Results
2011-27-03: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all Model 737 airplanes. This AD was prompted by a report of extensive corrosion of a ballscrew used in the drive mechanism of the horizontal stabilizer trim actuator (HSTA). This AD requires repetitive inspections, lubrications, and repetitive overhauls of the ball nut and ballscrew and attachment (Gimbal) fittings for the trim actuator of the horizontal stabilizer; various modification(s); and corrective actions if necessary; as applicable. We are issuing this AD to prevent an undetected failure of the primary load path for the ballscrew in the drive mechanism of the HSTA and subsequent wear and failure of the secondary load path, which could lead to loss of control of the horizontal stabilizer and consequent loss of control of the airplane.
66-27-02: 66-27-02 BOEING: Amdt. 39-303 Part 39 Federal Register November 9, 1966. Applies to Model 707-300, -300B, -300C, and -400 Series Airplanes.\n \n\tCompliance required as indicated.\n \n\tTo detect cracks of the elevator nose structure in the outboard balance bay, accomplish the following:\n \n\t(a)\tWithin the next 800 hours' time in service after the effective date of this AD, unless accomplished within the last 800 hours' time in service, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 1,600 hours' time in service from the last inspection until modified in accordance with (h), inspect elevators of Model 707-300 and -400 Series airplanes with 20,000 or more hours' time in service on the effective date of this AD, and elevators of Model 707-300B Series airplanes with 12,000 or more hours' time in service on the effective date of this AD in accordance with (f).\n \n\t(b)\tWithin the next 200 hours' time in service after the effective date of this AD, unless accomplished within the last 200 hours' time in service, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 400 hours' time in service from the last inspection until modified in accordance with (h), inspect elevators of Model 707-300C Series airplanes with 2,000 or more hours' time in service on the effective date of this AD in accordance with (f). \n\n\t(c)\tBefore the accumulation of 20,800 hours' time in service and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 1,600 hours' time in service from the last inspection until modified in accordance with (h), inspect elevators of Model 707-300 and -400 Series airplanes with less than 20,000 hours' time in service on the effective date of this AD in accordance with (f).\n \n\t(d)\tBefore the accumulation of 12,800 hours' time in service and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 1,600 hours' time in service from the last inspection until modified in accordance with (h), inspect elevators of Model 707-300B Series airplanes with less that 12,000 hours' time in service on the effective date of this ADin accordance with (f). \n\n\t(e)\tBefore the accumulation of 2,200 hours' time in service and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 400 hours' time in service from the last inspection until modified in accordance with (h), inspect elevators of Model 707-300C Series airplanes with less than 2,000 hours' time in service on the effective date of this AD in accordance with (f).\n \n\t(f)\tVisually inspect for cracks in the leading edge of the elevators in bays No. 4 and No. 5 in accordance with paragraph 3, Part I, Boeing Service Bulletin No. 2386 (R-1), or later FAA- approved revision, except that the initial inspection of Bay No. 4 need not be accomplished until the next repetitive inspection of Bay No. 5 is required, if Bay No. 5 has been inspected in accordance with this paragraph.\n \n\t(g)\tIf cracks are found during the inspections specified in (f), before further flight, repair or replace cracked parts in accordance with the FAA-approved Structural Repair Manual or repair the elevatorin accordance with paragraph 3, Part II, Boeing Service Bulletin No. 2386(R- 1), or later FAA-approved revision or an equivalent approved by the Chief, Aircraft Engineering Division, FAA Western Region. \n\n\t(h)\tAfter the elevators have been modified in accordance with paragraph 3, Part II, Boeing Service Bulletin No. 2386(R-1) or later FAA-approved revision or an equivalent approved by the Chief, Aircraft Engineering Division, FAA Western Region, the repetitive inspections required by this AD may be discontinued.\n \n\t(i)\tUpon request of the operator, an FAA maintenance inspector, subject to prior approval of the Chief, Aircraft Engineering Division, FAA Western Region, may adjust the repetitive inspection intervals specified in this AD to permit compliance of an established inspection period of the operator, if the request contains substantiating data to justify the increase for that operator.\n \n\tThis directive effective November 9, 1966.
2011-27-06: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Dassault Aviation Model FALCON 7X airplanes equipped with certain ram air turbine (RAT) transformer rectifier units (TRUs). This AD was prompted by a report of incorrect design of the TRU part of the RAT system. This AD requires replacing any affected RAT TRU with a modified RAT TRU. We are issuing this AD to prevent loose internal wiring in the RAT generator, which could result in degraded direct current power to essential airplane systems while the RAT is deployed, which could adversely affect continued safe flight and landing of the airplane.
2010-06-12R1: We are revising an existing airworthiness directive (AD) for Thielert Aircraft Engines GmbH models TAE 125-02-99 and TAE 125-01 reciprocating engines. That AD currently requires replacing the existing rail pressure control valve with an improved rail pressure control valve. This new AD requires the same actions but relaxes the initial compliance time from within 100 flight hours to within 600 flight hours for TAE 125-01 reciprocating engines. This AD was prompted by the determination that our AD was inadvertently more restrictive than European Aviation Safety Agency AD 2008-0128. We are issuing this AD to prevent engine in-flight shutdown, possibly resulting in reduced control of the aircraft.
69-05-01 R2: 69-05-01 R2 DE HAVILLAND: Amendment 39-728 as amended by Amendment 39-1175 is further amended by Amendment 39-3824. Applies to de Havilland DHC-6 airplanes certificated in all categories: (a) Prior to next flight unless accomplished within the last 50 hours time in service, and at intervals thereafter not to exceed 100 hours time in service from the last inspection, visually inspect the control column lower sub-assembly, P/N C3CF39-17 for cracks. Replace cracked parts before further flight with a part of the same part number or with an equivalent part approved by the Chief, Engineering and Manufacturing Branch, FAA, Eastern Region. (b) The repetitive inspection interval required by (a) may be increased by the Chief, Engineering and Manufacturing Branch, FAA, Eastern Region upon receipt of substantiating data submitted through an FAA maintenance inspector. (c) Report the results of the initial inspection findings required by this AD to the Chief, Engineering and Manufacturing Branch, FAA, Eastern Region (reporting approved by the Bureau of the Budget under B.O.B. No. 04-R0174). (d) Cracked parts, P/N C3CF39-17, may be replaced with a new sub-assembly, P/N C3CF39-19, in accordance with De Havilland Modification No. 6/1433 in De Havilland Service Bulletin (S/B) No. 6/180, Revision D, dated April 30, 1976, ACCOMPLISHMENT INSTRUCTION No. 5, or with an equivalent approved by the Chief, Engineering and Manufacturing Branch, FAA, Eastern Region. (e) The repetitive inspection required by (a) may be discontinued when the lower sub-assembly is replaced by P/N C3CF39-19 in accordance with De Havilland Modification No. 6/1433, or FAA approved equivalent. Amendment 39-728 effective March 5, 1969, and was effective upon receipt for all recipients of the telegram dated January 31, 1969 which contained this amendment. Amendment 39-1175 was effective March 23, 1971. This Amendment 39-3824 becomes effective July 7, 1980.
2011-26-09: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, -900, and -900ER series airplanes. This AD was prompted by reports of excessive in- service wear damage of the thumbnail fairing edge seal, and of the panel rub strip and skin assembly of the fan cowl. This AD requires replacement of the thumbnail fairing edge seals on both sides of the engines with Nitronic 60 stainless steel alloy seals. We are issuing this AD to prevent failure of the fire seal, which could allow a fire in the fan compartment to spread beyond the firewall and reach the flammable fluid leakage zones, resulting in an uncontrolled fire.
2011-26-06: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for Airbus Model A330-200 and -300 series airplanes, Model A340-200 and -300 series airplanes, and Model A340-500 and -600 series airplanes. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as: During a pre-flight test before delivery of an aeroplane from the Airbus production line, a fault message was triggered on FDU1 [fire detection unit]. Investigations by the supplier on the faulty FDU have identified a soldering quality issue on one of the internal cards. This quality issue resulted from a specific repair process that was applied to some FDU * * * during manufacturing. The FDU monitors the engine, Auxiliary Power Unit (APU) and Main Landing Gear (MLG) bay fire detection systems. This condition, if not corrected, may adversely affect the fire detection system performance in case of a fire in the area that is monitored by the faulty FDU, potentially resulting in an unsafe condition. * * * * * We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe condition on these products.
66-04-03: 66-04-03 SIKORSKY: Amdt. 39-194 Part 39 Federal Register February 12, 1966, as amended by Amendment 39-1563 is further amended by Amendment 39-2577. Applies to Models S-55 Series and S-62A Helicopters. Compliance required as indicated. To prevent operation with fatigue cracks in the spar of a main rotor blade, accomplish the following: (a) Except as provided in (e), remove from service S14-10-2100 series main rotor blades with 2,225 or more hours' time in service on the effective date of this AD within the next 25 hours' time in service. (b) Except as provided in (e), remove from service S14-10-2100 series main rotor blades with less than 2,225 hours' time in service on the effective date of this AD before the accumulation of 2,250 hours' time in service. (c) Except as provided in (e), remove from service S14-10-2201 series main rotor blades with 2,100 or more hours' time in service on the effective date of this AD within the next 150 hours' time in service. (d) Except as provided in (e), remove from service S14-10-2201 series main rotor blades with less than 2,100 hours' time in service on the effective date of this AD before the accumulation of 2,250 hours' time in service. (e) The service life limits specified in (a), (b), (c), and (d) may be extended to 6,000 hours' total time in service for S14-10-2201-9 main rotor blades and S14-10-2100 series and S14- 10-2201 series blades modified to S14-10-2201-9 blades, provided the blades are inspected at the times and in the manner set forth in Sikorsky Service Bulletin No. 55B10-7E dated March 26, 1976 or No. 62B10-6E dated March 26, 1976 or later FAA approved revisions, as applicable, and, if low pressure is indicated, the cause is determined and corrected before further flight in accordance with the applicable service bulletin. Amendment 39-194 became effective February 12, 1966. Amendment 39-1563 became effective November 30, 1972. This Amendment 39-2577 becomeseffective April 27, 1976.
2011-06-06 R1: We are revising an existing airworthiness directive (AD) that applies to all Eclipse Aerospace, Inc. Model EA500 airplanes equipped with Pratt & Whitney Canada, Corp. (P&WC) Model PW610F-A engines. The existing AD currently requires incorporating an operating limitation of a maximum operating altitude of 30,000 feet into Section 2, Limitations, of the airplane flight manual (AFM). Since we issued that AD, P&WC has developed a design change for the combustion chamber liner assembly. This new AD retains the requirements of the current AD, clarifies the engine applicability, and allows the option of incorporating the design change to terminate the current operating limitation and restore the original certificated maximum operating altitude of 41,000 feet. We are issuing this AD to correct the unsafe condition on these products.
2011-26-03: We are superseding an existing airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Model 777-200, -300, and -300ER series airplanes. That AD currently requires installing Teflon sleeving under the clamps of certain wire bundles routed along the fuel tank boundary structure, and cap sealing certain penetrating fasteners of the main and center fuel tanks. This AD expands the applicability in the existing AD. This AD was prompted by fuel system reviews conducted by the manufacturer, which determined that electrical arcing on the fuel tank boundary structure or inside the fuel tanks could result in a fire or explosion. We are issuing this AD to correct the unsafe condition on these products.