Results
48-17-03: 48-17-03\tSIKORSKY: Applies to Model S-51 Helicopters. \n\nCompliance required at each 800-hour inspection. \n\nIn order to preclude any malfunctioning of the main rotor gearbox due to the normal wear which may be expected to occur in the primary and secondary planet pinion shafts (Sikorsky P/N S-535524), these parts should be rotated 180 degrees or replaced by new parts after 800 hours of operation. If rotated, replacement by new parts should be made after an additional 800 hours. \n\n(Sikorsky Aircraft Service Information Circular No. 8 Revision "B" dated January 13, 1948, covers this same subject.) \n\n\n\nAD 48-17-03
2021-18-17: The FAA is superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2012-21- 08, which applied to certain The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -700, - 700C, -800, and -900 series airplanes. AD 2012-21-08 required inspecting for part numbers of the operational program software (OPS) of the flight control computers (FCCs) and installing and testing an updated version of the FCC OPS. This AD was prompted by reports that during autopilot coupled instrument landing system (ILS) approaches, the airplane did not capture or track the glideslope correctly. This AD retains the requirement to inspect for part numbers of the OPS of the FCCs, and adds a new requirement to update the version of the FCC OPS if necessary. This AD also expands the applicability to include The Boeing Company Model 737-900ER series airplanes. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
90-22-03: 90-22-03 MCDONNELL DOUGLAS: Amendment 39-6769. Docket No. 90-NM-90-AD. \n\n\tApplicability: Model DC-10-10, -15, -30 (except KC-10A), and -40 series airplanes, as listed in McDonnell Douglas DC-10 Service Bulletin A28-196, dated March 30, 1990, certificated in any category. \n\n\tCompliance: Required as indicated, unless previously accomplished. \n\n\tTo prevent valve fuel leakage into the wing outboard leading edge area and the possibility of localized in-flight or ground fire, accomplish the following: \n\n\tA.\tWithin 120 days after the effective date of this AD, and thereafter, at intervals not to exceed 12 months, inspect the manifold drain/outboard fill valves, Part Number AF18C-57, in accordance with the procedures described in McDonnell Douglas DC-10 Service Bulletin A28-196, dated March 30, 1990. If any valve has valve top displacement, prior to further flight, replace the valve with a new like or serviceable valve. Continue to perform the repetitive inspections required by this paragraph until the valves are replaced in accordance with the paragraph B. of this AD. \n\n\tB.\tWithin 24 months after the effective date of this AD, replace the manifold drain/outboard fill valves, Part Number AF18C-57, with new valves, Part Number AF18C-57A, in accordance with the procedures described in McDonnell Douglas DC-10 Service Bulletin A28-196, dated March 30, 1990. The replacement of Part Number AF18C-57 with Part Number AF18C-57A constitutes terminating action for this AD. \n\n\tC.\tAn alternate means of compliance or adjustment of the compliance time, which provides an acceptable level of safety, may be used when approved by the Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, Northwest Mountain Region. \n\n\tNOTE: The request should be forwarded through an FAA Principal Inspector (PI), who will either concur or comment and then send it to the Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office. \n\n\tD.\tSpecial flight permits may be issued in accordance withFAR 21.197 and 21.199 to operate airplanes to a base in order to comply with the requirements of this AD. \n\n\tAll persons affected by this directive who have not already received the appropriate service documents from the manufacturer may obtain copies upon request to McDonnell Douglas Corporation, 3855 Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90846, Attention: DC-10 Technical Publications, C1-HDR (54-60). These documents may be examined at the FAA, Northwest Mountain Region, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue S.W., Renton, Washington, or the Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3229 East Spring Street, Long Beach, California. \n\n\tThis amendment (39-6769, AD 90-22-03) becomes effective on November 19, 1990.
2009-14-11: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as: On several ARRIUS 2F engines, the clearance between the P3 air pipe P/N 0319719180 and the rear right bulkhead P/N 0319998240 has been found to be too small. Investigations have shown that both P3 air pipe and rear right bulkhead were compliant to the design. The Turbomeca Engineering Department concluded that the tolerance of assembly established during the design could result in some rubbing between parts. Rubs between the pipe and the bulkhead may lead to premature wearing and finally rupture of the P3 air pipe. The loss of P3 air pressure would then force the fuel control system to idle which could have a detrimental effect in critical phases of flight. We are issuing this AD to prevent an uncommanded power loss, which could result in an emergency autorotation landing or accident.
80-08-09 R1: 80-08-09 R1 MCDONNELL DOUGLAS: Amendment 39-3743 as amended by Amendment 39-4209. Applies to Model DC-9-10, -20, -30, -40, -50 series airplanes (including military C9A, C9B, and VC9C airplanes) certificated in all categories. \n\n\tCompliance required as indicated, unless already accomplished. To prevent possible loss of structural integrity of the horizontal stabilizer rear spar, accomplish the following: \n\n\t(a)\tOn the accumulation of 20,000, or more, hours' total time in service, but less than 30,000 hours' total time in service, within 1,200 hours' additional time in service from the effective date of this AD, inspect the left and right horizontal caps by visual and eddy current methods per paragraph 2 of McDonnell Douglas Alert Service Bulletin A55-31, Revision 1, dated March 18, 1980. \n\n\t(b)\tOn the accumulation of 30,000, or more, hours' total time in service, within 800 hours' additional time in service from the effective date of this AD, inspect the left and right horizontal stabilizer upper and lower rear spar caps by visual and eddy current methods per paragraph 2 of McDonnell Douglas Alert Service Bulletin A55-31, Revision 1, dated March 18, 1980. \n\n\t(c)\tIf minor cracks are found which are within the limits of Figure 1 of Service Bulletin A55-31, remove minor cracks by trimming out as shown in Figure 1 of paragraph 2 of McDonnell Douglas Alert Service Bulletin A55-31, Revision 1, dated March 18, 1980. \n\n\t(d)\tHorizontal stabilizer spars which have been subjected to crack trim-out per paragraph (c) of this AD, must be reinspected by visual and eddy current methods within 800 hours' additional time in service after accomplishment of paragraph (c), and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 800 hours' time in service until or prior to the accumulation of 3,200 hours' time in service since accomplishment of paragraph (c) of this AD, at which time the spar cap must be removed and replaced with a like serviceable part. \n\n\t(e)\tIf cracks are found which are beyond the trim-out limits of Figure 1 of Service Bulletin A55-31, remove and replace with like serviceable part, and reinspect by visual and eddy current methods per paragraph 2 of McDonnell Douglas Alert Service Bulletin A55-31, Revision 1, dated March 18, 1980, prior to the accumulation of 20,000 hours' additional time in service on the replacement part. \n\n\t(f)\tIf no cracks are found as a result of any of the inspections required by this AD, reinspect the left and right horizontal stabilizer upper and lower rear spar caps by visual and eddy current methods per paragraph 2 of McDonnell Douglas Alert Service Bulletin A55-31, Revision 1, dated March 18, 1980, at intervals not to exceed 6,400 hours' time in service since the last inspection. \n\n\t(g)\tSpecial flight permits may be issued in accordance with FAR 21.197 and 21.199 to operate airplanes to a base for the accomplishment of inspections required by this AD. \n\n\t(h)\tAlternative inspections, modifications or other actions which provide an equivalent level of safety may be used when approved by the Chief, Aircraft Engineering Division, FAA Western Region. \n\n\t(i)\tThe replacement of horizontal stabilizer upper and lower rear spar caps in accordance with Part 2 Accomplishment Instructions of McDonnell Douglas DC-9 Service Bulletin 55-31 dated February 27, 1981, or later revisions approved by the Chief, Los Angeles Area Aircraft Certification Office, Northwest Region, constitutes terminating action for the repetitive inspections required by paragraphs (a) through (f) of this AD. \n\n\tThe manufacturer's specifications and procedures identified and described in this directive are incorporated herein and made a part hereof pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(1). \n\n\tAll persons affected by this directive who have not already received these documents from the manufacturer may obtain copies upon request to McDonnell Douglas Corporation, 3855 Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90846, Attention: Director, Publications and Training, C1-750 (54-60). \n\n\tThese documents also may be examined at FAA Northwest Region, 9010 East Marginal Way South, Seattle, Washington 98108 or Los Angeles Area Aircraft Certification Office, 4344 Donald Douglas Drive, Long Beach, California 90808. \n\n\tAmendment 39-3743 became effective May 12, 1980. \n\n\tThis Amendment 39-4209 becomes effective September 15, 1981.
82-04-03: 82-04-03 MCDONNELL DOUGLAS: Amendment 39-4316. Applies to all McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series airplanes, certificated in all categories with rudder pedal arm P/N 3616012 installed with more than 13,500 hours time in service. (Note: Time in service on the rudder pedal arm may be used if the operator has records to substantiate it.) Compliance required as prescribed herein. To detect fatigue cracking and possible structural failure of the rudder pedal arms, P/N 3616012, accomplish the following, unless already accomplished: \n\n\tA.\tWithin the next 2,000 landings or six months after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first, perform ultrasonic and dye penetrant inspections on rudder pedal arm assemblies, P/N 3616012, as outlined in Service Sketch 3224 and Accomplishment Instructions of McDonnell Douglas DC-8 Service Bulletin 27-265 dated June 11, 1981, or later revisions approved by the Chief, Los Angeles Area Aircraft Certification Office, FAA Northwest Mountain Region. \n\n\tB.\tIf no cracks are found, replace the rudder pedal arms with new P/N 3953505 aluminum rudder pedal arm assemblies or retain the 3616012 parts and repeat ultrasonic and dye penetrant inspections at intervals not to exceed 4,000 landings or one year, whichever occurs first. Replacement with aluminum rudder pedal arm assemblies constitutes terminating action for this AD. \n\n\tC.\tIf cracks are found, prior to further flight replace the rudder pedal arms with: \n\n\t\t1.\tNew P/N 3953505 aluminum rudder pedal arm assemblies and thereby terminate the repetitive inspection requirements of this AD, or \n\n\t\t2.\tReplace with new P/N 3616012 magnesium rudder pedal arm assemblies and repeat inspections specified in paragraph B above. \n\n\tD.\tSpecial flight permits may be issued in accordance with FAR 21.197 and 21.199 to operate airplanes to a base in order to comply with the requirements of this AD. \n\n\tE.\tFor the purposes of complying with this AD, subject to the acceptance by the assigned FAA Maintenance Inspector, the number of landings may be determined by dividing each airplane's number of hours time in service by the operator's fleet average time from takeoff to landing. \n\n\tF.\tUpon the request of an operator, an FAA maintenance inspector, subject to prior approval by the Chief, Los Angeles Area Aircraft Certification Office, Northwest Mountain Region, may adjust the inspection times specified in this AD to permit compliance at an established inspection period of that operator if the request contains substantiating data to justify the change for that operator. \n\n\tG.\tAlternative means of compliance with this AD which provide an equivalent level of safety may be used when approved by the Chief, Los Angeles Area Aircraft Certification Office, FAA Northwest Mountain Region. \n\n\tThe manufacturer's specifications and procedures identified and described in this directive are incorporated herein and made a part hereof pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(1). \n\n\tAll persons affected by this proposal who have not already received these documents from the manufacturer may obtain copies upon request to the McDonnell Douglas Corporation, 3855 Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90846, Attention: Director, Publications and Training, C1-750 (54-60). These documents also may be examined at FAA Northwest Mountain Region, 9010 East Marginal Way South, Seattle, Washington 98108, or 4344 Donald Douglas Drive, Long Beach, California 90808. \n\n\tThis airworthiness directive becomes effective March 21, 1982.
48-34-01: 48-34-01 BEECH: Applies to All Models AT-11, C18S Airplanes Which Have Been Modified in Accordance With Beech Service Bulletin D18-48 Referred to in AD 47-33-5 and All D18C, D18S and D18C-T Airplanes Which Have Been Modified in Accordance With Beech Service Bulletin D18C-3 Referred to in AD 47-33-06. Inspection required at next periodic inspection. Inspect the NAS 144 bolts, (identified by the stamped bolt head), installed in the revised stabilizer attachment fittings to determine that the depth of the outer dimension of the bolt head conforms to the acceptable limit of 0.226 inch plus or minus 0.010 inch. Bolts that do not meet this specification are under strength and must be replaced. Inspect the fuselage to stabilizer attachment fitting, P/N 437-186096, to determine that this fitting has not cracked where the lower 1/4-inch rivet attaches the fitting to the fuselage. (Beech Service Bulletin No. D18-51 covers this same subject.)
2002-14-28: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that applies to certain de Havilland Inc. (de Havilland) Models DHC-2 Mk. I, DHC-2 Mk. II, and DHC-2 Mk. III airplanes. This AD establishes a life limit for the front fuselage struts and requires you to repetitively replace the front fuselage struts every 15 years or repetitively inspect the struts for corrosion or fatigue damage and replace when the damage exceeds a certain level. This AD is the result of mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by the airworthiness authority for Canada. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent structural failure of the front fuselage caused by corrosion or fatigue damage to the struts that develops over time, which could result in reduced or loss of control of the airplane.
95-02-09: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain British Aerospace Model ATP airplanes, that requires inspections to detect damage, overheating, and proper operation of the DC connections and cooling fans in certain transformer rectifier units (TRU), and repair or replacement, if necessary. This amendment is prompted by a report of the loss of all DC electrical power, except for the battery emergency bus, due to failure of the TRU's, which occurred during flight. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent such failures that could lead to loss of essential electrical power required to continue safe flight of the airplane.
47-32-14: 47-32-14 BELL: (Was Service Note 1 of AD-1H-1.) Applies Only to Model 47B Serial Numbers 5, 6, and 10. Inspection required at intervals not to exceed 100-hours. In order to prevent misalignment of the tail rotor drive quill and tail rotor drive shaft and powerplant installation, due to the shifting of the engine mount assembly, caused by the insufficient clamping of the engine mount to the rubber mounts, the following action should be taken: (1) Inspect AN 365-524 nuts on AN 5-20A bolts in the "clamp" ends of the 47-612- 111-1 engine mount assembly for bottoming of nuts. If this condition is found, proceed as outlined in steps (2), (3), and (4). (2) Remove bolts from "clamps" and install AN 960-516 washers as required under the head of each bolt. Replace bolts in "clamps" and install nuts loosely. (3) Check installation of engine mount assembly on rubber mounts 47-600-011-1. Front face of left mount "clamp" must be 5/32 inch aft of front face of metal case of rubber mount. (4) Torque nuts to 100-140 inch-pounds. (Bell Service Bulletin No. 47C10 also covers this same subject.)
93-14-02: 93-14-02 FOKKER: Amendment 39-8626. Docket 93-NM-93-AD. Applicability: Model F28 Mark 0100 series airplanes; serial numbers 11244 through 11463, inclusive; certificated in any category. Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished previously. To prevent erroneous lateral guidance from the automatic flight control and augmentation system (AFCAS) when a go-around is initiated below 100 feet, during a flight director (FD) or non-redundant autopilot approach, accomplish the following: (a) Within 14 days after the effective date of this AD, amend Section 2.08.01, AFCAS LIMITATIONS, subsection Instrument Landing System (ILS) APPROACH, of the FAA-approved Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) to include the following statements. This may be accomplished by inserting a copy of this AD in the AFM. (1) Change Minimum Decision Height: "Weather Limitations: CAT II - FMA: GS/LOC - Minimum Decision Height (DH): 150 feet - Runway Visual Range(RVR): 400 meters/1,200 feet NOTE 1: CAT III (LAND 2 and LAND 3) weather limitations remain unchanged." (2) Change Minimum Use Height with GS/LOC annunciated. "Minimum use height: - If the surface wind exceeds 40 knots: 150 feet - If not: - With GS/LOC annunciated: 150 feet - With LAND 2 or LAND 3 annunciated: 0 feet" (3) Add the following limitation under ILS APPROACH: "USE OF FLIGHT DIRECTOR DURING ILS APPROACH When GS/LOC is annunciated on FMA, both FD's may not be used below 150 feet and must be switched OFF passing 150 feet." (b) Installation of improved AFCAS software, version V13S, in the flight control computers (FCC) in accordance with Fokker Service Bulletin SBF100-22-037, dated May 31, 1993, constitutes terminating action for the requirements of paragraph (a) of this AD. After this installation has been accomplished, the AFM limitations required by paragraph (a) may be removed. (c) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used if approved by the Manager, Standardization Branch, ANM-113, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, Standardization Branch, ANM-113. NOTE: Information concerning the existence of approved alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be obtained from the Standardization Branch, ANM-113. (d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with FAR 21.197 and 21.199 to operate the airplane to a location where the requirements of this AD can be accomplished. (e) The installation shall be done in accordance with Fokker Service Bulletin SBF100-22-037, dated May 31, 1993. This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR Part 51. Copies may be obtained from Fokker Aircraft USA, Inc., 1199 North Fairfax Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC. (f) This amendment becomes effective on August 2, 1993.
2021-03-09: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all The Boeing Company Model 727 series airplanes. This AD was prompted by a determination that excessive sealant coating on internal wing Structural Significant Items (SSIs) may not reveal cracks during inspections required by AD 98-11-03 R1. This AD requires revising the existing maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate inspections that will give no less than the required damage tolerance rating (DTR) for certain SSIs of the wing. This AD also requires repetitive inspections for cracking of the affected SSIs and repair if necessary. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
2002-14-24: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Cessna Model 650 airplanes, that requires a one-time inspection of the side brace mechanism assemblies of the left and right main landing gears (MLG) to detect any incorrect part number, and corrective actions if necessary. This action is necessary to prevent inadvertent disengagement of the locking mechanism of the side brace mechanism assembly, which could lead to collapse of the respective MLG, and result in a gear-up landing and possible injury to passengers and crew. This action is intended to address the identified unsafe condition.
80-09-11: 80-09-11\tTELEDYNE CONTINENTAL MOTORS: Amendment 39-3763. Applies to Model GTSIO-520 series engines overhauled by AAR Western Skyways, Inc. \n\tTo prevent the possible separation of the starter torsional damper from the starter gear shaft and subsequent damage to critical components in the engine nacelle, accomplish the following: \n\ta.\tPrior to next flight: \n\t\t1.\tRemove engine cowling to the extent that the rear of the engine, where the starter and/or starter adapter are installed, can be seen. \n\t\t2.\tInspect the locking device at the outboard end of the starter gear shaft, which secures the torsional damper (see Figure I) for proper installation of all required parts. There must be a snap ring (TCM P/N 502171), a nut lock key (TCM P/N 632980), a compression spring (TCM P/N 628311) and a Marsden slotted hex nut (TCM P/N 632979) installed. \n\t\t3.\tIf all of the parts (in 2. above) are installed correctly, no further action is required. \n\tb.\tIf all the parts (in a.2. above) are not installed or are of the incorrect part, accomplish the following: \n\t\t1.\tPrior to the next flight and within every 25 hours engine operating time thereafter until all correct parts are installed, check the torque on the existing hexagon nut on the starter gear shaft to 180-220 foot pounds. For installations incorporating a compressor sheave for air conditioner drive, the hex nut must be checked for a torque of 195-235 foot pounds. \n\t\t2.\tWithin 100 hours engine operating time after the effective date of this AD, install all correct parts in accordance with TCM overhaul manual instructions. \n\tParts may be obtained from Teledyne Continental Motors, P.O. Box 90, Mobile, Alabama 36601, telephone (A/C 205) 438-3411, or AAR Western Skyways, Inc., Troutdale, Oregon, telephone (A/C 503) 665- 1181 or any other Teledyne Continental Motors distributor. \n\n\t\nc.\tAircraft may be flown in accordance with FAR 21.197 to a base where the repairs required by this AD can be accomplished. \n\tAn equivalentmethod of compliance may be approved by the Chief, Engineering and Manufacturing Branch, Federal Aviation Administration, Southern Region, P.O. Box 20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320. \n\tThis amendment is effective upon publication in the Federal Register as to all persons except those persons to whom it was made immediately effective by priority mail, issued April 3, 1980, which contained this amendment.
92-08-01: 92-08-01 BOEING: Amendment 39-8212. Docket No. 91-NM-228-AD.\n\n\tApplicability: Model 757 series airplanes, equipped with Pratt and Whitney PW2000 series engines; as listed in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-28A0028, dated October 3, 1991; certificated in any category.\n\n\tCompliance: Required within 270 days after the effective date of this AD, unless previously accomplished.\n\n\tTo ensure that in-flight engine restart capability is available, accomplish the following:\n\n\t(a)\tRemove and replace the left and right engine fuel shutoff valves in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-28A0028 dated October 3, 1991.\n\n\t(b)\tAn alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the compliance time, which provides an acceptable level of safety, may be used when approved by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. The request shall be forwarded through an FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may concur or comment and then send it to the Manager, Seattle ACO.\n\n\t(c)\tSpecial flight permits may be issued in accordance with FAR 21.197 and 21.199 to operate the airplane to a location where the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.\n\n\t(d)\tThe replacement shall be done in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-28A0028 dated October 3, 1991. This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR Part 51. Copies may be obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington, 98124. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 1100 L Street NW., Room 8401, Washington, DC.\n\n\t(e)\tThis amendment becomes effective on May 19, 1992.
89-22-13: 89-22-13 BOEING: Amendment 39-6362. Docket No. 89-NM-103-AD \n\tApplicability: Model 757 series airplanes equipped with Pratt and Whitney engines, listed in Boeing Service Bulletin 757-76-0006, dated March 16, 1989, certificated in any category. \n\n\tCompliance: Required within the next 12 months after the effective date of this AD, unless previously accomplished. \n\n\tTo prevent the elevator control cables binding on the engine throttle control cable fairleads, accomplish the following: \n\n\t\tA.\tRemove two engine throttle control cable fairleads in accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin 757-76-0006, dated March 16, 1989. \n\n\t\tB.\tAn alternate means of compliance or adjustment of the compliance time, which provides an acceptable level of safety, may be used when approved by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, Northwest Mountain Region. \n\n\tNOTE: The request should be forwarded through an FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector (PMI), who will either concur orcomment, and then send it to the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Office. \n\n\t\tC.\tSpecial flight permits may be issued in accordance with FAR 21.197 and 21.199 to operate airplanes to a base in order to comply with the requirements of this AD. \n\n\tAll persons affected by this directive who have not already received the appropriate service documents from the manufacturer may obtain copies upon request to Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124. These documents may be examined at the FAA, Northwest Mountain Region, Transport Airplane Directorate, 17900 Pacific Highway South, Seattle, Washington, or Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 9010 East Marginal Way South, Seattle, Washington. \n\n\tThis amendment (39-6362, AD 89-22-13) becomes effective on November 20, 1989.
2007-11-18R1: The FAA is revising an existing airworthiness directive (AD) for General Electric Company (GE) CF6-50C series turbofan engines. That AD currently requires reworking certain forward fan stator cases and installing a fan module secondary containment shield. This AD requires the same actions but eliminates a certain service bulletin from the compliance method. This AD results from a review that shows that only one of the service bulletins referenced in the original AD is applicable as a compliance method. We are issuing this AD revision to eliminate a certain service bulletin from the compliance method and to prevent uncontained fan blade failures, which can result in separation of airplane hydraulic lines, damage to critical airplane systems, and possible loss of airplane control.
46-39-05: 46-39-05 DOUGLAS: (Was Mandatory Note 6 of AD-762-7.) Applies Only to C-54B and Other C-54 Series Airplanes Having the C-54B Fuel System. \n\n\tTo be accomplished not later than December 1, 1946. \n\n\tThe main fuel line supporting brackets at wing Stations 357, 378, and 399 are subject to vibration failure and are to be replaced with redesigned brackets. In addition, the United Carr clips at wing Station 378 are to be replaced by Adel clips. \n\n\t(Douglas Service Bulletin No. DC-4-5 covers this same subject.)
91-21-07: 91-21-07 MCDONNELL DOUGLAS: Amendment 39-8054. Docket No. 91-NM-104-AD. Supersedes AD 90-26-53 and AD 91-01-51. \n\n\tApplicability: Model DC-9 and DC-9-80 series airplanes, Model MD-88 airplanes, and C-9 (Military) airplanes; equipped with Primary Longitudinal Trim Relays (up and down), Leech (P/N) 9207-8333, -8333-1, -8968, -10101, -10296, and -10166; certificated in any category. \n\n\tCompliance: Required as indicated, unless previously accomplished. \n\n\tTo eliminate overheating of primary longitudinal trim relays and the possibility of fire in the forward cargo compartment, accomplish the following: \n\n\t(a)\tFor Model DC-9 series airplanes (other than Model DC-9-80 series airplanes), and C-9 (military) airplanes: Within 17 days after February 27, 1991 (the effective date of Amendment 39-6894, AD 90-26-53; and Amendment 39-6894, AD 91-01-51), or prior to the accumulation of 8,000 flight hours on the subject relays, whichever occurs later, remove the relay cover and inspect theprimary longitudinal trim relays for evidence of contact degradation, arcing, carbon build-up, or other evidence of abnormal wear on the contacts; and perform a functional check of the system in accordance with McDonnell Douglas Alert Service Bulletin A27-316, dated December 22, 1990, or January 4, 1991. \n\n\t(b)\tFor Model DC-9-80 series airplanes and Model MD-88 airplanes: Within 30 days after February 27, 1991, or prior to the accumulation of 16,000 flight hours on the subject relays, whichever occurs later, remove the relay cover and inspect the primary longitudinal trim relays for evidence of contact degradation, arcing, carbon build-up, or other evidence of abnormal wear on the contacts; and perform a functional check of the system in accordance with McDonnell Douglas Alert Service Bulletin A27-316, dated December 22, 1990, or January 4, 1991. \n\n\t(c)\tIf damage is found during the inspections or functional tests required by paragraphs (a) and (b) of this AD, prior to further flight, remove and replace the relays in accordance with McDonnell Douglas Alert Service Bulletin A27-316, dated December 22, 1990, or January 4, 1991. \n\n\t(d)\tFor Model DC-9 series airplanes (other than Model DC-9-80 series airplanes) and C-9 (Military) airplanes: Within 90 days after the effective date of this AD or prior to the accumulation of 8,000 flight hours on the subject relays, whichever occurs later; and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 8,000 flight hours; remove and replace the primary longitudinal trim relays with new approved parts in accordance with McDonnell Douglas DC-9 Maintenance Manual, Chapter 27-40-4. This replacement constitutes terminating action for the inspection and functional test required by paragraph (a) of this AD. \n\n\t(e)\tFor Model DC-9-80 series airplanes and Model MD-88 airplanes: Within 90 days after the effective date of this AD, or prior to the accumulation of 16,000 flight hours on the subject relays, whichever occurs later; and thereafterat intervals not to exceed 16,000 flight hours; remove and replace the primary longitudinal trim relays with new approved parts in accordance with McDonnell Douglas MD-80 Maintenance Manual, Chapter 27-40-4. This replacement constitutes terminating action for the inspection and functional test required by paragraph (b) of this AD. \n\n\t(f)\tAn alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the compliance time, which provides an acceptable level of safety, may be used when approved by the Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. \n\n\tNOTE: The request should be forwarded through an FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may concur or comment and then send it to the Manager, Los Angeles ACO. \n\n\t(g)\tSpecial flight permits may be issued in accordance with far 21.197 and 21.199 to operate airplanes to a base in order to comply with the requirements of this AD. \n\n\t(h)\tThe inspection and replacement requirements shall be done inaccordance with McDonnell Douglas Alert Service Bulletin A27-316, dated December 22, 1990, or January 4, 1991. This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR Part 51. Copies may be obtained from McDonnell Douglas Corporation, 3855 Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90846. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Northwest Mountain Region, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue S.W., Renton, Washington; or at the Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3229 East Spring Street, Long Beach, California; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 1100 L Street N.W., Room 8401, Washington, D.C. \n\n\tAirworthiness Directive 91-21-07 supersedes AD 90-26-53, Amendment 39-6894; and AD 91-01-51, Amendment 39-6893. \n\n\tThis amendment (39-8054, AD 91-21-07) becomes effective on November 19, 1991.
2009-15-02: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as: In-service experience has shown that a fracture of the gerotor pump of the A320 RAT [ram air turbine] may occur. This may lead to the non-operation of the RAT in case of an in-flight deployment. The Non-Deployment or Non-Pressurization of the RAT, associated with a double engine failure or a total loss of normal electrical power generation constitutes an unsafe condition. * * * * * We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe condition on these products.
69-25-01: 69-25-01\tBOEING: Amdt. 39-882. Applies to Model 727, 727C and 727-200 series airplanes. \n\tCompliance required within the next 2500 hours time in service after the effective date of this AD, unless already accomplished. \n\tTo prevent malfunction of the generator control circuit caused by induced electrical interference, accomplish the following or an equivalent modification procedure and parts installation approved by the Chief, Aircraft Engineering Division, FAA Western Region. \n\tWithin 2500 hours time in service after the effective date of this AD, unless already accomplished, modify the generator control panels in accordance with Section II, Boeing Service Bulletin No. 24-47, dated March 3, 1969, or later FAA approved revisions. \n\tThis amendment becomes effective January 3, 1970.
2009-14-06: The FAA is superseding an existing airworthiness directive (AD), which applies to all Boeing Model 777 airplanes. That AD currently requires, for the drive mechanism of the horizontal stabilizer, repetitive detailed inspections for discrepancies, repetitive lubrication of the ballnut and ballscrew, repetitive measurements of the freeplay between the ballnut and the ballscrew, and corrective action if necessary. This new AD revises the compliance times of the existing AD. This AD results from a report of extensive corrosion of a ballscrew in the drive mechanism of the horizontal stabilizer on a Boeing Model 757 airplane, which is similar in design to the ballscrew on Model 777 airplanes. We are issuing this AD to prevent an undetected failure of the primary load path for the ballscrew in the drive mechanism of the horizontal stabilizer and subsequent wear and failure of the secondary load path, which could lead to loss of control of the horizontal stabilizer and consequent lossof control of the airplane.
98-26-21: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Boeing Model 727 series airplanes that have been converted from a passenger to a cargo-carrying ("freighter") configuration, that requires limiting the payload on the main cargo deck by revising the Limitations Sections of all Airplane Flight Manuals (AFM), AFM Supplements, and Airplane Weight and Balance Supplements for these airplanes. This amendment also provides for the submission of data and analyses that substantiate the strength of the main cargo deck, or modification of the main cargo deck, as optional terminating action for these payload restrictions. This amendment is prompted by the FAA's determination that under certain conditions unreinforced floor structure of the main cargo deck is not strong enough to enable the airplane to safely carry the maximum payload that is currently allowed in this area. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent failure of the floor structure, which could lead to loss of the airplane.
2002-14-05: This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas Model MD-11 airplanes, that currently requires repetitive general visual inspections of the power feeder cables, terminal strip, fuseholder, and fuses of the galley load control unit (GLCU) within the No. 3 bay electrical power center to detect damage; and corrective actions, if necessary. This amendment requires replacement of the electrical wiring of the galley in the electrical power center in bays 1, 2, and 3 with larger gage cable assemblies, which terminates the repetitive inspections. This amendment also expands the applicability of the existing AD to include two additional airplanes. This action is necessary to prevent damage to the wire assembly terminal lugs and overheating of the power feeder cables on the No. 3 and 4 GLCU, which could result in smoke and fire in the center accessory compartment. This action is intended to address the identified unsafe condition. \n\n\tThe incorporation by reference of certain other publications, as listed in the regulations, was approved previously by the Director of the Federal Register as of January 4, 2000 (64 FR 71001, December 20, 1999).
2008-06-20 R1: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above that would revise an existing AD. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as: Subsequent to accidents involving Fuel Tank System explosions in flight * * * and on ground, * * * Special Federal Aviation Regulation 88 (SFAR88) * * * required a safety review of the aircraft Fuel Tank System * * *. * * * * * Fuel Airworthiness Limitations are items arising from a systems safety analysis that have been shown to have failure mode(s) associated with an `unsafe condition' * * *. These are identified in Failure Conditions for which an unacceptable probability of ignition risk could exist if specific tasks and/or practices are not performed in accordance with the manufacturers' requirements. This ADrequires actions that are intended to address the unsafe condition described in the MCAI. DATES: This AD becomes effective December 8, 2009. On April 23, 2008 (73 FR 14661, March 19, 2008), the Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in the AD. We must receive comments on this AD by January 7, 2010.