operator if the request contains adequate substantiating data to justify the increase. \n\tH.\tFor the purposes of complying with this AD, subject to acceptance by the assigned FAA maintenance inspector, the number of landings on the flap power unit worm gear may be determined by actual count or by dividing each airplane's hours time in service since the flap power drive unit was installed, by the operator's fleet average time from takeoff to landing for the airplane type. \n\tThe manufacturer's specifications and procedures identified and described in this directive are incorporated herein and made a part hereof pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(1).\n \tAll persons affected by this directive who have not already received these documents from the manufacturer may obtain copies upon request to Boeing Commercial Airplane Company, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124. The documents may also be examined at FAA Northwest Region, 9010 East Marginal Way South, Seattle, Washington.Amendment 39-2369 became effective October 27, 1975. \n\tThis Amendment 39-2501 becomes effective February 9, 1976.
2003-11-19: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Boeing Model 727-100 and 727-200 series airplanes, that requires, under certain conditions, replacement of the installed autopilot pitch control computer with a modified computer, testing of the modified system, and revision of the Airplane Flight Manual (AFM). The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent undesirable and potentially dangerous pitch oscillations during coupled instrument landing system (ILS) approaches. This AD is intended to address the identified unsafe condition.
2018-07-03: We are superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2018-02-05 for certain Piper Aircraft, Inc. Models PA-28-140, PA-28-150, PA-28-151, PA-28-160, PA-28-161, PA-28-180, PA-28-181, PA-28-236, PA-28-201T, PA- 28R-180, PA-28R-200, PA-28R-201, PA-28R-201T, PA-28RT-201, and PA-28RT- 201T airplanes. AD 2018-02- [[Page 14569]] 05 required inspecting the fuel tank selector cover to verify the left and right fuel tank selector placards are located at the proper positions and replacing those that are improperly located with new placards. This AD addresses the same unsafe condition and requires the same actions as AD 2018-02-05, but changes the inspection of the fuel tank selector cover to a preflight check and allows for various fuel selector clocking configurations. This AD was prompted by our determination to allow the owner/operator (pilot) holding at least a private pilot certificate to perform the preflight check. We are issuing this AD to allow the pilot to do a preflight check of the fuel selector placards.
2013-18-06: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for Bell Model 206A, 206B, 206L, 206L-1, 206L-3, 206L-4, 222, 222B, 222U, 230, 407, 427, and 430 helicopters. This AD requires inspecting each bearing to determine if it has been properly staked and replacing the bearing or assembly if it has not been properly staked. This AD was prompted by bearings not being properly staked and migrating out of their proper position, which may limit the functionality of the affected part. The actions of this AD are intended to prevent failure of a bearing and the assembly in which it is installed and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.
2003-11-18: This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive (AD), that is applicable to Pratt and Whitney (PW) model 4000 series turbofan engines. That AD currently requires interim actions to address engine takeoff power loss events until the high-pressure-compressor (HPC) case is redesigned and available for incorporation on the PW4000 engines. This amendment requires the same actions as that AD, adds on-wing Testing-21 to engines installed on Boeing 747 and MD-11 airplanes, and adds the requirement to install a new Ring Case Configuration (RCC) rear HPC on engines installed in the Boeing fleet as terminating action to the requirements of this AD. This amendment is prompted by the development of an RCC rear HPC for PW4000 series turbofan engines installed in the Boeing fleet. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent engine takeoff power losses due to HPC surge.
2013-18-03: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Inc. (BHT) Model 206A, 206B, and 206L helicopters. This AD requires replacing certain part-numbered engine auto-relight kit control boxes. This AD was prompted by a design review that revealed the control box chipset did not meet the required temperature range requirements, which could cause the control box to malfunction, disabling the engine auto-relight system. The actions of this AD are intended to prevent a disabled auto-relight system, failure of the engine to relight after a flame-out, increased pilot workload during a power loss emergency, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.
97-09-04: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Airbus Industrie Model A320, A321, A330, and A340 series airplanes, that requires repetitive testing of certain fire shutoff valves (FSOV) on the left and right engines, repetitive checks of certain parts on the FSOV motors, and replacement of discrepant valves with modified valves. This amendment also requires modification of FSOV seals and motors as terminating action for the repetitive testing and check requirements. This amendment is prompted by reports indicating that FSOV s are not closing completely during maintenance testing. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent the flow of hydraulic fluid to the engine in the event of fire which, if not corrected, would fuel the fire, and lead to the loss of fluid in associated hydraulic systems, causing those systems to fail.
98-03-03: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Airbus Model A330 and A340 series airplanes. This action requires a one-time inspection of the free-fall actuators of the landing gear for discrepancies, and replacement of discrepant actuators with new, improved actuators. This action also requires eventual replacement of certain free-fall actuators. This amendment is prompted by the issuance of mandatory continuing airworthiness information by a foreign civil airworthiness authority. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent electrical short circuits to the free-fall actuators of the landing gear, which could result in failure to extend the landing gear, and consequent damage to the airplane structure during landing.
98-24-22: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that is applicable to Agusta A109C helicopters. This action requires, within the next 5 hours time-in-service (TIS), replacing the tail rotor blade grip assemblies (grip assemblies) with modified airworthy grip assemblies. This amendment is prompted by cracks that were found on the grip assemblies during maintenance inspections. This condition, if not corrected, could result in separation of a tail rotor blade and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.
2021-11-24: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, -900, and -900ER series airplanes. This AD was prompted by significant changes made to the airworthiness limitations (AWLs) related to fuel tank ignition prevention and the nitrogen generation system (NGS). This AD requires revising the existing maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate the April 2019 or November 2020 revision of the airworthiness limitations document. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
97-15-02: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to all Aerospatiale Model ATR42 and ATR72 series airplanes, that requires replacement of the attachment clips on the wing-to-fuselage fairings and on the upper cowlings of the engine nacelle with new improved attachment clips, and adding cup washers on the wing-to-fuselage fairing panels on certain airplanes. This amendment also requires a one-time inspection of certain fairings and the upper cowlings of the engine nacelle to detect discrepancies of the attachment hardware and the fairing panel; and replacement of the panel with a serviceable panel, if necessary. This amendment is prompted by a report of deformed attachment clips found on the wing-to-fuselage fairings and on the upper cowlings of the engine nacelle, and by a report of severe inflight vibration due to a loose wing/body fairing panel. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent deformation of the attachment clips due to insufficient strength of the attachment clip material. Such deformation of the attachment clips could result in the fairings and cowlings detaching from the airplane during flight and subsequently causing damage to the empennage or posing a hazard to persons or property on the ground.
2018-06-10: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Honda Aircraft Company LLC Model HA-420 airplanes. This AD requires incorporating a temporary revision into the airplane flight manual and replacing faulty power brake valves upon condition. This AD was prompted by reports of unannunciated asymmetric braking during ground operations and landing deceleration. We are issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
2013-10-04: We are superseding an existing airworthiness directive (AD) for all Piper Aircraft, Inc. Models PA-31, PA-31-325, and PA-31-350 airplanes. That AD currently requires a detailed repetitive inspection of the exhaust system downstream of the turbochargers and repair or replacement of parts as necessary. This new AD requires visual repetitive inspections, expanding the inspection scope to include the entirety of each airplane exhaust system. This AD was prompted by reports of exhaust system failures upstream of aircraft turbochargers and between recurring detailed inspections. We are issuing this AD to correct the unsafe condition on these products.
2003-11-17: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that applies to certain Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. (Pilatus) Models PC-12 and PC- 12/45 airplanes. This AD requires you to inspect the front and rear surfaces of the pressure dome for damage and cracks, and, if necessary, accomplish repairs. This AD is the result of mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by the airworthiness authority for Switzerland. The actions specified by this AD are intended to detect and correct damage and cracks to the pressure dome, which could lead to rapid decompression.
2013-16-14: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH (ECD) EC 135 P1, P2, P2+, T1, T2, and T2+ helicopters equipped with a certain main transmission housing upper part. This AD requires installing a corrugated washer in the middle of the main transmission filter housing upper part and modifying the main transmission housing upper part. This AD was prompted by an inspection of housing upper parts that revealed the bypass inlet in the oil filter area was not manufactured in accordance with applicable design specifications. The actions of this AD are intended to prevent failure of the main transmission and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.
73-26-09: 73-26-09 CESSNA: Amendment 39-1763 as amended by Amendment 39-1983. Applies to Model 500 (Serial Numbers 500-0001 through 500-0183) airplanes, with 400 or more hours' time in service. Compliance: Required as indicated, unless already accomplished. To detect cracks in the left and right flight compartment side windows (P/Ns 5511265-3 and -4), within the next 25 hours' time in service after the effective date of this AD, (on all airplanes with 400 or more hours' time in service) and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 200 hours' time in service, except as provided in Paragraph B(2), accomplish the following in accordance with the inspection procedures set forth in Cessna Service Letter SL56-2, dated November 9, 1973, or FAA-approved revisions or any equivalent method approved by the Chief, Engineering and Manufacturing Branch, FAA, Central Region: A) Either by use of x-ray procedures outlined in Cessna Service Letter SL56-2, dated November 9, 1973, inspect the flight compartment side windows (P/Ns 5511265-3 and -4) at the attachment locations, or in the alternative, visually inspect the window attachment locations by first removing the window outside retainers in accordance with the manufacturer's service instructions. B) (1) Prior to further pressurized flight replace unairworthy windows if as a result of any inspection required by this AD any of the following conditions are found: (a) A crack is visible in the window pane which has progressed past the edge of the retainer. (b) Any three or more screw holes are interconnected by a crack. (c) A crack has progressed to three inches or longer. (d) The sum of individual crack lengths exceeds six inches. (2) If a crack is discovered in a window pane but does not exceed any of the conditions specified in Paragraph B(1), inspect the window panes each 100 hours' time in service thereafter per Paragraph A of the AD until the window panes are replaced. C) Upon accumulation of 400 hours' time in service inspect replacement window panes in accordance with the requirements of this AD. D) The inspections and 400 hour window replacement requirements of this AD may be discontinued upon installation of left and right flight compartment side windows (P/N 5511285-3 and -4) in accordance with Cessna Service Bulletin SB 56-4 dated July 24, 1974, or later approved revisions. Any equivalent method must be approved by the Chief, Engineering and Manufacturing Branch, FAA, Central Region. Amendment 39-1763 became effective December 26, 1973. This Amendment 39-1983 becomes effective October 9, 1974.
2013-17-01: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Eurocopter France (Eurocopter) Model AS350 and AS355 helicopters. This AD [[Page 54381]] requires inspecting the tail rotor control stop screws to determine if they are correctly aligned and adjusting the screws if they are misaligned. This AD is prompted by the discovery of a loose nut on the tail rotor control stop and a misaligned tail rotor control stop screw. The actions of this AD are intended to detect a loose nut or a misaligned stop screw, which, if not corrected, could limit yaw authority, and consequently, result in a loss of helicopter control.
2018-06-07: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain The Boeing Company Model 757-200, -200CB, and -300 series airplanes. This AD was prompted by a report of fatigue cracking found in a certain fuselage frame, which severed the inner chord and web. This AD requires inspecting the fuselage frame for existing repairs, repetitive inspections, and applicable repairs. We are issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
2003-11-15: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to all McDonnell Douglas Model MD-90-30 airplanes, that requires replacing the lanyards on the pressure relief door for the thrust reverser with new, improved lanyards, and doing associated modifications. This action is necessary to ensure that the lanyards on the pressure relief door have adequate strength. Lanyards of inadequate strength could allow the pressure relief door to detach from the thrust reverser in the event that an engine bleed air duct bursts, which could result in the detached door striking and damaging the horizontal stabilizer, and consequent reduced controllability of the airplane. This action is intended to address the identified unsafe condition.
90-09-07: 90-09-07 SCHWEIZER AIRCRAFT CORPORATION (HUGHES HELICOPTER INC): Amendment 39-6717. Final Rule of priority letter AD. Docket No. 90-ASW-29-AD. Applicability: Model 269C series helicopters, serial number (S/N) 0004 through 1456, certificated in any category. Compliance: Required prior to further flight after the effective date of this AD, unless already accomplished. To prevent possible loss of longitudinal cyclic control and subsequent loss of the helicopter, accomplish the following: (a) Inspect the lower longitudinal cyclic control rod assembly, part number (P/N) 269A9940-7, to verify the proper location of the rod spring attachment clamp, P/N AN735-9, and position of the spring attach angles as follows: (1) Gain access to the lower longitudinal cyclic control rod assembly. (2) Position the cyclic stick to the full forward position. Verify that the stud in the friction linkage is completely forward in the friction link slot. If not, see paragraph (b). (3) On the lower longitudinal cyclic control rod assembly, measure the distance between the aft face of the forward jam nut and the forward edge of the clamp, P/N AN735-9. The distance should be between 7.85 and 7.97 inches. If not, see paragraph (b). (4) Verify that the horizontal legs of the angles attached to the clamp, P/N AN735-9, are parallel to the control rod and aligned with each other. If not, see paragraph (b). If correct, prevent movement of the parts, and torque the clamp nut to 20-25 in-lb. (b) Adjust the clamp and the attached angles, if necessary, by disconnecting the springs and loosening the screw and nut holding the angles and clamp, P/N AN735-9, together. Set a distance of 7.85 to 7.97 inches between the aft face of the rod forward jam nut and the forward edge of the clamp, P/N AN735-9. Position the horizontal legs of the angles attached to the clamp, P/N AN735-9, parallel to the control rod, and align with each other. Prevent movementof the parts, and torque the nut to 20-25 in-lb. Determine that the clamp is secure. Reconnect the springs to the angles. (c) Install the new worm type hose clamp, P/N AN737TW22 or AN737TW24, on the control rod, forward of and touching the clamp, P/N AN735-9. Torque the screw to a range of 40-45 in-1b. Determine that the clamp is secure. (d) Aircraft may be ferried in accordance with the provisions of FAR Sections 21.197 and 21.199 to a base where the requirements of the AD can be accomplished, provided cyclic control displacement is not reduced. (e) Alternate inspections, modification, or other actions which provide an equivalent level of safety may be used when approved by the Manager, New York Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, 181 South Franklin Avenue, Room 202, Valley Stream, New York. NOTE: Schweizer Service Bulletin No. B237 pertains to the requirements of this AD. This amendment (39-6717, AD 90-09-07) becomes effective October 3, 1990, as to allpersons except those persons to whom it was made immediately effective by Priority Letter AD 90-09-07, issued on April 24, 1990, which contained this amendment.
2000-16-06: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) for Bell Helicopter Textron Canada (BHTC) Model 430 helicopters. This AD requires replacing arm clamp screws (screws) in the yaw, roll, pitch, and collective syncro resolvers, and installing a guard bracket on the yaw, roll, pitch, and collective syncro resolvers. This AD is prompted by an operator's report that a yaw control channel jammed during freedom-of-control checks following maintenance. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent a jammed flight control and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.
74-24-09: 74-24-09 AIRESEARCH MANUFACTURING COMPANY OF ARIZONA: Amendment 39-2022 as amended by Amendment 39-2390. Applies to Ai-Research Model GTCP30-54, -59, -70 and -92 Auxiliary Power Units (APU's), installed in, but not limited to Hawker Siddeley HS and DH-125, Beech Hawker BH-125, Lockheed Model 1329, AMD-BA Falcon 20, Jet Commander 1121, Fairchild F-27, Goodyear Blimp, NAMC YS-11, BAC Viscount, HFB Noratlas, and Douglas DC-7 (conversion) certificated in all categories. \n\n\tCompliance required as indicated to detect, correct and prevent turbine wheel hub separation, accomplish the following: \n\n\t(a)\tAPU serial numbers prior to 29046: \n\n\t\tWithin the next 25 hours of APU operating time in service after the effective date of Amendment 39-2022 (for Model GTCP30-92 APU's), or 25 hours of operating time in service after the effective date of the Amendment 39-2390 (for Models GTCP30-54, -59, and -70 APU's), unless previously accomplished, inspect the clearance between the turbine wheel and the stationary seal at a minimum of six (6) approximately equally spaced circumferential positions using a tool and procedures described in Paragraph 2.B and C. of AiResearch Service Bulletin GTCP30-49-3649, dated October 17, 1974, or later FAA-approved revisions. The clearance must be a minimum of 0.075 inch at each measured position. If clearance is less than minimum, the condition must be corrected before further operation. \n\n\t(b)\tAll serial number APU's: \n\n\t\tBefore exceeding 500 APU operating hours time in service, or, 50 hours of additional APU operating time in service after the effective date of Amendment 39-2022, whichever occurs later (for Model GTCP30-92 APU's only), or, before exceeding 500 APU operating hours time in service, or 50 hours of additional APU operating time in service from the effective date of Amendment 39-2390 (for Models GTCP30-54, -59, and -70 APU's), whichever occurs later, and at intervals not to exceed 500 hours of APU operating time in service thereafter, inspect the turbine wheel hub "saddle area" for presence of fatigue cracks. If cracks are detected, replace turbine wheel with a serviceable part before further operation. AiResearch Service Bulletin GTCP30-49-3649, dated October 17, 1974, or later FAA-approved revisions, describes an acceptable method of performing this inspection. \n\n\t(c)\tEquivalent procedures may be approved by the Chief, Aircraft Engineering Division, FAA Western Region, upon submission of adequate substantiation data. \n\n\tAmendment 39-2022 became effective November 29, 1974, for all persons except those to whom it was made effective by airmail letter dated November 8, 1974. \n\n\tThis amendment 39-2390 becomes effective November 19, 1975.
2013-17-09: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all Airbus Model A318, A319, A320, and A321 series airplanes. This AD was prompted by reports that certain trimmable horizontal stabilizer actuators (THSA) were found with corrosion that affected the ballscrew lower splines between the tie-bar and screw-jack. This AD requires repetitive inspections of the THSA; ballscrew integrity tests, if necessary; and replacement of affected THSAs. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct corrosion in the ballscrew lower splines, which, if the ballscrew ruptured, could lead to transmission of THSA torque loads from the ballscrew to the tie-bar, prompting THSA blowback, and possible loss of control of the airplane.
2013-16-26: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all Airbus Model A330-200 Freighter series airplanes; Model A330-200 and - 300 series airplanes, and Model A340-200 and -300 series airplanes. This AD was prompted by reports of cracked adjacent frame forks of a forward cargo door. This AD requires repetitive detailed inspections for cracks and sheared, loose, or missing rivets of the forward cargo door and, for certain airplanes, of the aft cargo door, and repair if necessary. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct cracked or ruptured cargo door frames, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the forward or aft cargo door.
2000-16-04: This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive (AD) for BHTC Model 430 helicopters. That AD currently requires inspecting all four main rotor adapter assemblies for evidence of flapping and lead-lag contact. That AD also requires installing a never-exceed-velocity (VNE) placard with markings on the airspeed indicator glass and instrument case and revising the rotorcraft flight manual (RFM) to reflect the airspeed revision. This amendment provides mandatory terminating action for requirements of that AD by replacing the fluidlastic damper blade sets with improved sets that incorporate a pressure indicator to detect loss of damper fluid. This amendment is prompted by the need for a positive means of detecting loss of damper fluid that could result in main rotor tip path plane separation. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent increased vibrations, damage to the main rotor system, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.