Results
78-10-04: 78-10-04 AIRESEARCH MANUFACTURING COMPANY OF ARIZONA: Amendment 39-3216. Applies to AiResearch Model TSCP700-4B and -5 Auxiliary Power Units (APU's) which have first stage compressor disks P/N's 969600-1 or -2 installed, of the serial numbers listed. Disk Serial No. 7-03501-2503 7-03501-2531 7-03501-2504 7-03501-2532 7-03501-2506 7-03501-2538 7-03501-2507 7-03501-2545 7-03501-2510 7-03501-2546 7-03501-2511 7-03501-2548 7-03501-2513 7-03501-2549 7-03501-2514 7-03501-2558 7-03501-2519 7-03501-2582 7-03501-2522 7-03501-2588 7-03501-2523 7-03501-2599 7-03501-2526 7-03501-2606 7-03501-2527 7-03501-2619 7-03501-2718 7-03501-2529 7-03501-2743 Compliance required before accumulating a total of more than 3000 cycles on the first stage compressor disks, or within the next 300 cycles after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later, unless already accomplished: To prevent a high energy release of first stage compressorblades and disk parts due to the possible fatigue failure of the disk, accomplish the following: (a) Remove the first stage disk from the compressor section of the APU and replace with like serviceable part. (b) For the purposes of this AD: (1) A cycle is defined as a start and acceleration to at least 95% high pressure spool (N2) rpm followed by a shutdown, during which low pressure spool (N1) rpm reaches, or exceeds, 97% rpm nominal. If, in any start, operating and shutdown sequence, the low pressure spool (N1) is prevented from exceeding 91% rpm nominal, only one half of a cycle must be recorded. (2) Operators who have not kept a record of operating starts on individual disks may assume two starts have occurred for each recorded APU operating hour of service, or any other cycle per hour ratio approved by the operators' assigned FAA maintenance inspector, provided the request contains substantiating data to justify the alternative ratio. (3) Operators whohave not kept a record of APU operating hours of service shall estimate hours of APU operation equating APU operation to airplane hours time in service using a ratio approved by the operator's assigned FAA maintenance inspector and justified by substantiating data. NOTE: AiResearch Service Bulletin TSCP700-49-5016 dated April 25, 1978 refers to the same subject. This amendment becomes effective May 30, 1978.
2018-17-07: We are superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2017-24-01, which applied to certain ATR--GIE Avions de Transport R[eacute]gional Model ATR42-500 airplanes and Model ATR72-212A airplanes. AD 2017-24-01 required an inspection for routing attachments of electrical harness bundles and for wire damage, and corrective actions if necessary. This new AD adds additional airplanes to the applicability. This AD was prompted by a determination that additional airplanes are affected by the unsafe condition. We are issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products. [[Page 40964]]
2001-13-23: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Boeing Model 737-700 and -800 series airplanes, that requires inspections of certain tension bolts at the attachment of the aft pressure bulkhead to the fuselage at body station 1016 to determine if the correct parts are installed, and corrective action, if necessary. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent fatigue cracking along the bulkhead-to-fuselage attachment, which could result in structural failure of the aft pressure bulkhead and consequent rapid decompression of the airplane. This action is intended to address the identified unsafe condition.
2018-16-01: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain B/E Aerospace Fischer GmbH Attendant Seats NG and Pilot Seats 120/335. This AD requires removing and replacing the energy absorber (EA) assemblies on affected pilot seats and the removing and replacing affected attendant seats. This AD was prompted by the discovery that rivets with insufficient strength were used during the manufacture of EA assemblies installed on certain seats. We are issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
2001-13-21: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Bombardier Model DHC-8-102, -103, and -301 series airplanes, that requires repair of the flight deck angle. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent the flight deck angle from interfering with the clevis of the roll control disconnect cable, which could lead to an uncommanded disconnection of the roll control, resulting in reduced controllability of the airplane. This action is intended to address the identified unsafe condition.
2018-17-05: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all Airbus SAS Model A350-941 and -1041 airplanes. This AD was prompted by reports that electro-hydrostatic actuators (EHAs), installed on the inboard ailerons, elevators, and rudder, had degraded insulation resistance in the direct drive solenoid valve (DDSOV), due to incorrect sealing application. This AD requires a check of the insulation resistance of the DDSOV of each affected EHA and applicable corrective actions. We are issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
94-18-08: This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to McDonnell Douglas Helicopter Company and Hughes Helicopters, Inc. Model 369, 369A (OH-6A), 369D, E, F, FF, H, HE, HS, and HM series helicopters, that requires daily preflight checks and 100 hours time-in-service (TIS) inspections for tail rotor blade abrasion strip (abrasion strip) debonding until abrasion strip rivets (rivets) are installed. This amendment also supersedes a Priority Letter AD that currently requires installation of rivets, corrects tail rotor blade part numbers listed in the previous AD, and retains the daily preflight checks of the previous AD until rivets are installed to secure the abrasion strip. This AD provides a terminating action for the abrasion strip debonding and also seeks to clear up any confusion among operators caused by having a published AD and a Priority Letter that are applicable to the same helicopter part. This AD replaces both of those documents. Thisamendment is prompted by an accident resulting from the separation of an abrasion strip from a tail rotor blade and subsequent tail rotor separation. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent loss of the abrasion strip, separation of the tail rotor, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.
2008-03-16: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Cirrus Design Corporation (CDC) Models SR20 and SR22 airplanes. This AD requires you to inspect the rudder, aileron, and rudder-aileron interconnect rigging; correct any out-of-rig condition; replace the attaching hardware for the rudder-aileron interconnect arm; and report any out-of-rig condition found. This AD results from a jamming of the aileron and rudder controls on a Model SR20 airplane, which resulted in loss of rudder and aileron flight controls. We are issuing this AD to prevent the possibility of jamming of the rudder-aileron interconnect system, which may result in loss of rudder and aileron flight controls.
2001-13-19: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to all Bombardier Model DHC-8-102, -103, -106, -201, -202, -301, -311, -314, and -315 series airplanes, that requires revising the Bombardier maintenance program to incorporate repetitive inspections to detect fatigue cracking in certain structures; and corrective actions, if necessary. This amendment is prompted by issuance of mandatory continuing airworthiness information issued by a foreign airworthiness authority. The actions specified by this AD are intended to ensure that fatigue cracking of certain principal structural elements is detected and corrected; such fatigue cracking could adversely affect the structural integrity of these airplanes.
2001-13-24: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Airbus Model A310 series airplanes and Model A300 B4-600, B4-600R, and F4-600R (collectively called A300-600) series airplanes, that requires revising the Airplane Flight Manual to prohibit the airplane from being moved during inertial reference unit alignment. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent a loss of positioning data and a display of incorrect attitude data to the flight crew, which could result in severe consequences to the airworthiness of the airplane if operated under flight conditions with no visual reference. This action is intended to address the identified unsafe condition.
81-19-08: 81-19-08 GENERAL ELECTRIC: Amendment 39-4219. Applies to all General Electric Model CF6-6 series turbofan engines installed in McDonnell Douglas DC10-10 aircraft containing low pressure turbine rotor stage 2 disks, P/Ns 9690M77P03, 9690M77P04, 9690M77P09, 9690M77P11, and 9690M77P13. Compliance required as indicated. To prevent possible low cycle fatigue failure of these disks, the life limits have been reduced below the figures currently approved. Remove from service low pressure turbine rotor stage 2 disks prior to reaching the revised life limits listed below or within the next 25 cycles in service after the effective date of this AD, whichever comes later. Disk Part Number Previous Life Limit/Cycles Revised Life Limit/Cycles 9690M77P03 27,000 11,500 9690M77P04 27,000 11,500 9690M77P09 27,000 11,500 9690M77P11 27,000 11,500 Serial Numbers MP0A0727 through MP0A2215 9690M77P11 27,000 9,300 All other serial numbered disks9690M77P13 27,000 10,000 NOTE: General Electric CF6-6 Service Bulletin 72-786 pertains to this subject. This amendment becomes effective on September 21, 1981.
2018-17-03: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain The Boeing Company Model 787-8 and 787-9 airplanes. This AD was prompted by reports of failures of the lip heater assemblies of the inlet ice protection system of the cabin air compressor (CAC) due to chafing. This AD requires changing the airplane electrical connectors and the routes of certain wire bundles, and installing new or modified left and right CAC inlet duct assemblies. We are issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
2008-03-10: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Cessna Aircraft Company (Cessna) Models 525, 525A, and 525B airplanes. This AD requires you to inspect the lower wing skin structure, forward wing spar, lower fuselage skin, fairings, and the external fairing frames for corrosion; repair any damage found; apply a corrosion inhibitive sealant to the fuselage fairings before reinstalling; and disable the cockpit mounted pilot relief tube. This AD results from leaking of the cockpit mounted pilot relief tube, which caused corrosion of the airplane structure. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct any damage from corrosion of the airplane structure. Corrosion of the airplane structure could cause structural degradation and lead to structural failure of the airplane with consequent loss of control.
2020-19-04: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for Leonardo S.p.a. (Leonardo) Model AB139 and AW139 helicopters. This AD requires removing certain main gearbox (MGB) input modules from service. This AD was prompted by the discovery that a batch of duplex bearings, which are installed on the MGB input modules, are defective. The actions of this AD are intended to address an unsafe condition on these products.
94-17-17: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Boeing Model 747 series airplanes, that requires inspections of the inboard and outboard strut chords, stiffeners, and web to detect cracks and loose fasteners; repair of the chords, stiffeners, or web, if necessary; and replacement of any loose fastener. This amendment is prompted by reports of fatigue cracks and loose fasteners found in the forward lower spar web of the inboard strut on Model 747 series airplanes equipped with Pratt & Whitney JT9D-3 and JT9D-7 series engines. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent separation of the strut from the wing of the airplane due to fatigue cracking.
2008-03-05: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Boeing Model 747-100, 747-100B, 747-100B SUD, 747-200B, 747-200C, 747- 200F, 747-300, 747-400, 747-400D, 747-400F, 747SR, and 747SP series airplanes; and Model 767-200 and -300 series airplanes; equipped with certain Goodrich evacuation systems. For certain airplanes, this AD requires replacing the evacuation system shear-pin restraints with new ones. For certain other airplanes, this AD requires an inspection for manufacturing lot numbers; and a general visual inspection of the shear-pin restraints for discrepancies, and corrective actions if necessary. This AD results from several reports of corroded shear-pin restraints that prevented Goodrich evacuation systems from deploying properly. We are issuing this AD to prevent failure of an evacuation system, which could impede an emergency evacuation and increase the chance of injury to passengers and flightcrew during the evacuation.
2001-13-22: This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas Model DC-10-10, -15, -30, -30F (KC-10A military), and -40 series airplanes; and Model MD-10-10F and MD-10-30F series airplanes, that currently requires, among other actions, performing repetitive ultrasonic inspections of the attaching bolts on the inboard and outboard support on the inboard and outboard flap assembly to detect failed bolts, or verifying the torque of the attaching bolts on the inboard support on the outboard flap; and follow-on actions. This amendment, among other actions, adds a requirement to verify the torque of the attaching bolts on the outboard support on the inboard and outboard flaps, and allows repetitive torque verifications. This amendment is prompted by a review that revealed inadvertent omission of a requirement. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent in-flight loss of inboard and outboard flap assemblies due to failure ofH-11 attaching bolts, which could result in reduced controllability of the airplane.
2001-13-15: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Boeing Model 757 series airplanes, that requires a one-time inspection to find wire chafing of the left and right engine fuel shutoff valve wire bundles at Power Plant Station 278 on each engine strut, and repair if necessary. This amendment also requires replacement of three wire support brackets with improved wire support brackets. This amendment is prompted by reports that such wire support brackets failed due to fatigue, which subsequently caused the fuel shutoff valve wire to chafe and to experience a short circuit. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent such conditions, which could result in either the possible ignition of fuel vapors in a flammable leakage zone or in the inability to stop the flow of fuel in the event of an engine fire.
94-16-04: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to Schweizer Aircraft Corporation and Hughes Helicopters, Inc. Model 269A, 269A-1, 269B, 269C, and TH55A series helicopters, that requires a one-time visual inspection to detect missing or damaged tail rotor pedal bulkhead gussets (gussets), loose or missing gusset rivets, and initial installation of missing gussets or replacement of damaged gussets and rivets, if necessary. This amendment is prompted by reports of missing or damaged tail rotor pedal bulkhead gussets and loose or missing gusset rivets. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent failure of the tail rotor pedal support structure that could result in loss of tail rotor control and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.
2008-03-09: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for CFM International, S.A. CFM56-7B series turbofan engines. This AD requires revising the Airworthiness Limitations Section (ALS) in the Engine Shop Manual (ESM) and the air carrier's approved continuous airworthiness maintenance program (CAMP) to add mandatory inspections of certain low pressure turbine rear frames (TRFs) to the ALS or CAMP. This AD results from a refined lifing analysis by the engine manufacturer that shows the need to identify an initial threshold for inspecting certain TRFs. We are issuing this AD to prevent failure of the TRF from low-cycle fatigue cracks. Failure of the TRF could result in engine separation from the airplane, which could lead to loss of control of the airplane.
2001-13-18: This document supersedes Airworthiness Directive (AD) 99-12-02, which currently requires flight and operating limitations on Raytheon Aircraft Corporation (Raytheon) Beech Models 45 (YT-34), A45 (T-34A, B-45), and D45 (T-34B) airplanes. AD 99-12-02 resulted from a report of an in-flight separation of the right wing on a Raytheon Beech Model A45 (T-34A) airplane. The AD was issued as an interim action until the development of FAA-approved inspection procedures. Raytheon has developed procedures to inspect the wing spar assemblies of the above-referenced airplanes. This AD requires repetitive inspections of the wing spar assembly for cracks with replacement of any wing spar assembly found cracked (unless the spar assembly has a crack indication in the filler strip where the direction of the crack is toward the outside edge of the filler strip). This AD also includes a reporting requirement of the results of the initial inspection and maintains the flight and operating restrictions required by AD 99-12-02 until accomplishment of the initial inspection. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent wing spar failure caused by fatigue cracks in the wing spar assemblies and ensure the operational safety of the above-referenced airplanes.
2020-06-16: The FAA is superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) AD 2017- 03-02 for certain Rolls-Royce, Deutschland Ltd. & Co. KG RB211 Trent 768-60, 772-60, and 772B-60 model turbofan engines. AD 2017-03-02 required initial and repetitive ultrasonic inspections (UIs) of the affected low-pressure (LP) compressor blades. This \n\n((Page 17739)) \n\nAD requires initial and repetitive UIs of the affected LP compressor blades and, depending on the results of the UIs, their replacement with a part eligible for installation. This AD was prompted by LP compressor blade partial airfoil release events. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
94-17-10: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to all de Havilland Model DHC-8 series airplanes, that requires removal of the aluminum or brass hardware in the firewall terminal block and battery shunt cable assemblies and replacement with steel hardware. This amendment is prompted by the results of an investigation, which revealed that corroded aluminum washers in the DC firewall terminal block and battery shunt cable assemblies may loosen the electrical connections. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent interruption of DC electrical power due to connections that may have loosened from corrosion.
2008-03-06: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by the aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as: A leakage in the area of a plastic T-connector was found during a daily pre-flight check. The investigation has shown a crack in the centre part of this connector. This AD requires actions that are intended to address the unsafe condition described in the MCAI.
2001-13-16: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Model A310 and Model A300 B4-600, A300 B4-600R, and A300 F4-600R (collectively called A300-600) series airplanes, that requires replacement of the ejection jack on the ram air turbine (RAT). The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent the ejection jack on the RAT from failing when the RAT is deployed at high airspeeds, leading to a loss of ability to properly restrain the movement of the RAT, possibly resulting in damage to the RAT itself and to other airplane components. In the event of an emergency, failure of the ejection jack on the RAT could also result in a reduction of hydraulic pressure or electrical power on the airplane. This action is intended to address the identified unsafe condition.