Results
2012-20-03: We are superseding an existing airworthiness directive (AD) for certain The Boeing Company Model 747 airplanes. That AD currently requires repetitive visual inspections around the bushings of the wing landing gear (WLG) beam outboard end fittings for corrosion, and rework if necessary; and ultrasonic inspections for cracks of the outboard end fittings of the WLG support beams, and rework if necessary. This new AD adds airplanes and adds repetitive inspections of the outboard end fitting of the left and right WLG support beams for cracks and corrosion, and corrective actions if necessary. This AD was prompted by new reports of corrosion damage to the end fittings of the WLG support beams, and one report of subsequent cracking in the end fittings. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct corrosion and subsequent cracking in the outboard end fittings, which could result in separation of the fitting and damage to adjacent flight control cables and hydraulic systems and consequent reduced controllability of the airplane.
96-09-14: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that applies to all Dornier 228 series airplanes. This action requires revising the Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) to provide the flight crew with recognition cues for, and procedures for exiting from, severe icing conditions, and to limit or prohibit the use of various flight control devices. This amendment is prompted by results of a review of the requirements for certification of the airplane in icing conditions, new information on the icing environment, and icing data provided currently to the flight crews. The actions specified by this AD are intended to minimize the potential hazards associated with operating the airplane in freezing rain or freezing drizzle conditions by providing more clearly defined procedures and limitations associated with such conditions.
2012-20-01: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain The Boeing Company Model 737-100, -200, and -200C series airplanes. This AD was prompted by a report of a severed upper butt strap, and cracks in the forward skin and bonded doubler, on one airplane. This AD requires repetitive inspections for cracks and a chemical spot test in the area of station (STA) 908, and related investigative and corrective actions, if necessary. For certain airplanes, this AD requires an inspection and modification. We are issuing this AD to prevent cracks at the adjacent mating skins (forward and aft), which could initiate just above stringers S-4R and S-4L; and could grow and result in a decompression event.
58-19-02: 58-19-02 HAMILTON STANDARD: Applies to All Hamilton Standard 2J17 Hollow Steel Propeller Blades Installed on Boeing 377 Aircraft. Compliance required as indicated. Operators that are using or have used these blades learned through adverse experiences that exceptional maintenance procedures and repair techniques are required to assure the continued airworthiness of these blades. In order to preclude the possibility of additional adverse experiences occurring either under the supervision of the present operators or other operators who will acquire some of the involved aircraft, the following shall apply: 1. Not later than August 1, 1959, remove from service all 2J17 Series propeller blades. 2. Prior to August 1, 1959, no operator who has not had previous experience in the overhaul and maintenance of 2J17 Series propeller blades shall be issued a certificate of airworthiness for aircraft on which these blades are installed.
99-17-09: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that is applicable to Allison Engine Company, Inc AE 2100A and AE 2100C series turboprop engines. This action requires initial and repetitive visual inspections of the propeller gearbox (PGB) and power section (P/S) strut fittings for notches and cracks, and, if necessary, replacement with serviceable parts. In addition, this action requires removing and replacing strut fittings as well as reworking them to the latest configuration identified by a new part number (P/N). This amendment is prompted by reports of P/S strut fitting notches and cracks. The actions specified in this AD are intended to prevent PGB and P/S strut fitting cracks, which could result in PGB misalignment, in-flight engine shutdown, and possible loss of the propeller.
2012-19-11: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain The Boeing Company Model 737 airplanes. This AD was prompted by a report of a flightcrew not receiving an aural warning during a lack of cabin pressurization event. This AD requires incorporating design changes to improve the reliability of the cabin altitude warning system by installing a redundant cabin altitude pressure switch, replacing the aural warning module (AWM) with a new or reworked AWM, and changing certain wire bundles or connecting certain previously capped and stowed wires as \n\n((Page 60297)) \n\nnecessary. For certain airplanes, this AD also requires prior or concurrent incorporation of related design changes by modifying the instrument panels, installing light assemblies, modifying the wire bundles, and installing a new circuit breaker, as necessary. We are issuing this AD to prevent the loss of cabin altitude warning, which could delay flightcrew recognition of a lack of cabin pressurization, and could result in incapacitation of the flightcrew due to hypoxia (a lack of oxygen in the body), and consequent loss of control of the airplane.
68-17-05: 68-17-05 ROLLS-ROYCE: Amdt. 39-636 as amended by Amendment 39-1318 is further amended by Amendment 39-1474. Applies to Spey Engines Models 506-14, 510-14, 511-8, and 511-14. Compliance required as indicated, unless already accomplished. To prevent or contain a possible failure of the H.P. center section air duct and thereby prevent possible secondary powerplant damage, accomplish the following: (a) Within the next 300 hours time in service after the effective date of this AD, visually inspect (with the aid of a mirror as necessary) the high pressure air system center section duct, P/Ns EU.29670A and EU.63415A, particularly adjacent to welds, for cracks (discoloration of the cowling and engine adjacent to the duct may be indicative of a duct crack), and incorporate a stainless steel wire braid wrap around the high pressure air system center section duct, P/Ns EU.29670A and EU.63415A, in accordance with Rolls-Royce Service Bulletin No. SP. 75-86, dated November 20, 1967, or later ARB-approved or an equivalent approved by the Chief, Aircraft Certification Staff, FAA, Europe, Africa and Middle East Region. (b) At the next scheduled aircraft inspection when the engine is uncowled after compliance with paragraph (a), and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 1,000 hours' time in service from the last inspection, inspect (with the aid of a mirror as necessary) the exposed high pressure air system center section duct for signs of cracking and the stainless steel wire braid wrap for security, distortion, and discoloration. NOTE: Distortion or discoloration of the wire wrap may be indicative of a duct crack. (c) If defects are found during the inspections required by paragraphs (a) and (b), before further flight, replace, as required, the center section duct with a serviceable P/N EU.29670A or P/N EU.63415A duct and a new stainless steel wire braid wrap. (d) Upon the request of an operator, an FAA maintenance inspector, subject to priorapproval of the Chief, Aircraft Certification Staff, FAA, Europe, Africa and Middle East Region, may adjust the repetitive inspection interval specified in this AD to permit compliance at an established inspection period of the operator, if the request contains substantiating data to justify the increase for such operator. Amendment 39-636 became effective September 14, 1968. Amendment 39-1318 became effective October 12, 1971. This Amendment 39-1474 becomes effective 28 June 1972.
2012-19-09: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for Eurocopter France (Eurocopter) Model EC 155B, EC155B1, SA-365N1, AS- 365N2 and AS 365 N3 helicopters to require visually inspecting the tail rotor hub (TRH) for a crack and removing the TRH if a crack exists. This AD is prompted by reports of cracks on two TRHs. These actions are intended to prevent the tail rotor from jamming, which could lead to reduced or loss of control of the helicopter.
72-03-01: 72-03-01 SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT: Amdt. 39-1382. Applies to S-61 Type Helicopters Certificated in all Categories. To prevent failures of flight control system components accomplish the following: (a) Within the next 30 days after the effective date of this AD, unless already accomplished, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 30 days from the last inspection, perform inspections of 7075-T6 and 7079-T6 aluminum alloy forgings of the flight control systems in accordance with Section 2 Accomplishment Instructions, Part IA (1) of Sikorsky Service Bulletin No. 61B40-5A or later FAA-approved revisions, or an alternate method approved by the Chief, Engineering and Manufacturing Branch, FAA Eastern Region. If a crack is found, remove the component from service prior to further flight. (b) Within the next 75 days after the effective date of this AD, unless already accomplished, perform an inspection of control system components P/N S6140-62118, S6140-62115 and S6140-20004 in accordance with Section 2, Accomplishment Instructions, Part IIB of Sikorsky Service Bulletin No. 61B40-5A or later FAA-approved revisions or an alternate method approved by the Chief, Engineering and Manufacturing Branch, FAA Eastern Region. If a crack is found, remove the component from service prior to further flight. This amendment is effective February 1, 1972.
2012-19-08: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for General Electric Company GEnx-1B54, GEnx-1B58, GEnx-1B64, GEnx-1B67, GEnx-1B70, GEnx-1B54/P1, GEnx-1B58/P1, GEnx-1B64/P1, GEnx-1B67/P1, GEnx-1B70/P1, GEnx-1B70/72/P1, GEnx-1B70/75/P1, GEnx-1B74/75/P1, GEnx-1B75/P1, GEnx- 2B67, and GEnx-2B67B turbofan engines. This AD requires initial and repetitive ultrasonic inspections (UI) of certain part number (P/N) fan mid shafts (FMS) for cracks. This AD was prompted by a report of an FMS failure and a report of a crack found in another FMS. We are issuing this AD to prevent failure of the FMS resulting in one or more engine failure(s) and possible loss of the airplane.
2012-04-07: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Airbus Model A330-200 series airplanes; Model A330-300 series airplanes; Model A340-200 series airplanes; and Model A340-300 series airplanes. This AD was prompted by a report that three failures of the retraction bracket occurred during fatigue testing before the calculated life limit of the main landing gear (MLG). This AD requires repetitive replacement of the affected retraction bracket of the MLG. We are issuing this AD to prevent failure of the retraction bracket, which could result in a MLG extension with no damping, and consequent structural damage of the MLG.
2012-18-11: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700, 701, & 702), CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705), and CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) airplanes. This AD was prompted by reports of failures of a hydraulic accumulator's screw-cap/end cap while on the ground that resulted in loss of use of that hydraulic system, and in high-energy impact damage to adjacent systems and structures. This AD requires an inspection for part numbers; repetitive inspections for any cracking of certain hydraulic system accumulators, and replacement, if necessary; and revising the maintenance program to include a life limit for certain hydraulic system accumulators. We are issuing this AD to prevent loss of use of a hydraulic system, which could result in reduced controllability of the airplane.
2012-19-01: We are superseding an existing airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Lycoming Engines (L)O-360, (L)IO-360, AEIO-360, O-540, IO- 540, AEIO-540, (L)TIO-540, IO-580, and IO-720 series reciprocating engines. That AD currently requires replacing certain crankshafts in the affected engines. This AD continues to require replacing certain crankshafts, corrects the start date of affected engine models in Lycoming Mandatory Service Bulletin (MSB) No. 569A to the start date in Supplement No. 1 to Lycoming MSB No. 569A, dated May 27, 2009, and [[Page 58004]] includes additional (formerly experimental) IO-390, AEIO-390, and AEIO- 580 series engine models having affected crankshafts. This AD was prompted by Lycoming Engines discovering that the start date of affected engine models in MSB No. 569A is incorrect and the need to include additional engine models having the affected crankshafts. We are issuing this AD to prevent failure of the crankshaft, which will result in total engine power loss, in-flight engine failure, and possible loss of the aircraft.
70-15-02: 70-15-02 CESSNA: Amdt. 39-1036. Applies to Models 336 (Serial Numbers 336-0001 through 336-0195), 337, 337A, B, C and D (Serial Numbers 337-0001 through 337-1193), T337B, C and D (Serial Numbers 337-0526 through 337-1193) Airplanes. Compliance: Required as indicated, unless already accomplished. To prevent damage to fuel quantity indicators and the fuel tank transmitters due to overheating which can result in smoke emission in the cockpit and inaccurate fuel quantity indication, accomplish the following: Within 50 hours' time in service after the effective date of this AD, install a cooling duct directing ram air over the fuel quantity indicators and perform a functional ground check of the fuel quantity system in accordance with the instructions contained in Cessna Service Letter No. ME70-24, dated July 7, 1970, or later FAA approved revision, or any other method approved by the Chief, Engineering & Manufacturing Branch, FAA, Central Region. This amendment becomes effective July 21, 1970.
2021-18-11: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Leonardo S.p.a. Model AB139 and AW139 helicopters. This AD was prompted by a report that, during a post-flight inspection of an in- service helicopter, a tail rotor slider assembly was found fractured, and the bushing and the actuator rod in the tail rotor servo were partially damaged. This AD requires an inspection of the rail rotor tail rotor slider assembly for corrosion and signs of circumferential refinishing and, depending on the findings, replacement of the tail rotor slider assembly with a serviceable part or repetitive inspections of the tail rotor slider assembly for corrosion and signs of circumferential refinishing, as specified in a European Aviation Safety Agency (now European Union Aviation Safety Agency) (EASA) AD, which is incorporated by reference. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
75-09-07: 75-09-07 GRUMMAN AMERICAN: Amendment 39-2180. Applies to all Model AA-1, AA-1A, and AA-1B airplanes certificated in all categories. Compliance: Required as indicated, unless previously accomplished. The aircraft may be flown to a facility where the inspection and/or replacement can be performed after expiration of the 50 hours time in service after the effective date of this AD. To prevent mixture control wire failures accomplish the following within the next 50 hours time in service after the effective date of this AD, and thereafter as indicated, in accordance with Grumman American Service Bulletin No. 144A or later FAA approved revision or an equivalent method approved by the Chief, Engineering and Manufacturing Branch, Great Lakes Region. A. Replace mixture control wires having 500 or more hours time in service in accordance with the referenced service bulletin. B. Repeat A at intervals not to exceed 500 hours in service. C. Inspect the mixture control in accordance with the referenced service bulletin and replace the mixture control wire if kinked or misrigged. D. Repeat C at intervals not to exceed 100 hours time in service. The manufacturer's specifications and procedures identified and described in this directive are incorporated herein and made a part hereof pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(1). All persons affected by this directive who have not already received these documents from the manufacturer may obtain copies upon request to Grumman American Aviation Corporation, 318 Bishop Road, Cleveland, Ohio 44143. These documents may also be examined at Great Lakes Regional Office, 2300 East Devon Avenue, Des Plaines, Illinois 60018 and at FAA Headquarters, 800 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington D.C. A historical file on this AD which includes the incorporated material in full is maintained by the FAA at its headquarters in Washington D.C., and at Great Lakes Region. This amendment becomes effective April 25, 1975.
2003-09-03: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that is applicable to certain EMBRAER Model EMB-135 and -145 series airplanes. This action requires repetitive inspections of the spring cartridges of the elevator gust lock system to determine if the lock washer projection correctly fits the slots in the cartridge flange, and corrective action if necessary. This action also provides for optional terminating action for certain airplanes. This action is necessary to prevent the elevator from jamming due to the spring cartridges unscrewing in the gust lock system, which could result in reduced controllability of the airplane. This action is intended to address the identified unsafe condition.
2012-18-18: We are superseding an existing airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Turbomeca S.A. Arriel 2B and 2B1 turboshaft engines. That AD currently requires accomplishment of the TU166 modification. This new AD requires adding the Arriel 2S2 and 2C2 engines to the applicability of engines requiring the TU166 modification with different compliance times. This AD was prompted by reports of an accident involving a twin-engine helicopter powered by two Arriel 2S2 engines. We are issuing this AD to prevent rupture of a gas generator (GG) turbine blade, which could result in an uncommanded in-flight shutdown and a forced landing or accident.
99-08-02 R1: 99-08-02 R1 BOEING: Amendment 39-11215. Docket 99-NM-112-AD. Revises AD 99-08-02, Amendment 39-11106.\n\n\tApplicability: Model 747 series airplanes having line numbers 1 through 1124 inclusive, certificated in any category.\n\n\tNOTE 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (d)(1) of this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to address it.\n\n\tCompliance: Required asindicated, unless accomplished previously.\n\n\tTo prevent ignition sources and consequent fire/explosion in the center fuel tank, accomplish the following:\n\nFuel Tank Inspection and Bonding Test\n\n\t(a)\tFor those airplanes listed in Boeing Service Bulletin 747-28-2205, Revision 1, dated April 16, 1998: Within 24 months after the effective date of this AD, accomplish paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this AD, in accordance with the service bulletin.\n\n\t\t(1)\tPerform a one-time visual inspection of the center fuel tank wiring and components to detect discrepancies (damage, disbonding, and incorrect installation). For the purposes of this AD, a visual inspection is considered to be a general visual inspection, which is defined as: "A visual examination of an interior or exterior area, installation or assembly to detect obvious damage, failure or irregularity. This level of inspection is made under normally available lighting conditions such as daylight, hangar lighting, flashlight, ordrop-light and may require removal or opening of access panels or doors. Stands, ladders, or platforms, may be required to gain proximity to the area being checked." If any discrepancy is detected, prior to further flight, repair the discrepant component, or replace it with a new or serviceable component. And\n\n\t\t(2)\tPerform a one-time electrical bonding test of the center fuel tank components. If any measured resistance exceeds the limits specified by the service bulletin, prior to further flight, rework the discrepant component.\n\n\tNOTE 2: Actions performed in accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin 747-28-2205, dated June 27, 1997, accomplished prior to the effective date of this AD, are considered acceptable for compliance only with the corresponding applicable actions specified in this AD. This excludes certain actions that are not described in that bulletin, such as inspection and testing of the body fuel tank components that are described in Revision 1 of Boeing ServiceBulletin 747-28-2205. Regardless of which version of the service bulletin is used to detect any discrepancies, the repair and replacement requirements of this AD apply.\n\n\tNOTE 3: Airplanes required to accomplish paragraph (b) of this AD are exempt from accomplishing steps 1 through 9 in Figure 11 of Boeing Service Bulletin 747-28-2205, Revision 1, dated April 16, 1998.\n\nFQIS Testing and Probe Replacement\n\n\t(b)\tFor those airplanes listed in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-28A2208, dated May 14, 1998: Within 24 months after the effective date of this AD, perform a one-time insulation resistance test of the fuel quantity indication system (FQIS), a one-time visual inspection of the FQIS wiring and components to detect discrepancies (chafing damage to the wiring and incorrect configuration of the terminal blocks), replacement of FQIS probes (tank units and compensators) with new or serviceable components in accordance with Figure 5 of the alert service bulletin, and system adjustment and system operational test; in accordance with the alert service bulletin. For the purposes of this AD, a visual inspection is considered to be a general visual inspection, which is defined as: "A visual examination of an interior or exterior area, installation or assembly to detect obvious damage, failure or irregularity. This level of inspection is made under normally available lighting conditions such as daylight, hangar lighting, flashlight, or drop-light and may require removal or opening of access panels or doors. Stands, ladders, or platforms, may be required to gain proximity to the area being checked." If any discrepancy is detected, prior to further flight, perform corrective actions in accordance with the alert service bulletin.\n\n\tNOTE 4: For airplanes on which steps 1 through 9 in Figure 11 of Boeing Service Bulletin 747-28-2205, dated June 27, 1997, or Revision 1, dated April 16, 1998, were accomplished prior to the effective date of this AD, steps 1 through 6 in Figure 16 of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-28A2208, dated May 14, 1998, are not required.\n\nFlame Arrestor Installation\n\n\t(c)\tFor airplanes having line numbers 1 through 971 inclusive: Within 24 months after the effective date of this AD, install a flame arrestor in the inlet line of the electrical motor-operated scavenge pump of the center fuel tank, in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-28A2210, dated May 14, 1998.\n\nAlternative Methods of Compliance\n\n\t(d)\t(1)\tAn alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used if approved by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, Seattle ACO.\n\n\t\t(2)\tAlternative methods of compliance, approved previously in accordance with AD 99-08-02, amendment 39-11106, are approved as alternative methods of compliance with paragraph (a) of this AD.\n\n\tNOTE 5: Information concerning the existence of approved alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be obtained from the Seattle ACO.\n\nSpecial Flight Permits\n\n\t(e)\tSpecial flight permits may be issued in accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.\n\nIncorporation by Reference\n\n\t(f)\tThe actions shall be done in accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin 747-28-2205, Revision 1, dated April 16, 1998; Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-28A2208, dated May 14, 1998; and Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-28A2210, dated May 14, 1998. This incorporation by reference was approved previously by the Director of the Federal Register as of May 11, 1999 (64 FR 16625, April 6, 1999). Copies may be obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW, suite 700, Washington, DC.\n\n\t(g)\tThe effective date of this amendment remains May 11, 1999.
2024-26-01: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all Airbus Helicopters Model H160-B helicopters. This AD was prompted by a report of excessive axial play of the rotating scissors spherical bearings. This AD requires measuring the axial play of the rotating scissors spherical bearings and, depending on the results, accomplishing corrective action and reporting inspection results, as specified in a European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD, which is incorporated by reference. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
99-15-01: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Pratt & Whitney PW4000 series turbofan engines, that reduces life limits of certain 4th stage low pressure turbine (LPT) disks. It also allows the original life limits of the disks to be restored if reoperation is performed to incorporate the original slotted cooling hole configuration. This amendment is prompted by reports that a change of a cooling hole geometry, which was introduced in the design of certain 4th stage LPT disks, inadvertently caused a reduction on the cooling air flow to the disk and an increased level of stress. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent an uncontained disk failure and damage to the aircraft. The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of September 14, 1999.
2012-18-12: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Airbus Model A318, A319, and A320 series airplanes. This AD was prompted by a report of a torn out aspirator due to the aspirator interfering with the extrusion lip of the off-wing escape slide (OWS) enclosure during the initial stage of the deployment sequence. This AD requires modifying the OWS enclosures on both sides. We are issuing this AD to prevent both off-wing exits from being inoperative, which, during an emergency, would impair the safe evacuation of occupants, possibly resulting in personal injuries.
68-21-01: 68-21-01 GLASFLUGEL: Amendment 39-666. Applies to Glasflugel H-301 "Libelle" Gliders, Serial Numbers 1 through 85. Compliance required within the next 25 hours' time in service after the effective date of this AD, unless already accomplished. To prevent the improper installation of the horizontal stabilizer to the glider, install locking guide fitting P/N 301-33-8, either on the left or right side of the main elevator fitting in accordance with Glasflugel Modification Leaflet No. 25, dated August 13, 1968, or later LBA- approved issue or an FAA approved equivalent. This amendment becomes effective October 23, 1968.
2012-17-06: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Piper Aircraft, Inc. Models PA-24, PA-24-250, and PA-24-260 airplanes. This AD was prompted by reports of cracks developing in the stabilator horn assembly. This AD requires replacement of the stabilator horn assembly and/or repetitive inspections of the stabilator horn assembly for corrosion or cracks, as applicable. Corrosion or cracks could lead to failure of the stabilator horn. Consequently, failure of the stabilator horn could lead to a loss of pitch control in flight. We are issuing this AD to correct the unsafe condition on these products.
2018-05-04: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all Airbus Model A318-111 and -112 airplanes; Model A319-111, -112, -113, - 114, and -115 airplanes; Model A320-211, -212, and -214 airplanes; and Model A321-111, -112, -211, -212, and -213 airplanes. This AD was prompted by reports of engine fan cowl door (FCD) losses on airplanes equipped with CFM56 engines due to operator failure to close the FCD during ground operations. This AD requires modification and re- identification, or replacement, of certain FCDs. This AD also requires installation of a placard. We are issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.